Today's hottest deals
IntelBX8070110600K
AMDYD270XBGAFBOX

6 Cores, 12 Threads @4.1GHz, Comet Lake.
Release date: Q2 2020.

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.7GHz, Zen+.
Release date: Q2 2018.

CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
284 EFps Much Better CSGO EFps.
+42%
200 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
106 EFps Slightly Better GTAV EFps.
+9%
97 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
139 EFps Slightly Better Overwatch EFps.
+8%
129 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
139 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+21%
115 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
139 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+29%
108 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 230,028 user samples
70,951 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 100% Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 81% Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Poor: 81% Great: 100%
SPEED RANK: 145th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
159,077 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 89% Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 61% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 0.6 GHz (avg)
Poor: 61% Great: 89%
SPEED RANK: 319th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
92.2 % Faster effective speed.
+22%
75.7 %
10 Mar21|HardwareLUXX
Processor non grata: Rocket Lake-S...
21 % BFV 24%, SotTR 19%, MetroEx 23%, Divis2 19%
05 Nov20|Techpowerup
AMD Ryzen 5 5800X Review
15 % FarC5 36%, BFV 22%, SotTR 5%, Rage2 2%, Witcher3 7%, Civ6 15%, ACO 3%, MetroEx 14%, Sekiro 36%, Wolf2 10%
28 May20|Techpowerup
Intel Core i5-10400F Review - Six ...
15 % FarC5 36%, BFV 22%, SotTR 5%, Rage2 2%, Witcher3 7%, Civ6 15%, ACO 3%, MetroEx 14%, Sekiro 36%, Wolf2 10%
06 Nov20|Gamers Nexus
Friendly Fire: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X C...
23 % SotTR 30%, GTAV 21%, RDR2 20%, TWarTKC 18%, F120 34%, TWarTKB 18%, ACO 21%
05 Nov20|Anandtech
AMD Zen 3 Ryzen Deep Dive Review: ...
16 % FarC5 31%, StrangeB 2%, Bord3 16%, GTAV 17%, FinFant15 20%, Chernob 11%, DExMD 34%, FinFant14 14%, F119 31%, GearsT 35%, WoT 26% Civ6 23%, RDR2 1%
26 Dec20|Tom's Hardware
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X Review: The Pric...
22 % Hitm2 20%, FarC5 26%, Bord3 16%, ProjC3 30%, SotTR 28%, RDR2 16%, Divis2 16%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
90.5 Pts Lower memory latency.
+20%
75.3 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
137 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+21%
113 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
268 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+22%
219 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
505 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+23%
409 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
825 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+17%
708 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
96.6 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+11%
86.7 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
149 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+16%
128 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
296 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+17%
254 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
569 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+14%
499 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
918 Pts +1% 911 Pts
Market Share
Based on 69,002,095 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.27 % 0.27 %
Value
Value For Money
113 % Better value.
+26%
89.7 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
89 % More popular.
+29%
69 %
Price
Price (score)
$134 Cheaper.
+11%
$150
Age
Newest
54 Months Much more recent.
+31%
78 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
125 Watts 105 Watts More energy efficient.
+16%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
6 cores 8 cores Much higher core count.
+33%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
12 threads 16 threads Much higher thread count.
+33%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
14 nm 12 nm Newer manufacturing.
+14%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
4.1 GHz Faster base frequency.
+11%
3.7 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.8 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+12%
4.3 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1,154 Pts 1,276 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+11%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1,041 Pts 1,096 Pts Slightly faster 64-core speed.
+5%
Series
CPU Architecture
Comet Lake Zen+
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1200 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD 630 None

Intel’s tenth gen, six-core i5-10600K is one of the fastest consumer CPUs currently available. Out of the box, its maximum all core frequency is 4.5 GHz, but a simple overclock allows all 12 threads to hit 5.0 GHz. Although a new Z490 (LGA1200) motherboard is required, Intel have indicated that LGA1200 will remain compatible with Rocket Lake CPUs which are due later this year. The eight-core Ryzen 3700X currently competes in the 10600K’s price bracket. CPU based encoding is akin to using hair clippers on a lawn but If dedicated hardware such as NVENC or QuickSync is not an option, the 3700X can outperform the 10600K in encoding workloads such as UserBenchmark 64-core, Cinebench, Blender-CPU and Handbrake-CPU. Meanwhile, the 10600K is better for almost everything else. Currently, the real problem with the 10600K, and much of the Comet Lake line up, is availability. Whilst there was a paper launch in Q2 2020, at the time of writing, the 10600K is still largely unavailable for purchase. In order to achieve better value for money, without compromising on gaming performance, it is necessary to consider the older generation 9600K which is 26% cheaper and offers similar gaming performance. [Jun '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The 8 core, 16 thread 2700X is AMD’s second generation Ryzen 7 flagship following in the wake of the Ryzen 7 1800X which continues to offer excellent multi-core value for money. This new Pinnacle Ridge processor features the Zen+ architecture with 12nm lithography compared to 14nm previously. Whilst there is no increase in the number of cores, the stock base / boost clocks appear to have received a bump up to 3.7 / 4.3 GHz from 3.6 / 4.0 GHz. The 2700X is compatible with both the new 400 series and 300 series of motherboards. Early benchmarks indicate that the 2700X has a slightly greater effective speed than the 1800X, although further benchmarks are necessary to quantify this. The expected launch price of $329 includes a Wraith Prism cooler and is in the same price bracket as the 1800X and Intel’s Coffee Lake i7-8700K. Whilst the 6 core, 12 thread 8700K beats the 2700X in single and quad core performance by around 15%, the 2700X wins on multi-core workloads. PC gaming and desktop performance is generally governed by six or less cores but the 2700X offers value for money to workstation users. Even though the 2700X excels at video production, streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback