Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire 5750G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAcer Aspire 5750G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JE50_HR
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110524
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 16 '22 at 11:26
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 86
1-Core 69.1
2-Core 134
60% 96.3 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 170
23% 172 Pts
64-Core 176
11% 176 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Acer(1025 0504) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.77% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 1.6
2% 2.23 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.5
2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.77%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
337GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG40
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 103 202 210 222 230 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
43% Average
Read 394
Write 346
Mixed 292
SusWrite 197
69% 307 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 21.8
4K Mixed 10.6
33% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 35.1
47% 84.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
55.1% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 18.1
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 15.2
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 5750G Builds (Compare 754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 5750G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback