Intel
$160
AMD100-100000059WOF
 $160 

2 Cores, 4 Threads @2.3GHz, Sandy Bridge-E.
Release date: Q1 2011.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 79,768 user samples
46,742 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 58% Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 26% Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Poor: 26% Great: 58%
SPEED RANK: 856th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
33,026 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 110% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 90% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 90% Great: 110%
SPEED RANK: 68th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
47.9 % 100 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+109%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
72.1 Pts 81 Pts Lower memory latency.
+12%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
58.2 Pts 164 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+182%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
97.9 Pts 326 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+233%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
139 Pts 639 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+360%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
142 Pts 1232 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+768%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
87.3 Pts 92.7 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+6%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
74.4 Pts 180 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+142%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
131 Pts 355 Pts Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
+171%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
178 Pts 697 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+292%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
178 Pts 1376 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+673%
Market Share
Based on 67,778,647 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.01 % 0.17 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,600%
Value
Value For Money
55.7 % 89.7 % Much better value.
+61%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
53 % 69 % Much more popular.
+30%
Price
Price (score)
$160 Much cheaper.
+62%
$416
Age
Newest
159 Months 41 Months Much more recent.
+74%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
35 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+67%
105 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
2 cores 16 cores Hugely higher core count.
+700%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
4 threads 32 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+700%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
32 nm 7 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+78%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
2.3 GHz 3.4 GHz Much faster base frequency.
+48%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
2.9 GHz 4.9 GHz Much faster turbo frequency.
+69%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
179 Pts 3063 Pts Insanely faster OC 64-core speed.
+1,611%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
144 Pts 2633 Pts Insanely faster 64-core speed.
+1,728%
Series
CPU Architecture
Sandy Bridge-E Zen3
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FCBGA1023 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
HD 3000 None
ADVERTISEMENT

The Intel i5-2410M is a dual-core four thread mobile processor based on the Sandy Bridge architecture. It was launched in Q1 2011 and at the time was reasonably fast with an effective speedof 58: the base clock speed is 2.3 GHz which can boost up to 2.9 GHz when required. The TDP of 35W is relatively high by modern standards and is halved in the i5-3317U (full comparison here). A lower TDP leads to extended battery life which a big plus for mobile processors. The i5-2410M features an integrated Intel HD Graphics 3000 which is less than adequate for the demands of modern games. That said, the i5-2410M is absolutely fine for handling the majority of day to day tasks such as word-processing and web-browsing. [Nov '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The 16-core, 32-thread Ryzen 9 5950X is an impressive workhorse. It sits at the top of AMD’s latest Zen 3 based, 5000 series of CPUs and sends a clear message that AMD can beat Intel in terms of raw performance and core count. The 5950X has a boost clock speed of up to 4.9 GHz, a massive 72 MB cache and a TDP rating of 105W. Despite the “gaming” focus of AMD’s 5000 series launch marketing, the 5950X does not efficiently leverage all its 16 cores in gaming (as demonstrated by similar effective speed scores compared to the 12-core 5900X, 8-core 5800X and 6-core 5600X.) 16 cores are only suitable for professional use cases that have CPU processing needs which cannot be more efficiently met by a GPU or other dedicated hardware. There is no Intel equivalent with this number of cores, and the 5950X’s uniqueness is reflected in its $799 USD price tag, 45% more expensive than the 5900X. Gamers will get far higher FPS per dollar by allocating a higher proportion of their budget towards a better GPU rather than blowing $799 USD on the 5950X. Professional users that plan to use 32 concurrent threads at 100% load will find value in the 5950X. On the other hand, workstation users that rarely exceed 20 concurrent threads at 100% should consider the 10850K for around half the money. [Nov '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback