IntelBX8071512500
IntelBX80648I75960X

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.0GHz, Alder Lake.
Release date: Q1 2022.

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.0GHz, Haswell-E.
Release date: Q3 2014.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 19,183 user samples
3,715 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 106% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 91% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Poor: 91% Great: 106%
SPEED RANK: 83rd / 1456
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
15,468 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 94% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 70% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 70% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 235th / 1456
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
99.2 % Faster effective speed.
+23%
80.5 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
80.8 Pts 87 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+8%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
181 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+81%
100 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
343 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+71%
201 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
631 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+59%
398 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
992 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+38%
718 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
91 Pts 95.3 Pts +5%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
191 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+49%
128 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
368 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+45%
254 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
689 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+37%
502 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1053 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+14%
920 Pts
Market Share
Based on 68,177,430 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.06 % Much higher market share.
+50%
0.04 %
Value
Value For Money
109 % Better value.
+26%
86.8 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
57 % +2% 56 %
Price
Price (score)
$196 Slightly cheaper.
+7%
$211
Age
Newest
30 Months Much more recent.
+75%
119 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+54%
140 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
6 cores 8 cores Much higher core count.
+33%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
12 threads 16 threads Much higher thread count.
+33%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
10 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+55%
22 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3 GHz 3 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.6 GHz Much faster turbo frequency.
+31%
3.5 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1251 Pts 1353 Pts Slightly faster OC 64-core speed.
+8%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1199 Pts Faster 64-core speed.
+12%
1075 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Alder Lake Haswell-E
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1700 LGA2011-V3
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD 770 None
ADVERTISEMENT

Intel's i5 12500 is a weird processor. It is around $40 more expensive than the i5 12400(F) for slightly higher clocks and a better iGPU that most gamers will not care about - which is the thing Alder Lake focuses most on from what we've seen. It is not good value. This does not mean it is a bad CPU, it is still very capable of gaming and could be more capable in workstation and desktop use thanks to the improved iGPU. I do not believe it deserves a $40 tax for those situations though. [Apr '22 Waaaaaal]

MORE DETAILS

The Intel 5960X sports eight cores and sixteen threads. That's two more cores than we have ever seen on a consumer processor before and as such this $1,000 processor offers record breaking multi-threaded CPU horsepower. Unfortunately the 5960X is clocked at just 3 GHz base and 3.5 GHz turbo which, for single and dual-core workloads, renders it around 15% slower than a $69 G3258 on stock clocks! The 5960X is only compatible with Intel's new X99 chipset which requires new DDR4 RAM and is currently far more expensive, with little consumer benefit, than DDR3. All in all the i7-5960X processor is largely irrelevant for consumers as it's far far too expensive. [Sep '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback