IntelBX80646I54460
$194
AMDFD9370FHHKWOF
 $194 

4 Cores, 4 Threads @3.2GHz, Haswell.
Release date: Q2 2014.

8 Cores, 8 Threads @4.4GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q3 2013.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 254,457 user samples
245,403 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 72% Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 46% Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 46% Great: 72%
SPEED RANK: 553rd / 1452
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
9,054 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 70% Base clock 5 GHz
Worst Bench: 55% Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Poor: 55% Great: 70%
SPEED RANK: 549th / 1452
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
62.1 % 62.5 % +1%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
78.6 Pts 82.3 Pts +5%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
83.8 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+24%
67.7 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
164 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+28%
128 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
263 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+13%
232 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
281 Pts 380 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+35%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
91.8 Pts 92.1 Pts +0%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
92.4 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+12%
82.2 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
181 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+15%
158 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
325 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+12%
290 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
331 Pts 481 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+45%
Market Share
Based on 68,067,802 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.16 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
0 %
Value
Value For Money
68.6 % 69 % +1%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
58 % Slightly more popular.
+9%
53 %
Price
Price (score)
$194 $194 +0%
Age
Newest
121 Months Slightly more recent.
+8%
131 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
84 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+62%
220 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
4 cores 8 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
4 threads 8 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
22 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+31%
32 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.2 GHz 4.4 GHz Much faster base frequency.
+38%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
3.4 GHz 4.7 GHz Much faster turbo frequency.
+38%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
333 Pts 482 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+45%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
283 Pts 386 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+36%
Series
CPU Architecture
Haswell Piledriver
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1150 AM3+
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
HD 4600 None
ADVERTISEMENT

The Intel Core i5-4460 is a slightly upgraded version of Intel's 2013 Haswell i5-4440. Comparing the i5-4460 and i5-4440 shows that the only change is an increase in both base and turbo frequencies from 3.4 to 3.5 GHz. In terms of effective speed the 4460 is exactly on a par with the average of the top ten user rated CPUs, not a bad result for an i5. Thanks to its four cores the 4460 is can easily deal with the vast majority of desktop computing (email, web browsing, word processing etc.). In fact this model is probably overpowered for the majority of users. Most users wont require the multi-core capabilities that the 4460 offers and will do better to choose a lower powered and cheaper CPU. [Jun '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The FX-9370 is the slightly lower clocked (4.4 GHz) version of AMD's flagship FX-9 range of desktop processors. The FX-9590 comes clocked at 4.7 GHz with a staggering turbo clock of 5 GHz. Comparing the 9370 and 9590 versions shows that there is only 3% between the two processors at stock clocks but when overclocked they both have an identical performance profile. Given that the 9590 costs nearly 25% more the 9370 should be the obvious choice. Both of these processors have superb multi-core performance but they both lag Intel when it comes to single and dual-core workloads. Until AMD can improve single core performance they will continue to struggle in the high end PC market. [Mar '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback