Today's hottest deals
IntelBX8070110400F
IntelBX80684I59500

6 Cores, 12 Threads @2.9GHz, Comet Lake.
Release date: Q2 2020.

  

6 Cores, 6 Threads @3.00 GHz, 65 W.
Release date ≈ Q2 2019.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 162,085 user samples
153,026 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 92% Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 75% Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 75% Great: 92%
SPEED RANK: 198th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
9,059 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 94% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 69% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Poor: 69% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 183rd / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
85.2 % 87 % +2%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
89.6 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+7%
84.1 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
118 Pts 127 Pts Slightly faster single-core speed.
+8%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
230 Pts 251 Pts Slightly faster dual-core speed.
+9%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
435 Pts 490 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+13%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
715 Pts Slightly faster octa-core speed.
+8%
664 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
95.9 Pts +1% 94.5 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
124 Pts 136 Pts Slightly faster OC single-core speed.
+10%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
246 Pts 268 Pts Slightly faster OC dual-core speed.
+9%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
485 Pts 522 Pts Slightly faster OC quad-core speed.
+8%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
778 Pts +1% 768 Pts
Market Share
Based on 68,907,781 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.51 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,578%
0.09 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
89 % Much more popular.
+62%
55 %
Age
Newest
54 Months More recent.
+16%
64+ Months
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
978 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+28%
765 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
903 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+33%
678 Pts
Launch Date
Launch Date
Q2'20 Q2'19
Cache
Cache
12 MB Intel® Smart Cache 9 MB SmartCache
Max Turbo Frequency
Max Turbo Frequency
4.30 GHz 4.40 GHz
Bus Speed
Bus Speed
8 GT/s 8 GT/s DMI3
Thermal Solution Specification
Thermal Solution Specification
PCG 2015C PCG 2015C (65W)
Turbo Boost Tech
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology ‡
2 2.0
Hyper-Threading Tech
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology ‡
Yes No
Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)
No Yes
Trusted Execution Tech
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology ‡
No Yes
PCI Express Revision
PCI Express Revision
3 3.0

More specs » More specs »

The i5-10400F is a six-core hyperthreaded CPU from Intel’s latest Comet Lake series of desktop processors. This 65 W CPU has single core and all core boost frequencies of 4.3 GHz and 4.0 GHz, respectively. Whilst the 10400F will require a new LGA1200 motherboard, such as the Z490, Intel have guaranteed that the next generation of Rocket Lake CPUs will also be compatible with this chipset. The 10400F is aimed at mid-tier gaming PC builds, and as such, ships with a cooler but without integrated graphics. Despite being officially launched in Q2 of 2020, at the time of writing, the 10400F is still not widely available. Compared to the similarly priced Ryzen 5 3600, the 10400F’s lower memory latency gives it the lead in gaming and effective speed benchmarks. Since the Ryzen architecture creates a gaming bottleneck, it is necessary to upgrade to a higher tier, Intel CPU for better gaming performance. On the other hand comparing the i5-10400F and the i3-10100 shows that the 10100 offers comparable gaming performance for 22% less money whilst also including integrated graphics. [Jun '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Way better than the older i3s that were in the old computers my school had.  [Feb '20 Drakorvich]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback