Today's hottest deals
IntelBX80768245K
AMD100-100000031BOX

14 Cores, 14 Threads @4.2GHz, Arrow Lake.
Release date: Q4 2024.

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.6GHz, Zen2.
Release date: Q3 2019.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 1,072,648 user samples
9 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 129% Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 91% Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Poor: 91% Great: 129%
SPEED RANK: 32nd / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 145%
UFO
1,072,639 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 92% Base clock 4.45 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 73% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 73% Great: 92%
SPEED RANK: 219th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
117 % Much faster effective speed.
+40%
83.1 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
53.3 Pts 76.3 Pts Much lower memory latency.
+43%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
190 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+43%
133 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
423 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+63%
259 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
960 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+99%
483 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
1,843 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+133%
792 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
68.8 Pts 87.5 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+27%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
258 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+83%
141 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
492 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+75%
281 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
1,003 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+84%
546 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1,909 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+120%
869 Pts
Market Share
Based on 69,047,067 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.02 % 1.12 % Insanely higher market share.
+5,500%
Value
Value For Money
112 % 113 % +1%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
53 % 93 % Much more popular.
+75%
Price
Price (score)
$319 $90 Much cheaper.
+72%
Age
Newest
0 Months Hugely more recent.
+100%
64 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
125 Watts 65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+48%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
14 cores Hugely higher core count.
+133%
6 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
14 threads Higher thread count.
+17%
12 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
3 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+57%
7 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
4.2 GHz Faster base frequency.
+17%
3.6 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
5.2 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+24%
4.2 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
3,066 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+181%
1,091 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
2,924 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+193%
999 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Arrow Lake Zen2
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1851 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
4Xe None

These early benchmarks, which were probably leaked by marketers, indicate the best-case scenario for Intel’s new Arrow Lake desktop processors. The new chiplet-based design results in around 90 ns of memory latency, compared to around 60 ns on Intel’s 12th, 13th and 14th generations. Consequently, gaming performance on the 200 series (like AMD Ryzen) is susceptible to frame drops. Meanwhile, Intel’s 13600K and 14600K continue to offer almost unparalleled real-world gaming performance for around $200 USD. Spending more money on a gaming CPU is normally a waste of money as games are rarely CPU bound under real-world conditions. Without significant improvements in social media marketing: forums, reddit, youtube etc., Intel now faces the very real risk of bankruptcy (third worst-performing S&P500 stock from Jan to Aug 2024). [Oct '24 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

AMD’s Ryzen 5 3600 is a 6-core, 12-threaded processor which succeeds the Ryzen 5 2600 improving upon it by 13% in terms of overclocked performance. The 3600 is in competition with Intel’s 6-core i5-9600K. AMD continues to push the multi-core performance envelope: benchmarks show that the 3600 has a 27% overclocked 64-core lead over the 9600K but that the i5-9600K leads by 14% on single to hex core workloads which translates to 10% higher EFps in most of the today’s top games (e.g. PUBG, GTAV and CSGO). Additionally, the 3600's memory controller, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency which adversely impacts gaming. Weaknesses in memory architecture are not readily picked up by CPU benchmarks but they are apparent whilst gaming. Cheaper CPUs such as the 9400F deliver better gaming performance in nearly all of today’s popular games. At $190 USD, the 3600 offers good value for purely workstation tasks such as film production but streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. The masterfully hyped Ryzen 3600 may well be the best CPU for multimedia producers on a tight budget but in today's market there are faster and less expensive alternatives for gamers, streamers and general desktop users. [Jun '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback