COMPARE
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
IntelBX8071512400F
IntelBX80646I74771
▲ 9610,497 ▼

6 Cores, 12 Threads @2.5GHz, Alder Lake.
Release date: Q1 2022.

VS
▲ 54743 ▼

4 Cores, 8 Threads @3.5GHz, Haswell.
Release date: Q2 2013.

Effective Speed 
+33%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 60,066 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
48,886 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 105% Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 92% Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Poor: 92% Great: 105%
SPEED RANK: 93rd / 1456
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
11,180 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 82% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 60% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg)
Poor: 60% Great: 82%
SPEED RANK: 336th / 1456
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		98 % Much faster effective speed.
+33% 		73.5 %
Average Score 
+62%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		81.6 Pts 84.2 Pts +3%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		172 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+70% 		101 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		330 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+71% 		193 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		614 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+81% 		340 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		974 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+90% 		512 Pts
Overclocked Score 
+53%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		91.1 Pts 93.9 Pts +3%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		182 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+64% 		111 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		352 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+60% 		220 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		673 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+66% 		406 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		1029 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+80% 		571 Pts
Value & Sentiment 
+1,708%
Market Share
Based on 68,118,657 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		2.04 % Insanely higher market share.
+6,700% 		0.03 %
Value
Value For Money 		126 % Much better value.
+39% 		90.8 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		96 % Much more popular.
+78% 		54 %
Price
Price (score) 		$110 Cheaper.
+15% 		$129
Nice To Haves 
+52%
Age
Newest 		29 Months Much more recent.
+78% 		132 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		65 Watts More energy efficient.
+23% 		84 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		6 cores Much higher core count.
+50% 		4 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		12 threads Much higher thread count.
+50% 		8 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		10 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+55% 		22 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		2.5 GHz 3.5 GHz Much faster base frequency.
+40%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		4.4 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+13% 		3.9 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		1220 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+113% 		573 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		1178 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+127% 		519 Pts
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Alder Lake Haswell
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		FCLGA1700 FCLGA1150
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		None HD 4600
Conclusion 
Average Bench 98%
Average Bench 73.5%
ADVERTISEMENT

Intel’s Alder Lake i5-12400F offers six hyper-threaded performance cores at an MSRP of just $180 USD. This represents excellent value for consumers and, in particular, gamers. It has a boost frequency of 4.4 GHz, 18 MB of L3 cache and a TDP of 65W. The F-version of the CPU does not have integrated graphics, however this will be of little concern to gamers with discrete GPUs. Whilst Intel’s overclockable i5-12600K has four additional efficiency cores and offers around 12% more performance than the 12400F, it also costs around 50% more. The 12400F offers great value, but to achieve optimal performance the requisite B660 motherboard (which supports 3200+ RAM) is, at least for now, difficult to find at reasonable ($150 USD) prices. AMD’s top value hex-core Ryzen 5 5600X offers similar performance for 50% more money. Despite Intel’s price / performance lead, AMD’s prolific marketers (forums, youtube, reddit etc.) have historically outsold Intel whilst carrying a similar handicap. [Jan '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Intel i7-4771 is the same as the i7-4770 apart from a 100 MHz increase in base clock from 3.4 GHz to 3.5 GHz. In theory this increase will only impact multi-core workloads because both processors have the same turbo clock of 3.9 GHz which should be engaged during single and dual core workloads. On multi-core workloads the turbo needs to be disabled in order to maintain acceptable core temperatures and operating frequencies drop to base clock where the i7-4771 has a marginal 100 MHz or 2.9% advantage. In other words the two processors should be largely identical. Looking at the i7-4770 vs the i7-4771 benchmarks verifies this. Both the 4770 and 4771 are the current top end mainstream market leaders but for the vast majority of desktop users they are probably overkill as typical consumer use rarely requires more than two cores. [Mar '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
48,886
11,180
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback