COMPARE
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
IntelBX8070110400F
IntelBX8070811600K
▲ 8910,232 ▼

6 Cores, 12 Threads @2.9GHz, Comet Lake.
Release date: Q2 2020.

VS
▲ 897,384 ▼

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.9GHz, Rocket Lake.
Release date: Q1 2021.

Game EFps  
+9%
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max 		238 EFps 296 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+24%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max 		100 EFps 108 EFps Slightly Better GTAV EFps.
+8%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max 		139 EFps 142 EFps +2%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max 		131 EFps 143 EFps Slightly Better PUBG EFps.
+9%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max 		131 EFps 134 EFps +2%
Effective Speed 
+17%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 196,992 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
153,026 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 92% Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 75% Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 75% Great: 92%
SPEED RANK: 198th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
43,966 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 108% Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 91% Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Poor: 91% Great: 108%
SPEED RANK: 93rd / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		85.2 % 99.3 % Faster effective speed.
+17%
Average Score 
+28%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		89.6 Pts +1% 88.4 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		118 Pts 162 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+37%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		230 Pts 313 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+36%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		435 Pts 592 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+36%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		715 Pts 945 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+32%
Overclocked Score 
+29%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		95.9 Pts +1% 95.4 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		124 Pts 172 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+39%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		246 Pts 338 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+37%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		485 Pts 661 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+36%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		778 Pts 1,034 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+33%
Value & Sentiment 
+75%
Market Share
Based on 69,004,783 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		1.2 % Hugely higher market share.
+275% 		0.32 %
Value
Value For Money 		115 % 121 % Slightly better value.
+5%
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		89 % 89 %
Price
Price (score) 		$94 Much cheaper.
+31% 		$136
Nice To Haves 
+9%
Age
Newest 		54 Months 43 Months More recent.
+20%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+48% 		125 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		6 cores 6 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		12 threads 12 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		14 nm 14 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		2.9 GHz 3.9 GHz Much faster base frequency.
+34%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		4.3 GHz 4.9 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+14%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		978 Pts 1,256 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+28%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		903 Pts 1,165 Pts Faster 64-core speed.
+29%
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Comet Lake Rocket Lake
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		FCLGA1200 FCLGA1200
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		None UHD 750
Conclusion 
Average Bench 85.2%
Average Bench 99.3%

The i5-10400F is a six-core hyperthreaded CPU from Intel’s latest Comet Lake series of desktop processors. This 65 W CPU has single core and all core boost frequencies of 4.3 GHz and 4.0 GHz, respectively. Whilst the 10400F will require a new LGA1200 motherboard, such as the Z490, Intel have guaranteed that the next generation of Rocket Lake CPUs will also be compatible with this chipset. The 10400F is aimed at mid-tier gaming PC builds, and as such, ships with a cooler but without integrated graphics. Despite being officially launched in Q2 of 2020, at the time of writing, the 10400F is still not widely available. Compared to the similarly priced Ryzen 5 3600, the 10400F’s lower memory latency gives it the lead in gaming and effective speed benchmarks. Since the Ryzen architecture creates a gaming bottleneck, it is necessary to upgrade to a higher tier, Intel CPU for better gaming performance. On the other hand comparing the i5-10400F and the i3-10100 shows that the 10100 offers comparable gaming performance for 22% less money whilst also including integrated graphics. [Jun '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The i5-11600K is the best value "top tier" CPU in Intel’s 11th Gen Rocket Lake-S lineup. With a simple overclock it offers almost the same levels of performance as the 11900K. Rocket Lake brings higher IPC (early samples indicate +19%) which translates to around a 10% faster Effective Speed than both Intel's 10th Gen and AMD’s 5000 series. Despite Intel’s performance lead, AMD continues to outsell Intel. Given the scale of Intel's operation, it’s inexplicable that their marketing remains so neglected. Little effort is made to counter widespread disinformation such as: “it uses too much electricity” or the classic: “it needs more cores”. Intel’s marketing samples are routinely distributed to reviewers that appear better incentivized to bury Intel's products rather than review them. Not enabling XMP or only testing with BIOS power limits enabled is akin to leaving the handbrake on during a race. Mind-numbing “scientific” and rendering benchmarks are presented as gospel. Different games, mostly unplayed by real users, are cherry picked for each “review”. When it's convenient, canned game benchmarks are chosen such as Ulletical’s CSGO which runs at nearly double the in-game fps. Credible benchmark data, which necessarily includes replicable video footage from popular games, is the exception rather than the rule. At every release, AMD’s marketers coordinate narratives to ensure another feast of blue blubber. Nonetheless, towards the end of 2021, Intel’s Golden Cove is due to offer an additional 20-30% performance increase. At that time, with a net 30-40% performance lead, Intel will probably regain significant market share despite AMD's class-leading marketing. In the meantime, most PC gamers need look no further than the 11400F. [Mar '21 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
153,026
43,966
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback