IntelBX80637I33225
AMDFD6100WMGUSBX

2 Cores, 4 Threads @3.3GHz, Ivy Bridge.
Release date: Q3 2012.

6 Cores, 6 Threads @3.3GHz, Bulldozer.
Release date: Q4 2011.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 48,208 user samples
3,345 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 66% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 48% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 48% Great: 66%
SPEED RANK: 616th / 1456
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
44,863 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 60% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 41% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 41% Great: 60%
SPEED RANK: 715th / 1456
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
58.5 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+9%
53.5 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
80.9 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+5%
76.8 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
82.7 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+48%
55.7 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
145 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+44%
101 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
211 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+23%
171 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
214 Pts 215 Pts +0%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
93.3 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+11%
84 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
91.8 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+36%
67.3 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
173 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+40%
124 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
232 Pts Slightly faster OC quad-core speed.
+10%
211 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
232 Pts 269 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+16%
Market Share
Based on 68,122,976 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0 % 0.01 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
Value
Value For Money
56.1 % 78.9 % Much better value.
+41%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
51 % 54 % Slightly more popular.
+6%
Price
Price (score)
$325 $68 Much cheaper.
+79%
Age
Newest
142 Months Slightly more recent.
+7%
152 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
55 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+42%
95 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
2 cores 6 cores Hugely higher core count.
+200%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
4 threads 6 threads Much higher thread count.
+50%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
22 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+31%
32 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.3 GHz 3.3 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
3.3 GHz 3.9 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+18%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
233 Pts 269 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+15%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
215 Pts 219 Pts +2%
Series
CPU Architecture
Ivy Bridge Bulldozer
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1155 AM3+
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
HD 4000 None
ADVERTISEMENT

The Core i3-3225 Ivy Bridge processor offers both superb real world performance and excellent value for money. For raw single threaded performance the i3-3225 scores 28% lower than the i7-3770K but costs less than half as much. At first glance one might assume that I am crazy for recommending a puny Core-i3 over the mighty Core-i7's but for real world consumer use there is simply no point in having 4 cores and 8 threads, they will hardly ever be used. All of the third gen Ivy Bridge Core-i3s are superb but the i3-3225 sports the slightly more 3D capable HD 4000 Graphics vs the HD 2500 offered on the other models. For real-world performance in an energy efficient package with modest on-board graphics, this is a superb choice. For most use cases including: email, surfing, watching movies, listening to music and office apps, this processor will deliver almost as good an experience as any other processor on the market. [Jun '13 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD FX-6100 has six processing cores, which is above average for a desktop CPU. Single and dual core performance is weak scoring amongst the bottom 30% of desktop processors. Multi core performance is better but still barely above the bottom 10% of processors. At nearly three years of age, the FX-6100 struggles to compete with more recent CPUs. [Mar '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback