Asrock B660M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics75.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B660M-C  (all builds)
Memory16.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220105
Uptime12 Days
Run DateOct 12 '23 at 21:08
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$110
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Memory 80.1
1-Core 158
2-Core 301
97% 180 Pts
4-Core 555
8-Core 899
89% 727 Pts
64-Core 1051
65% 1051 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$255
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.2% Very good
Lighting 102
Reflection 84
Parallax 89.6
84% 92 fps
MRender 82.7
Gravity 72.3
Splatting 64.7
59% 73.2 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 579 241 284 305 288 275 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 609
Write 636
Mixed 585
SusWrite 329
121% 540 MB/s
4K Read 47.9
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 63.2
224% 81.6 MB/s
DQ Read 824
DQ Write 682
DQ Mixed 1,000
682% 836 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 147%
Great: 271%
WD Elements 2621 2TB
665GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 100 104 103 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 97.9
Write 98.7
Mixed 67.4
SusWrite 102
124% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.3
155% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2E3200C16 Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 CMK16GX4M2E3200C16 Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 32GB
2133, 2400, 2133, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 33.2
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 32.5
SC Mixed 25.4
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 19 215 59 60 23.8" 1280 720 MSI3BA7 MSI G241V
Typical B660M-C Builds (Compare 1,461 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock B660M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $595
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback