AMDYD195XA8AEWOF
IntelBX80673I77800X

16 Cores, 32 Threads @3.4GHz, Zen.
Release date: Q3 2017.

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.50 GHz, Skylake.
Release date ≈ Q2 2017.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 45,975 user samples
23,641 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 85% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 68% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 68% Great: 85%
SPEED RANK: 292nd / 1456
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
22,334 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 87% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 69% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Poor: 69% Great: 87%
SPEED RANK: 275th / 1456
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
76.7 % 77.9 % +2%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
69.3 Pts 74.4 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+7%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
115 Pts 117 Pts +2%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
228 Pts 229 Pts +0%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
450 Pts +3% 437 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
876 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+19%
736 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
83.4 Pts 83.5 Pts +0%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
125 Pts 134 Pts Slightly faster OC single-core speed.
+7%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
247 Pts 265 Pts Slightly faster OC dual-core speed.
+7%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
493 Pts 512 Pts +4%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
981 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+17%
835 Pts
Market Share
Based on 68,124,341 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.01 % 0.05 % Hugely higher market share.
+400%
Value
Value For Money
81.3 % 84.7 % +4%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
63 % More popular.
+21%
52 %
Price
Price (score)
$225 $206 Slightly cheaper.
+9%
Age
Newest
82 Months +1% 83+ Months
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
2521 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+136%
1069 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
2190 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+133%
939 Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

AMD’s 16 core, 32 thread Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is finally here to seize the throne for high end desktop processors. The 1950X is the flagship of the Zen based Threadripper series which also includes the 12 core 1920X and the 8 core 1900X. The 1950X has a stock clock of 3.4 GHz increasing to a maximum single core boost of 4.0 GHz and features quad channel DDR4 and 64 PCI Express lanes. This processor is effectively two Ryzen 7 1800Xs glued together with Infinity Fabric (AMD’s scalable interconnecting technology), making the 1950X one of the physically largest CPUs on the consumer market. If you are considering this CPU, you will need a new X399 motherboard with a TR4 socket. Early benchmarks show the 1950X competing with Intel’s similarly priced i9-7900X. Whilst the 7900X has slightly higher single and quad core scores (10%-15%), the 1950X is around 35% faster for multi-core workloads. Content creators, and other core intensive task masters will not be disappointed. [Aug '17 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Completely outclassed by the 8700k which is cheaper and faster. RIP Skylake-X [May '18 koopahermit]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback