Acer Swift SF314-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Swift SF314-51  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer M3_SK
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 13 '22 at 12:37
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Memory 80
1-Core 71.1
2-Core 129
57% 93.5 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 179
23% 175 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Acer(1025 1140) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4444
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
4.36% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 3
Parallax 5.1
4% 4.47 fps
MRender 0.6
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 8.7
4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.36%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30001P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 195 177 155 156 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 388
Write 246
Mixed 202
SusWrite 166
56% 250 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 32.6
4K Mixed 18.6
71% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 171
133% 183 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF25664HZ-2G3B1 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.9% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 17.2
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.6
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Swift SF314-51 Builds (Compare 175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Swift SF314-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback