TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD

AMD YD195XA8AEWOF

Ryzen TR 1950X

▲ 911,602 ▼

16 Cores, 32 Threads @3.4GHz, Zen.
Release date: Q3 2017.

VS

Average Bench: 106% (23rd of 1147)

Based on 10,870 user benchmarks.  Device: 178BFBFF00800F11 Model: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 16-Core Processor

AMD’s 16 core, 32 thread Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is finally here to seize the throne for high end desktop processors. The 1950X is the flagship of the Zen based Threadripper series which also includes the 12 core 1920X and the 8 core 1900X. The 1950X has a stock clock of 3.4 GHz increasing to a maximum single core boost of 4.0 GHz and features quad channel DDR4 and 64 PCI Express lanes. This processor is effectively two Ryzen 7 1800Xs glued together with Infinity Fabric (AMD’s scalable interconnecting technology), making the 1950X one of the physically largest CPUs on the consumer market. If you are considering this CPU, you will need a new X399 motherboard with a TR4 socket. Early benchmarks show the 1950X competing with Intel’s similarly priced i9-7900X. Whilst the 7900X has slightly higher single and quad core scores (10%-15%), the 1950X is around 35% faster for multi-core workloads. Content creators, and other core intensive task masters will not be disappointed. [Aug '17 CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT
Poor: 88%Average: 106% Great: 118%
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 163%
UFO

Popular builds with this CPU

Outstanding average bench

The AMD Ryzen TR 1950X averaged 5.9% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the AMD Ryzen TR 1950X near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Multi Core Integer Speed 2,196Pts
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed 2,249Pts

Above average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD Ryzen TR 1950X is 30.5%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD Ryzen TR 1950X performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Single Core Integer Speed 106Pts
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed 110Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 10,870 samples)
Rank 23106%
Min Avg Max
94.8 SC Int 106 116
102 SC Float 114 124
97.2 SC Mixed 110 120
88.1% 110 Pts
Min Avg Max
363 QC Int 414 454
372 QC Float 447 493
359 QC Mixed 429 472
97.4% 430 Pts
Min Avg Max
1,174 MC Int 2,196 2,578
1,217 MC Float 2,290 2,677
1,210 MC Mixed 2,249 2,647
336% 2,245 Pts
User Benchmarks Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
117% Outstanding
SC Int 113
SC Float 123
SC Mixed 117
94% 118 Pts
QC Int 454
QC Float 493
QC Mixed 461
106% 469 Pts
MC Int 2,394
MC Float 2,491
MC Mixed 2,643
376% 2,510 Pts
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
59.5% Above average
SC Int 70.1
SC Float 66.5
SC Mixed 63.6
53% 66.7 Pts
QC Int 265
QC Float 259
QC Mixed 256
59% 260 Pts
MC Int 1,059
MC Float 1,262
MC Mixed 1,094
170% 1,138 Pts
10,870 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 16,460,134 CPUs tested.

 Prices

Approx. $1000 @ launch in Aug '17
EbayUS $5301 hr
BHPhotoUS $5703 months
AmazonUS $58557 mins
Send price feedback
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Ryzen TR 1950X Builds (Compare 3,017 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 142%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 157%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME - $506

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD  $530Bench 106%, 10,870 samples2,068x
GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia  $808Bench 151%, 310,584 samples1,269x
GTX 1080Nvidia  $528Bench 121%, 460,256 samples387x
RTX 2080 TiNvidia  $1,200Bench 199%, 26,386 samples178x
SSD
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung  $170Bench 281%, 32,182 samples361x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $140Bench 218%, 76,035 samples281x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $249Bench 280%, 8,180 samples238x
RAM
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 96%, 12,004 samples174x
F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 107%, 1,995 samples128x
F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 132%, 361 samples113x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $2,014

Popular Ryzen TR 1950X compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop Workstation

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2019 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical consumers. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating which is geared towards gamers. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

CPUPro
Avatar level
1,227

Official site www.amd.com/...

Compose music, orchestrate fleets, conquer design and game...

Added 20 months ago.
USA-User
Avatar level
5,070

Excellent (edit your comment) Add link

14 days ago.

Solid CPU with great multi core capability

DEU-User
Avatar level
3,331

Good

1 day ago.

Too slow due to caching problems.

GBR-User
Avatar level
3,268

Excellent

6 days ago.

Beast!

CAN-User
Avatar level
2,784

Good

3 months ago.

There is no competition with this CPU. Same price as i9-7900X yet 20% faster, consumes less power, and produces less heat.

FRA-User
Avatar level
2,701

Good

30 days ago.

Amazing beast for a workstation

IDN-User
Avatar level
2,465

Excellent

4 months ago.

Affrodable price, extreme performance and quality.

PHL-User
Avatar level
1,716

Excellent

11 months ago.

For the price and higher end performance, it's way more cheaper than its other competitors.

BGR-User
Avatar level
1,686

Excellent

9 months ago.

this is bad cpu becase have 16 cores and power on this cpu= intel i7 8700K he is 6core

SRB-User
Avatar level
1,658

Excellent

10 months ago.

900$ vs 2000$ i9? for 11% more perf?

SWE-User
Avatar level
1,642

Disliked

4 months ago.

Comment  amdvsintel2017.blogspot.com/...

"Intel 7900x wins and is way stronger and faster quad core and way stronger and faster singel core better even for gaming aswell and better as desktop computer and uses 22 percent less energy and were cheaper compared to Amd tr 1950x" "I just looked at gaming benchmark and stopped reading there because as i thought Intel CPUs are killing Thread Ripper in gaming. As far as content creation, naturally having 16/32 setup will be faster than Intel 10/20 but again do you really need more than 10/20 cores. I don't and i heavily use PC for gaming, programming, web design, video/audio encoding. Overall Intel 7900x is better value and all around CPU. But if you are just in gaming 7700k is just enough. Thanks for review, and hello x299 platform. Gaming vs. Content Creation mode through Software is just another big NO NO to me knowing how crappy AMD software is.I love Intel even more...all you have to do pop CPU in and stuff works and it works well."

SVK-User
Avatar level
1,536

Good

7 months ago.

For peoples with photo studio, film creators best buy. :)

ZAF-User
Avatar level
1,458

Excellent

7 months ago.

thread-ripper more like intel-ripper

CPUPro
Avatar level
1,227

Good

20 months ago.

CHN-User
Avatar level
1,150

Excellent

17 days ago.

Really nice high performance multicore CPU.

Comment 

I was lurking around in this site just now and wanted to see Threadripper benchmarks since I thought it was already released. Well it is - it's 9:40 AM EST August 10, the release date for Threadripper CPUs, and it seems like I'm viewing the FIRST ever benchmark of one of those cards right here. According to this one benchmark, the CPU scores 111% average bench, 111% gaming, 109% desktop, and a whopping 171% workstation. I don't know if I should be surprised by this, since the Ryzen 5 1600 and the Ryzen 3's have already impressed us so much. For reference the 20c/40t E5-2698 v4 scores a 134% for workstation.—Aug '17

LKA-User
Avatar level
866

Excellent

12 months ago.

Thread ripper gets more points as most software is not geared to use all 16 cores to achieve full benefits. and trying to show 140 watts for 10 cores and 180 watts for 16 cores is rubbish. i9 uses 14 watts/core where as ryzen is 11.25 watts per core

gvrax
Avatar level
360

Terrible

19 months ago.

low perfomance for that price

CUB-User
Avatar level
278

Excellent

16 months ago.

La mejor opción en rendimiento precio.

quantumniko
Avatar level
272

Excellent

13 months ago.

PRICE!!!

raminro
Avatar level
80

Excellent

19 months ago.

boys boysSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS ON RYZEN ONLY USE DUAL CHANNEL NOT 2*SINGLE ON THREADRIPPR ONLY USE QUAD CHANNEL NOT 2*DUAL inside ram,(hardware ,IC and pcb )single,dual,quad not same ,completly diffrante ,, many people think = dual =2*single channel ram or quad =4* dual ram you must use only ram, write on box QUAD for threadripper (dual for ryzen) if you put wrong ram your system cant start , even if start , hiccops rip in windows, harm your cpu change your ram to this gskill ripjaws4 4*8 3200=250$ or gskil ripjaws4 4*4 2400=150$ از رم تک روی رایزن و زوتا دوال رو تریدریپر پرهیز کنید ، روشن نمیشه ، بشه هم لگ و سکسکه میده ، فقط رم درجه یک جی اسکیل یا ژل و لاغیر amd ryzen is very very very exclent,smooth,powerfull but need no1 true chanell ram

demonslayer
Avatar level
32

Excellent

20 months ago.

Extremely fast

frootyninja
Avatar level
18

Good

12 months ago.

Intel has an 18 core processor that gets about 10% more performance than this, but it is $1000 more. Not sure who in their right mind would buy an intel i9 over Ryzen options when the price is so different and performance not so much. I love intel for gaming and have the i7-8700K, but for video editors and/or media professionals AMD is the clear winner in this category for best value.

Syr_Hyena
Avatar level
12

Excellent

20 months ago.

I absolutely love this CPU - it manages to chew through rendering (hobby) & data analysis & ML (work) tasks like no tomorrow, and manages to put my R7 1800X to shame even in single threaded performance (better ram support helps a LOT - managed to get it running at 3466MTs). On top of that, its been beating my 1080tis in Blender Cycles rendering. The huge amount of PCIe bandwidth and memory bandwidth is also absolutely wonderful. Plus, it runs games just fine (Though I'm gpu bottlenecked on my current setup, since I run at 4k) All for just $999!

mtstans
Avatar level
6

Excellent

15 months ago.

Really happy with my new Threadripper build.

Hapkido666
Avatar level
2

Good

9 months ago.

Price point now massively better and the benchmark software is now being optimised for Ryzen so scores will improve over the already max optimised intel variants.

Dumbster
Avatar level
2

Excellent

7 months ago.

I love how fast it is and how much it can handle. Editing is a breeze, and it alows me to get stuff done, fast.

Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Over the hill
Age: 20 months

Speed Comparisons

vs Intel Core i7-8700K
vs AMD Ryzen 5 2600
vs AMD Ryzen 5 1600
vs AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs Intel Core i5-8600K
vs Intel Core i7-7700K
vs AMD Ryzen 7 1700
vs Intel Core i5-8400
vs AMD Ryzen 5 1600X

1147 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
What is the GeekBench score?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $379Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $165Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $106
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $117Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $93
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $95SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $78G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $711SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $100SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay Newegg
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Test your PC Build a PC
Can You Run It?
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback