COMPARE
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
IntelBX8071513100F
AMDFD832EWMHKBOX
▲ 932,919 ▼

4 Cores, 8 Threads @3.4GHz, Raptor Lake.
Release date: Q1 2023.

VS
▲ 542,883 ▼

8 Cores, 8 Threads @3.2GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q3 2014.

Effective Speed 
+66%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 34,196 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
997 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 101% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 90% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 90% Great: 101%
SPEED RANK: 121st / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
33,199 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 65% Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 47% Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 47% Great: 65%
SPEED RANK: 641st / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		96 % Much faster effective speed.
+66% 		57.8 %
Average Score 
+161%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		83.2 Pts +3% 80.6 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		179 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+204% 		58.8 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		335 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+210% 		108 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		589 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+208% 		191 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		828 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+178% 		298 Pts
Overclocked Score 
+129%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		91.2 Pts 91.4 Pts +0%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		186 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+164% 		70.4 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		361 Pts Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
+169% 		134 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		667 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+180% 		238 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		864 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+134% 		370 Pts
Value & Sentiment 
+103%
Market Share
Based on 69,000,564 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.08 % Hugely higher market share.
+300% 		0.02 %
Value
Value For Money 		136 % Much better value.
+58% 		86 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		93 % Much more popular.
+72% 		54 %
Price
Price (score) 		$79 $65 Cheaper.
+17%
Nice To Haves 
+46%
Age
Newest 		22 Months Hugely more recent.
+82% 		122 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		58 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+39% 		95 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		4 cores 8 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		8 threads 8 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		10 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+69% 		32 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		3.4 GHz Slightly faster base frequency.
+6% 		3.2 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		4.5 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+12% 		4 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		866 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+129% 		378 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		832 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+173% 		305 Pts
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Raptor Lake Piledriver
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		FCLGA1700 AM3+
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		None None
Conclusion 
Average Bench 96%
Average Bench 57.8%

The Raptor Lake Intel i3-13100F is practically identical to its predecessor, the 12100F. They both feature four hyper-threaded Golden Cove P-cores. The only differences are a 100 MHz base and a 200 MHz boost clock increase which result in a 2% effective speed improvement. With an MSRP of $110 USD, The i3-13100F is the obvious choice for entry level gaming builds. It offers performance that almost matches the previous generations, higher tier, i5-12400F. Since Intel don’t care for long term relationships with PC hardware influencers, for product launches, they often end up sponsoring influencers that are mostly funded by AMD. As a result, Intel rarely get positive marketing coverage beyond launch, and their products remain relatively under priced compared to AMD. When paired with a DDR4 motherboard the 13100F/13400F CPUs (at MSRP) offer unbeatable/good value to entry/mid level PC gamers. High end gamers should investigate the 13600K, which thanks to both higher clocks and higher IPC (Raptor Cove), is around 15% faster than the 13400F. [Jan '23 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The FX-8320E is a Vishera eight core processor based on AMD’s Piledriver architecture. The ‘E’ in the FX-8320E denotes energy efficiency with the FX-8320E boasting a TDP of 95 Watts which is relatively low for FX processors. The FX-8320E was launched in September 2014 at the same time as the FX-8370E. Comparing the 8370E and 8320E shows that the performance profiles are similar with the 25% more expensive 8370E edging ahead, particularly on single core workloads. The 8370E is clocked slightly higher with base/turbo frequencies of 3.3/4.3 GHz versus the 8320E’s 3.2/4.0 GHz. Overall the 8320E scores a mediocre effective speed of 70. Whilst this is sufficient for the majority of desktop applications: web-surfing, word-processing and playing movies, better single-core performance is offered by any number of Intel processors. [Dec '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
997
33,199
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback