TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD

AMD YD195XA8AEWOF

Ryzen TR 1950X

▲ 631,802 ▼

16 Cores, 32 Threads @3.4GHz, Zen.
Release date: Q3 2017.

Average Bench: 74.6% (209th of 1276)

Based on 19,345 user benchmarks.  Device: 178BFBFF00800F11 Model: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 16-Core Processor

AMD’s 16 core, 32 thread Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is finally here to seize the throne for high end desktop processors. The 1950X is the flagship of the Zen based Threadripper series which also includes the 12 core 1920X and the 8 core 1900X. The 1950X has a stock clock of 3.4 GHz increasing to a maximum single core boost of 4.0 GHz and features quad channel DDR4 and 64 PCI Express lanes. This processor is effectively two Ryzen 7 1800Xs glued together with Infinity Fabric (AMD’s scalable interconnecting technology), making the 1950X one of the physically largest CPUs on the consumer market. If you are considering this CPU, you will need a new X399 motherboard with a TR4 socket. Early benchmarks show the 1950X competing with Intel’s similarly priced i9-7900X. Whilst the 7900X has slightly higher single and quad core scores (10%-15%), the 1950X is around 35% faster for multi-core workloads. Content creators, and other core intensive task masters will not be disappointed. [Aug '17 CPUPro]

Poor: 64%Average: 74.6% Great: 84%
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

Popular builds with this CPU

Good average bench

The AMD Ryzen TR 1950X averaged 25.3% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed 2,201Pts
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed 830Pts

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD Ryzen TR 1950X is 20.3%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD Ryzen TR 1950X performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Memory Latency 70.3Pts
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed 423Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 19,345 samples)
Rank 20974.6%
Min Avg Max
58.4 Memory 70.3 86.8
93.9 1-Core 109 118
185 2-Core 215 235
74.2% 131 Pts
Min Avg Max
337 4-Core 423 470
616 8-Core 830 937
77.2% 626 Pts
Min Avg Max
1,088 64-Core 2,201 2,629
148% 2,201 Pts
User Benchmarks Bench Normal Heavy Server
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
77.9% Very good
Memory 72.4
1-Core 116
2-Core 234
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 877
82% 662 Pts
64-Core 2359
158% 2359 Pts
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
74.5% Very good
Memory 67.7
1-Core 110
2-Core 227
75% 135 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 870
80% 653 Pts
64-Core 2,343
157% 2,343 Pts
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
74.2% Very good
Memory 74.5
1-Core 104
2-Core 177
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 730
70% 563 Pts
64-Core 2,295
154% 2,295 Pts
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
73.4% Very good
Memory 65.1
1-Core 109
2-Core 219
73% 131 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 873
81% 655 Pts
64-Core 2,349
158% 2,349 Pts
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
69.6% Good
Memory 61.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 215
72% 130 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 796
75% 607 Pts
64-Core 2,013
135% 2,013 Pts
19,345 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 38,676,321 CPUs tested.

 Prices

MSRP ≈ $1000 @ launch in Aug '17
BHPhotoUS $5702 years
EbayUS $8696 mins
AmazonUS $93924 mins
Send price feedback
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Ryzen TR 1950X Builds (Compare 1,122 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 129%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME - $709

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD  $570Bench 75%, 19,345 samples612x
GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia  $808Bench 136%, 604,866 samples360x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia  $1,264Bench 176%, 242,889 samples167x
GTX 1080Nvidia  $450Bench 106%, 786,866 samples65x
SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $65Bench 273%, 290,013 samples79x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $85Bench 219%, 129,859 samples64x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $140Bench 306%, 195,610 samples56x
RAM
F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 118%, 1,277 samples38x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL  $178Bench 95%, 48,958 samples35x
F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 87%, 10,475 samples22x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $2,151

Popular Ryzen TR 1950X compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2021 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

CPUPro
Avatar level
1,902

Official site www.amd.com/...

Compose music, orchestrate fleets, conquer design and game...

Added 3 years ago.
USA-User
Avatar level
7,350

Excellent (edit your comment) Add link

2 months ago.

Reliable chip, plenty for a "low power" server for rendering videos and compiling large programs.

DEU-User
Avatar level
4,595

Excellent

2 months ago.

Too slow due to caching problems.

CAN-User
Avatar level
3,852

Good

6 months ago.

There is no competition with this CPU. Same price as i9-7900X yet 20% faster, consumes less power, and produces less heat.

FRA-User
Avatar level
3,687

Excellent

14 months ago.

Amazing beast for a workstation

IDN-User
Avatar level
3,657

Excellent

1 month ago.

Affrodable price, extreme performance and quality.

PHL-User
Avatar level
2,472

Excellent

18 months ago.

For the price and higher end performance, it's way more cheaper than its other competitors.

BGR-User
Avatar level
2,304

Excellent

8 months ago.

this is bad cpu becase have 16 cores and power on this cpu= intel i7 8700K he is 6core

SRB-User
Avatar level
2,226

Excellent

2 years ago.

900$ vs 2000$ i9? for 11% more perf?

SWE-User
Avatar level
2,186

Disliked

2 years ago.

Comment  amdvsintel2017.blogspot.com/...

"Intel 7900x wins and is way stronger and faster quad core and way stronger and faster singel core better even for gaming aswell and better as desktop computer and uses 22 percent less energy and were cheaper compared to Amd tr 1950x" "I just looked at gaming benchmark and stopped reading there because as i thought Intel CPUs are killing Thread Ripper in gaming. As far as content creation, naturally having 16/32 setup will be faster than Intel 10/20 but again do you really need more than 10/20 cores. I don't and i heavily use PC for gaming, programming, web design, video/audio encoding. Overall Intel 7900x is better value and all around CPU. But if you are just in gaming 7700k is just enough. Thanks for review, and hello x299 platform. Gaming vs. Content Creation mode through Software is just another big NO NO to me knowing how crappy AMD software is.I love Intel even more...all you have to do pop CPU in and stuff works and it works well."

ZAF-User
Avatar level
2,118

Excellent

2 years ago.

thread-ripper more like intel-ripper

SVK-User
Avatar level
1,990

Good

2 years ago.

For peoples with photo studio, film creators best buy. :)

CPUPro
Avatar level
1,902

Good

3 years ago.

CHN-User
Avatar level
1,584

Excellent

21 months ago.

Really nice high performance multicore CPU.

Comment 

I was lurking around in this site just now and wanted to see Threadripper benchmarks since I thought it was already released. Well it is - it's 9:40 AM EST August 10, the release date for Threadripper CPUs, and it seems like I'm viewing the FIRST ever benchmark of one of those cards right here. According to this one benchmark, the CPU scores 111% average bench, 111% gaming, 109% desktop, and a whopping 171% workstation. I don't know if I should be surprised by this, since the Ryzen 5 1600 and the Ryzen 3's have already impressed us so much. For reference the 20c/40t E5-2698 v4 scores a 134% for workstation.—Aug '17

LKA-User
Avatar level
1,280

Excellent

2 years ago.

Thread ripper gets more points as most software is not geared to use all 16 cores to achieve full benefits. and trying to show 140 watts for 10 cores and 180 watts for 16 cores is rubbish. i9 uses 14 watts/core where as ryzen is 11.25 watts per core

gvrax
Avatar level
372

Terrible

3 years ago.

low perfomance for that price

CUB-User
Avatar level
330

Excellent

3 years ago.

La mejor opción en rendimiento precio.

raminro
Avatar level
80

Excellent

3 years ago.

boys boysSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS ON RYZEN ONLY USE DUAL CHANNEL NOT 2*SINGLE ON THREADRIPPR ONLY USE QUAD CHANNEL NOT 2*DUAL inside ram,(hardware ,IC and pcb )single,dual,quad not same ,completly diffrante ,, many people think = dual =2*single channel ram or quad =4* dual ram you must use only ram, write on box QUAD for threadripper (dual for ryzen) if you put wrong ram your system cant start , even if start , hiccops rip in windows, harm your cpu change your ram to this gskill ripjaws4 4*8 3200=250$ or gskil ripjaws4 4*4 2400=150$ از رم تک روی رایزن و زوتا دوال رو تریدریپر پرهیز کنید ، روشن نمیشه ، بشه هم لگ و سکسکه میده ، فقط رم درجه یک جی اسکیل یا ژل و لاغیر amd ryzen is very very very exclent,smooth,powerfull but need no1 true chanell ram

demonslayer
Avatar level
32

Excellent

3 years ago.

Extremely fast

Syr_Hyena
Avatar level
12

Excellent

3 years ago.

I absolutely love this CPU - it manages to chew through rendering (hobby) & data analysis & ML (work) tasks like no tomorrow, and manages to put my R7 1800X to shame even in single threaded performance (better ram support helps a LOT - managed to get it running at 3466MTs). On top of that, its been beating my 1080tis in Blender Cycles rendering. The huge amount of PCIe bandwidth and memory bandwidth is also absolutely wonderful. Plus, it runs games just fine (Though I'm gpu bottlenecked on my current setup, since I run at 4k) All for just $999!

3D1Nh0
Avatar level
8

Good

19 months ago.

This is my first AMD since more than a decade.

mtstans
Avatar level
6

Excellent

3 years ago.

Really happy with my new Threadripper build.

Hapkido666
Avatar level
2

Good

2 years ago.

Price point now massively better and the benchmark software is now being optimised for Ryzen so scores will improve over the already max optimised intel variants.

Dumbster
Avatar level
2

Excellent

2 years ago.

I love how fast it is and how much it can handle. Editing is a breeze, and it alows me to get stuff done, fast.

AcidTrapman
Avatar level
2

Good

15 months ago.

High power consumption when overclocked. Great Work Station performance.

sinxcosx
Avatar level
2

Excellent

12 months ago.

This is an awesome cpu. Whatever I through at it, the processor practically implements with super high speed. I use this component mainly for gaming in 4K. For the time being, I wouldn't trade this cpu for anything.

Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 3 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Intel Core i5-10600K
vs Intel Core i5-9600K
vs Intel Core i5-10400F
vs Intel Core i3-10100F
vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
vs Intel Core i3-10100
vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs Intel Core i7-10700K
vs AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

1276 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
What is the GeekBench score?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $47Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback