COMPARE
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
IntelBX8070110600K
AMDFD8350FRHKBOX
▲ 899,474 ▼

6 Cores, 12 Threads @4.1GHz, Comet Lake.
Release date: Q2 2020.

VS
▲ 5726,794 ▼

8 Cores, 8 Threads @4.0GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q4 2012.

Effective Speed 
+52%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 384,147 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
70,951 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 100% Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 81% Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Poor: 81% Great: 100%
SPEED RANK: 145th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
313,196 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 68% Base clock 4.75 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 48% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 48% Great: 68%
SPEED RANK: 592nd / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		92.2 % Much faster effective speed.
+52% 		60.8 %
Average Score 
+103%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		90.5 Pts Lower memory latency.
+12% 		81 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		137 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+113% 		64.3 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		268 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+120% 		122 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		505 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+129% 		221 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		825 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+142% 		341 Pts
Overclocked Score 
+94%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		96.6 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+5% 		91.8 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		149 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+103% 		73.3 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		296 Pts Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
+107% 		143 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		569 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+124% 		254 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		918 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+131% 		397 Pts
Value & Sentiment 
+113%
Market Share
Based on 69,006,524 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.25 % Hugely higher market share.
+400% 		0.05 %
Value
Value For Money 		113 % Much better value.
+34% 		84.2 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		89 % Much more popular.
+56% 		57 %
Price
Price (score) 		$134 $85 Much cheaper.
+37%
Nice To Haves 
+59%
Age
Newest 		54 Months Much more recent.
+63% 		145 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		125 Watts 125 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		6 cores 8 cores Much higher core count.
+33%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		12 threads Much higher thread count.
+50% 		8 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		14 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+56% 		32 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		4.1 GHz +2% 4 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		4.8 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+14% 		4.2 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		1,154 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+181% 		411 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		1,041 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+195% 		353 Pts
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Comet Lake Piledriver
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		FCLGA1200 AM3+
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		UHD 630 None
Conclusion 
Average Bench 92.2%
Average Bench 60.8%

Intel’s tenth gen, six-core i5-10600K is one of the fastest consumer CPUs currently available. Out of the box, its maximum all core frequency is 4.5 GHz, but a simple overclock allows all 12 threads to hit 5.0 GHz. Although a new Z490 (LGA1200) motherboard is required, Intel have indicated that LGA1200 will remain compatible with Rocket Lake CPUs which are due later this year. The eight-core Ryzen 3700X currently competes in the 10600K’s price bracket. CPU based encoding is akin to using hair clippers on a lawn but If dedicated hardware such as NVENC or QuickSync is not an option, the 3700X can outperform the 10600K in encoding workloads such as UserBenchmark 64-core, Cinebench, Blender-CPU and Handbrake-CPU. Meanwhile, the 10600K is better for almost everything else. Currently, the real problem with the 10600K, and much of the Comet Lake line up, is availability. Whilst there was a paper launch in Q2 2020, at the time of writing, the 10600K is still largely unavailable for purchase. In order to achieve better value for money, without compromising on gaming performance, it is necessary to consider the older generation 9600K which is 26% cheaper and offers similar gaming performance. [Jun '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

In terms of raw single-core performance the flagship AMD FX-8350 is lagging behind intel's processor line-up by over two generations. The PassMark Single Thread scores for the i5-2500K vs the FX-8350 are 1863 to 1520 which shows that in terms of raw per-core processing the FX-8350 is lagging the two year old i5 by 23%. Where the AMD FX makes up is on multi-core performance, with a score of 9156 vs 6745, the AMD leads the Intel 2500K by 36% making it the far more capable multi-threaded server orientated performer. The 8350 is also cheaper but significantly more power hungry which counts strongly against it as a server proposition. The FX-8350 could be a good fit for specific server use cases but for general consumer use, which is single and dual core intensive, Intel's two year old i5-2500K delivers better performance. [May '13 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
70,951
313,196
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback