COMPARE
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
IntelBX8071513100F
AMDFD9370FHHKWOF
VS
▲ 532,352 ▼

8 Cores, 8 Threads @4.4GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q3 2013.

Effective Speed 
+54%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 10,051 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
997 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 101% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 90% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 90% Great: 101%
SPEED RANK: 104th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
9,054 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 70% Base clock 5 GHz
Worst Bench: 55% Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Poor: 55% Great: 70%
SPEED RANK: 540th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		96 % Much faster effective speed.
+54% 		62.5 %
Average Score 
+120%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		83.2 Pts +1% 82.3 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		179 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+164% 		67.7 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		335 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+162% 		128 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		589 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+154% 		232 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		828 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+118% 		380 Pts
Overclocked Score 
+93%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		91.2 Pts 92.1 Pts +1%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		186 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+126% 		82.2 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		361 Pts Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
+128% 		158 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		667 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+130% 		290 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		864 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+80% 		481 Pts
Value & Sentiment 
+∞%
Market Share
Based on 67,792,911 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.09 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞% 		0 %
Value
Value For Money 		124 % Much better value.
+80% 		69 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		87 % Much more popular.
+64% 		53 %
Price
Price (score) 		$110 Much cheaper.
+43% 		$194
Nice To Haves 
+32%
Age
Newest 		16 Months Hugely more recent.
+88% 		130 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		58 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+74% 		220 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		4 cores 8 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		8 threads 8 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		10 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+69% 		32 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		3.4 GHz 4.4 GHz Faster base frequency.
+29%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		4.5 GHz 4.7 GHz +4%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		866 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+80% 		482 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		832 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+116% 		386 Pts
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Raptor Lake Piledriver
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		FCLGA1700 AM3+
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		None None
Conclusion 
Average Bench 96%
Average Bench 62.5%
ADVERTISEMENT

The Raptor Lake Intel i3-13100F is practically identical to its predecessor, the 12100F. They both feature four hyper-threaded Golden Cove P-cores. The only differences are a 100 MHz base and a 200 MHz boost clock increase which result in a 2% effective speed improvement. With an MSRP of $110 USD, The i3-13100F is the obvious choice for entry level gaming builds. It offers performance that almost matches the previous generations, higher tier, i5-12400F. Since Intel don’t care for long term relationships with PC hardware influencers, for product launches, they often end up sponsoring influencers that are mostly funded by AMD. As a result, Intel rarely get positive marketing coverage beyond launch, and their products remain relatively under priced compared to AMD. When paired with a DDR4 motherboard the 13100F/13400F CPUs (at MSRP) offer unbeatable/good value to entry/mid level PC gamers. High end gamers should investigate the 13600K, which thanks to both higher clocks and higher IPC (Raptor Cove), is around 15% faster than the 13400F. [Jan '23 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The FX-9370 is the slightly lower clocked (4.4 GHz) version of AMD's flagship FX-9 range of desktop processors. The FX-9590 comes clocked at 4.7 GHz with a staggering turbo clock of 5 GHz. Comparing the 9370 and 9590 versions shows that there is only 3% between the two processors at stock clocks but when overclocked they both have an identical performance profile. Given that the 9590 costs nearly 25% more the 9370 should be the obvious choice. Both of these processors have superb multi-core performance but they both lag Intel when it comes to single and dual-core workloads. Until AMD can improve single core performance they will continue to struggle in the high end PC market. [Mar '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
997
9,054
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback