IntelBX80646I54440
AMDFD9590FHHKWOF

4 Cores, 4 Threads @3.1GHz, Haswell.
Release date: Q3 2013.

8 Cores, 8 Threads @4.7GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q3 2013.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 107,220 user samples
81,111 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 70% Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 45% Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Poor: 45% Great: 70%
SPEED RANK: 568th / 1452
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
26,109 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 71% Base clock 4.7 GHz
Worst Bench: 52% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Poor: 52% Great: 71%
SPEED RANK: 541st / 1452
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
61.3 % 63.1 % +3%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
78.2 Pts 81.4 Pts +4%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
80.8 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+14%
70.6 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
159 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+20%
133 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
257 Pts Slightly faster quad-core speed.
+6%
243 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
271 Pts 390 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+44%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
91.1 Pts 92.1 Pts +1%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
89.5 Pts Slightly faster OC single-core speed.
+9%
82.3 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
175 Pts Slightly faster OC dual-core speed.
+9%
160 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
315 Pts Slightly faster OC quad-core speed.
+7%
294 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
320 Pts 482 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+51%
Market Share
Based on 68,068,918 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.1 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
0 %
Value
Value For Money
75.9 % Better value.
+23%
61.9 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
54 % 56 % +4%
Price
Price (score)
$128 Much cheaper.
+57%
$298
Age
Newest
129 Months +2% 131 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
84 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+62%
220 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
4 cores 8 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
4 threads 8 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
22 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+31%
32 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.1 GHz 4.7 GHz Much faster base frequency.
+52%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
3.3 GHz 5 GHz Much faster turbo frequency.
+52%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
321 Pts 479 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+49%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
274 Pts 396 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+45%
Series
CPU Architecture
Haswell Piledriver
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1150 AM3+
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
HD 4600 None
ADVERTISEMENT

The Intel i5-4440 is one of the cheaper four core Haswell processors. Unfortunately it is clocked at just 3.3 GHz Turbo, which is 15% lower than the leading Haswell i5 and because it has a locked multiplier there is little that can be done about it. Comparing the 4440 to the 4670K shows that the 15% reduction in Turbo clock speed basically results in a 23% performance loss to the 4670K. The Pentium G3420 actually has a higher base clock speed and costs about a third as much as the i5-4440 yet for the majority of, single and dual-core, desktop orientated tasks offers comparable performance. I don't think the i5-4440 makes much sense and would prefer either a much stronger 4770 or the weaker but much better value G3420[Mar '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

AMD released the FX-9590 back in July 2013 but it's not until recently that these processors have started hitting the shelves and even now prices are still extremely high. This is the first mainstream 5GHz processor but clock speed isn't the key performance indicator it once was. Comparing the 9590 to the 8350 shows that the 9590 has 16% better overall performance which is almost exactly in line with its base clock increase from 4.0 to 4.7 GHz. Despite this performance boost the 9590 still lags Intel's most recent 4770K Haswell processor by 26% and that's despite the AMD's 27% higher base clock. In terms of relative performance the AMD's strong point is Integer processing where it has 8 processing units vs just four (one per core) in the 4770K. Overall, especially at current prices, the 9590 doesn't represent good value for money. [Jan '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback