Today's hottest deals
Intel
Intel
$160
  

2 Cores, 4 Threads @1.5 GHz, Haswell.
Release date ≤ Q1 2014.

 $160 

2 Cores, 4 Threads @2.3GHz, Sandy Bridge-E.
Release date: Q1 2011.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 47,338 user samples
596 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 53% Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 26% Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 0.95 GHz (avg)
Poor: 26% Great: 53%
SPEED RANK: 969th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
46,742 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 58% Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 26% Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Poor: 26% Great: 58%
SPEED RANK: 882nd / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
44.4 % 47.9 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+8%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
70.8 Pts 72.1 Pts +2%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
43.4 Pts 58.2 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+34%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
71.4 Pts 97.9 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+37%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
107 Pts 139 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+30%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
110 Pts 142 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+29%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
86.4 Pts 87.3 Pts +1%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
55.6 Pts 74.4 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+34%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
89.7 Pts 131 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+46%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
127 Pts 178 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+40%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
126 Pts 178 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+41%
Market Share
Based on 69,016,532 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0 % 0.02 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
50 % 54 % Slightly more popular.
+8%
Age
Newest
127+ Months More recent.
+23%
166 Months
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
126 Pts 179 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+42%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
110 Pts 144 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+31%
Launch Date
Launch Date
Q3'13 Q1'11
Instruction Set Extensions
Instruction Set Extensions
SSE4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0 AVX
Lithography
Lithography
22 nm 32 nm
Recommended Price
Recommended Customer Price
$281.00 N/A
Max Turbo Frequency
Max Turbo Frequency
1.9 GHz 2.9 GHz
Bus Speed
Bus Speed
5 GT/s DMI2 5 GT/s DMI
Memory Types
Memory Types
DDR3L 1333/1600, LPDDR3 1333/1600 DDR3 1066/1333
Memory Bandwidth
Max Memory Bandwidth
25.6 GB/s 21.3 GB/s
Processor Graphics
Processor Graphics ‡
Intel® HD Graphics 4200 Intel® HD Graphics 3000
Graphics Base Frequency
Graphics Base Frequency
200 MHz 650 MHz
Graphics Output
Graphics Output
eDP/DP/HDMI eDP/DP/HDMI/SDVO/CRT
# of Displays Supported
# of Displays Supported ‡
3 2
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency
850 MHz 1.2 GHz
Flexible Display Interface
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI)
No Yes
Package Size
Package Size
40mm x 24mm x 1.5mm 37.5mmx37.5mm (rPGA988B); 31mm x 24mm (BGA1023)
AES New Instructions
Intel® AES New Instructions
Yes No
PCI Express Configurations
PCI Express Configurations ‡
4x1, 2x4 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4
Max # of PCI Express Lanes
Max # of PCI Express Lanes
12 16

More specs » More specs »

The Intel i5-2410M is a dual-core four thread mobile processor based on the Sandy Bridge architecture. It was launched in Q1 2011 and at the time was reasonably fast with an effective speedof 58: the base clock speed is 2.3 GHz which can boost up to 2.9 GHz when required. The TDP of 35W is relatively high by modern standards and is halved in the i5-3317U (full comparison here). A lower TDP leads to extended battery life which a big plus for mobile processors. The i5-2410M features an integrated Intel HD Graphics 3000 which is less than adequate for the demands of modern games. That said, the i5-2410M is absolutely fine for handling the majority of day to day tasks such as word-processing and web-browsing. [Nov '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback