IntelBX8071513400F
AMDAD860KXBJASBX

10 Cores, 16 Threads @2.5GHz, Raptor Lake.
Release date: Q1 2023.

4 Cores, 4 Threads @3.7GHz, Steamroller.
Release date: Q3 2014.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 38,212 user samples
8,325 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 110% Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 101% Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Poor: 101% Great: 110%
SPEED RANK: 60th / 1459
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
29,887 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 54% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 34% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Poor: 34% Great: 54%
SPEED RANK: 937th / 1459
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
106 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+132%
45.4 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
81.7 Pts Much lower memory latency.
+32%
61.7 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
185 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+197%
62.3 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
368 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+229%
112 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
693 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+308%
170 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
1162 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+568%
174 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
90.1 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+18%
76.1 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
192 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+174%
70.1 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
384 Pts Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
+193%
131 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
747 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+264%
205 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1233 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+504%
204 Pts
Market Share
Based on 68,236,819 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.25 % Insanely higher market share.
+2,400%
0.01 %
Value
Value For Money
121 % Much better value.
+67%
72.3 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
91 % Much more popular.
+69%
54 %
Price
Price (score)
$170 $51 Much cheaper.
+70%
Age
Newest
18 Months Hugely more recent.
+85%
119 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+32%
95 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
10 cores Hugely higher core count.
+150%
4 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
16 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+300%
4 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
10 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+64%
28 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
2.5 GHz 3.7 GHz Much faster base frequency.
+48%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.6 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+15%
4 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1677 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+722%
204 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1635 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+834%
175 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Raptor Lake Steamroller
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1700 FM2+
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

The Raptor Lake Intel i5-13400F ($200 USD, cooler included) paired with a B660/B760 motherboard ($150 USD) and 2x8 GB DDR4 3600 RAM ($50 USD) offers good value for money to mid-range gamers. The 13400F has around 5% higher single-core and 35% higher multi-core performance than its predecessor. Although both processors feature the same Golden Cove p-cores, the 13400F has four additional energy efficient e-cores which account for the improvement in multi-core performance. The 13400F offers comparable gaming and better multi-core performance than AMD's 7600X but at a lower price and without the need for an aftermarket cooler, DDR5 memory and an expensive motherboard. Since Intel don’t care for long term relationships with PC hardware influencers, for product launches, they often end up sponsoring influencers that are mostly funded by AMD. As a result, Intel rarely get positive marketing coverage beyond launch, and their products remain relatively under priced compared to AMD. When paired with a DDR4 motherboard the 13100F/13400F CPUs (at MSRP) offer unbeatable/good value to entry/mid level PC gamers. High end gamers should investigate the 13600K, which thanks to both higher clocks and higher IPC (Raptor Cove), is around 15% faster than the 13400F. [Jan '23 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD Athlon X4 860K is a quad core budget processor. Released in mid 2014, the 860K is based on the steamroller architecture which also powers some of AMD's more recent APUs including the A10-7850K. In addition to a 3.7 GHz steamroller chip, the A10-7850K also includes integrated R7 graphics. Comparing the CPU performance of the A10-7850K and 860K shows that the two processors perform almost identically. A key comparable for the 860K is Intel's G3258 which is an unlocked dual core Pentium. Comparing the G3258 and X4 860K shows that the G3258 leads by as much as 70% for dual and single core workloads but the 860K outperforms the G3258 by around 20% on multi-core workloads. The G3258 wins hands down for Desktop computing which is heavily single and dual core dominated but for some (relatively rare) gaming workloads the X4 860K will outperform the G3258. [Mar '15 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback