TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD

AMD YD195XA8AEWOF

Ryzen TR 1950X

▲ 631,835 ▼

16 Cores, 32 Threads @3.4GHz, Zen.
Release date: Q3 2017.

Average Bench: 76.7% (295th of 1459)

Based on 23,641 user benchmarks.  Device: 178BFBFF00800F11 Model: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 16-Core Processor

AMD’s 16 core, 32 thread Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is finally here to seize the throne for high end desktop processors. The 1950X is the flagship of the Zen based Threadripper series which also includes the 12 core 1920X and the 8 core 1900X. The 1950X has a stock clock of 3.4 GHz increasing to a maximum single core boost of 4.0 GHz and features quad channel DDR4 and 64 PCI Express lanes. This processor is effectively two Ryzen 7 1800Xs glued together with Infinity Fabric (AMD’s scalable interconnecting technology), making the 1950X one of the physically largest CPUs on the consumer market. If you are considering this CPU, you will need a new X399 motherboard with a TR4 socket. Early benchmarks show the 1950X competing with Intel’s similarly priced i9-7900X. Whilst the 7900X has slightly higher single and quad core scores (10%-15%), the 1950X is around 35% faster for multi-core workloads. Content creators, and other core intensive task masters will not be disappointed. [Aug '17 CPUPro]

Poor: 68%Average: 76.7% Great: 85%
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Popular builds with this CPU

Good average bench

The AMD Ryzen TR 1950X averaged 23.3% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the AMD Ryzen TR 1950X near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Multi Core Speed 2,190Pts
Avg. Quad Core Speed 450Pts

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD Ryzen TR 1950X is just 17%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD Ryzen TR 1950X performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Memory Latency 69.3Pts
Avg. Octa Core Speed 876Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 23,641 samples)
Rank 29576.7%
Min Avg Max
57.2 Memory 69.3 83.4
103 1-Core 115 125
201 2-Core 228 247
75.1% 138 Pts
Min Avg Max
388 4-Core 450 493
706 8-Core 876 981
78.6% 663 Pts
Min Avg Max
1,209 64-Core 2,190 2,521
136% 2,190 Pts
User Benchmarks BenchNormalHeavyServer
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
81% Excellent
Memory 78.8
1-Core 115
2-Core 228
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 871
78% 659 Pts
64-Core 2,298
142% 2,298 Pts
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
79.9% Very good
Memory 74.4
1-Core 113
2-Core 229
76% 139 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 898
80% 678 Pts
64-Core 2,316
143% 2,316 Pts
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
79.2% Very good
Memory 73.1
1-Core 116
2-Core 228
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 904
80% 680 Pts
64-Core 2,278
141% 2,278 Pts
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
77.3% Very good
Memory 69.3
1-Core 114
2-Core 229
75% 138 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 912
81% 684 Pts
64-Core 2,244
139% 2,244 Pts
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
75.5% Very good
Memory 67.7
1-Core 115
2-Core 228
74% 137 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 891
79% 668 Pts
64-Core 2,250
139% 2,250 Pts
23,641 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,303,948 CPUs tested

 Prices

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

MSRP ≈ $1000 @ launch in Aug '17
EbayUS $2254 months
AmazonUS $46819 mins
BHPhotoUS $5705 years
Send price feedback
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Ryzen TR 1950X Builds (Compare 435 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME - $29

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD  $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples249x
GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia  $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples98x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia  $365Bench 156%, 357,946 samples33x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia  $565Bench 204%, 155,335 samples27x
SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples22x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $316Bench 327%, 38,669 samples20x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $147Bench 297%, 331,647 samples16x
RAM
F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 105%, 6,151 samples17x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL  $105Bench 91%, 87,239 samples17x
F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 109%, 1,628 samples9x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $848

Popular Ryzen TR 1950X compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

CPUPro
Avatar level
2,080

Official site www.amd.com/...

Compose music, orchestrate fleets, conquer design and game...

Added 6 years ago.
USA-User
Avatar level
9,918

Liked (edit your comment) Add link

9 months ago.

DEU-User
Avatar level
5,793

Excellent

3 years ago.

Too slow due to caching problems.

CAN-User
Avatar level
5,010

Good

6 months ago.

There is no competition with this CPU. Same price as i9-7900X yet 20% faster, consumes less power, and produces less heat.

IDN-User
Avatar level
4,673

Good

12 months ago.

Affrodable price, extreme performance and quality.

PHL-User
Avatar level
3,420

Excellent

5 years ago.

For the price and higher end performance, it's way more cheaper than its other competitors.

BGR-User
Avatar level
2,916

Excellent

4 years ago.

this is bad cpu becase have 16 cores and power on this cpu= intel i7 8700K he is 6core

ZAF-User
Avatar level
2,826

Excellent

5 years ago.

thread-ripper more like intel-ripper

SRB-User
Avatar level
2,820

Excellent

6 years ago.

900$ vs 2000$ i9? for 11% more perf?

SWE-User
Avatar level
2,802

Disliked

5 years ago.

Comment  amdvsintel2017.blogspot.com/...

"Intel 7900x wins and is way stronger and faster quad core and way stronger and faster singel core better even for gaming aswell and better as desktop computer and uses 22 percent less energy and were cheaper compared to Amd tr 1950x" "I just looked at gaming benchmark and stopped reading there because as i thought Intel CPUs are killing Thread Ripper in gaming. As far as content creation, naturally having 16/32 setup will be faster than Intel 10/20 but again do you really need more than 10/20 cores. I don't and i heavily use PC for gaming, programming, web design, video/audio encoding. Overall Intel 7900x is better value and all around CPU. But if you are just in gaming 7700k is just enough. Thanks for review, and hello x299 platform. Gaming vs. Content Creation mode through Software is just another big NO NO to me knowing how crappy AMD software is.I love Intel even more...all you have to do pop CPU in and stuff works and it works well."

SVK-User
Avatar level
2,472

Good

5 years ago.

For peoples with photo studio, film creators best buy. :)

CPUPro
Avatar level
2,080

Good

6 years ago.

CHN-User
Avatar level
2,070

Excellent

5 years ago.

Really nice high performance multicore CPU.

Comment 

I was lurking around in this site just now and wanted to see Threadripper benchmarks since I thought it was already released. Well it is - it's 9:40 AM EST August 10, the release date for Threadripper CPUs, and it seems like I'm viewing the FIRST ever benchmark of one of those cards right here. According to this one benchmark, the CPU scores 111% average bench, 111% gaming, 109% desktop, and a whopping 171% workstation. I don't know if I should be surprised by this, since the Ryzen 5 1600 and the Ryzen 3's have already impressed us so much. For reference the 20c/40t E5-2698 v4 scores a 134% for workstation.—Aug '17

LKA-User
Avatar level
1,934

Excellent

6 years ago.

Thread ripper gets more points as most software is not geared to use all 16 cores to achieve full benefits. and trying to show 140 watts for 10 cores and 180 watts for 16 cores is rubbish. i9 uses 14 watts/core where as ryzen is 11.25 watts per core

CUB-User
Avatar level
500

Excellent

6 years ago.

La mejor opción en rendimiento precio.

demonslayer
Avatar level
32

Excellent

6 years ago.

Extremely fast

Syr_Hyena
Avatar level
12

Excellent

6 years ago.

I absolutely love this CPU - it manages to chew through rendering (hobby) & data analysis & ML (work) tasks like no tomorrow, and manages to put my R7 1800X to shame even in single threaded performance (better ram support helps a LOT - managed to get it running at 3466MTs). On top of that, its been beating my 1080tis in Blender Cycles rendering. The huge amount of PCIe bandwidth and memory bandwidth is also absolutely wonderful. Plus, it runs games just fine (Though I'm gpu bottlenecked on my current setup, since I run at 4k) All for just $999!

3D1Nh0
Avatar level
8

Good

5 years ago.

This is my first AMD since more than a decade.

mtstans
Avatar level
6

Excellent

6 years ago.

Really happy with my new Threadripper build.

Hapkido666
Avatar level
2

Good

6 years ago.

Price point now massively better and the benchmark software is now being optimised for Ryzen so scores will improve over the already max optimised intel variants.

Dumbster
Avatar level
2

Excellent

5 years ago.

I love how fast it is and how much it can handle. Editing is a breeze, and it alows me to get stuff done, fast.

AcidTrapman
Avatar level
2

Good

4 years ago.

High power consumption when overclocked. Great Work Station performance.

sinxcosx
Avatar level
2

Excellent

4 years ago.

This is an awesome cpu. Whatever I through at it, the processor practically implements with super high speed. I use this component mainly for gaming in 4K. For the time being, I wouldn't trade this cpu for anything.

Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 6 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Intel Core i5-12600K
vs Intel Core i5-12400F
vs Intel Core i5-13600K
vs Intel Core i7-14700K
vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
vs Intel Core i3-13100F
vs Intel Core i7-13700K
vs Intel Core i5-12400
vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600

1459 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback