Average Bench: 75.9% (194th of 1264)

Based on 16,291 user benchmarks.  Device: 178BFBFF00800F11 Model: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 16-Core Processor

AMD’s 16 core, 32 thread Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is finally here to seize the throne for high end desktop processors. The 1950X is the flagship of the Zen based Threadripper series which also includes the 12 core 1920X and the 8 core 1900X. The 1950X has a stock clock of 3.4 GHz increasing to a maximum single core boost of 4.0 GHz and features quad channel DDR4 and 64 PCI Express lanes. This processor is effectively two Ryzen 7 1800Xs glued together with Infinity Fabric (AMD’s scalable interconnecting technology), making the 1950X one of the physically largest CPUs on the consumer market. If you are considering this CPU, you will need a new X399 motherboard with a TR4 socket. Early benchmarks show the 1950X competing with Intel’s similarly priced i9-7900X. Whilst the 7900X has slightly higher single and quad core scores (10%-15%), the 1950X is around 35% faster for multi-core workloads. Content creators, and other core intensive task masters will not be disappointed. [Aug '17 CPUPro]

Good average bench

The AMD Ryzen TR 1950X averaged 24.1% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the AMD Ryzen TR 1950X near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed 2,213Pts
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed 840Pts

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD Ryzen TR 1950X is just 19.2%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD Ryzen TR 1950X performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Memory Latency 71.6Pts
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed 217Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 16,291 samples)
Min Avg Max
57.8 Memory 71.6 87.5
99.4 1-Core 110 118
194 2-Core 217 235
75.2% 133 Pts
Min Avg Max
364 4-Core 429 470
662 8-Core 840 934
78.3% 635 Pts
Min Avg Max
1,231 64-Core 2,213 2,610
148% 2,213 Pts
User Benchmarks Bench Normal Heavy Server
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Memory 77.8
1-Core 111
2-Core 220
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 871
81% 655 Pts
64-Core 2,268
152% 2,268 Pts
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Memory 76.5
1-Core 111
2-Core 216
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 875
81% 656 Pts
64-Core 2,319
156% 2,319 Pts
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Memory 81.4
1-Core 100
2-Core 200
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 760
72% 580 Pts
64-Core 2,221
149% 2,221 Pts
16,291 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 33,181,341 CPUs tested.

 Prices

Approx. $1000 @ launch in Aug '17
BHPhotoUS $57020 months
AmazonUS $7491 month
EbayUS $8693 mins
Send price feedback
Typical Ryzen TR 1950X Builds (Compare 744 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME - $709

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $2,171

Popular Ryzen TR 1950X compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2020 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Compose music, orchestrate fleets, conquer design and game...

Added 3 years ago.

Good

2 months ago.

Too slow due to caching problems.


Good

2 months ago.

There is no competition with this CPU. Same price as i9-7900X yet 20% faster, consumes less power, and produces less heat.


Excellent

10 months ago.

Amazing beast for a workstation


Excellent

10 months ago.

Affrodable price, extreme performance and quality.


Excellent

14 months ago.

For the price and higher end performance, it's way more cheaper than its other competitors.


Excellent

4 months ago.

this is bad cpu becase have 16 cores and power on this cpu= intel i7 8700K he is 6core


Excellent

2 years ago.

900$ vs 2000$ i9? for 11% more perf?


Disliked

22 months ago.

Comment  amdvsintel2017.blogspot.com/...

"Intel 7900x wins and is way stronger and faster quad core and way stronger and faster singel core better even for gaming aswell and better as desktop computer and uses 22 percent less energy and were cheaper compared to Amd tr 1950x" "I just looked at gaming benchmark and stopped reading there because as i thought Intel CPUs are killing Thread Ripper in gaming. As far as content creation, naturally having 16/32 setup will be faster than Intel 10/20 but again do you really need more than 10/20 cores. I don't and i heavily use PC for gaming, programming, web design, video/audio encoding. Overall Intel 7900x is better value and all around CPU. But if you are just in gaming 7700k is just enough. Thanks for review, and hello x299 platform. Gaming vs. Content Creation mode through Software is just another big NO NO to me knowing how crappy AMD software is.I love Intel even more...all you have to do pop CPU in and stuff works and it works well."


Excellent

2 years ago.

thread-ripper more like intel-ripper


Good

3 years ago.


Good

2 years ago.

For peoples with photo studio, film creators best buy. :)


Excellent

17 months ago.

Really nice high performance multicore CPU.

Comment 

I was lurking around in this site just now and wanted to see Threadripper benchmarks since I thought it was already released. Well it is - it's 9:40 AM EST August 10, the release date for Threadripper CPUs, and it seems like I'm viewing the FIRST ever benchmark of one of those cards right here. According to this one benchmark, the CPU scores 111% average bench, 111% gaming, 109% desktop, and a whopping 171% workstation. I don't know if I should be surprised by this, since the Ryzen 5 1600 and the Ryzen 3's have already impressed us so much. For reference the 20c/40t E5-2698 v4 scores a 134% for workstation.—Aug '17


Excellent

2 years ago.

Thread ripper gets more points as most software is not geared to use all 16 cores to achieve full benefits. and trying to show 140 watts for 10 cores and 180 watts for 16 cores is rubbish. i9 uses 14 watts/core where as ryzen is 11.25 watts per core


Terrible

2 years ago.

low perfomance for that price


Excellent

2 years ago.

La mejor opción en rendimiento precio.


Excellent

2 years ago.

boys boysSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS ON RYZEN ONLY USE DUAL CHANNEL NOT 2*SINGLE ON THREADRIPPR ONLY USE QUAD CHANNEL NOT 2*DUAL inside ram,(hardware ,IC and pcb )single,dual,quad not same ,completly diffrante ,, many people think = dual =2*single channel ram or quad =4* dual ram you must use only ram, write on box QUAD for threadripper (dual for ryzen) if you put wrong ram your system cant start , even if start , hiccops rip in windows, harm your cpu change your ram to this gskill ripjaws4 4*8 3200=250$ or gskil ripjaws4 4*4 2400=150$ از رم تک روی رایزن و زوتا دوال رو تریدریپر پرهیز کنید ، روشن نمیشه ، بشه هم لگ و سکسکه میده ، فقط رم درجه یک جی اسکیل یا ژل و لاغیر amd ryzen is very very very exclent,smooth,powerfull but need no1 true chanell ram


Excellent

3 years ago.

Extremely fast


Excellent

3 years ago.

I absolutely love this CPU - it manages to chew through rendering (hobby) & data analysis & ML (work) tasks like no tomorrow, and manages to put my R7 1800X to shame even in single threaded performance (better ram support helps a LOT - managed to get it running at 3466MTs). On top of that, its been beating my 1080tis in Blender Cycles rendering. The huge amount of PCIe bandwidth and memory bandwidth is also absolutely wonderful. Plus, it runs games just fine (Though I'm gpu bottlenecked on my current setup, since I run at 4k) All for just $999!


Good

15 months ago.

This is my first AMD since more than a decade.


Excellent

2 years ago.

Really happy with my new Threadripper build.


Good

2 years ago.

Price point now massively better and the benchmark software is now being optimised for Ryzen so scores will improve over the already max optimised intel variants.


Excellent

2 years ago.

I love how fast it is and how much it can handle. Editing is a breeze, and it alows me to get stuff done, fast.


Good

11 months ago.

High power consumption when overclocked. Great Work Station performance.


Excellent

8 months ago.

This is an awesome cpu. Whatever I through at it, the processor practically implements with super high speed. I use this component mainly for gaming in 4K. For the time being, I wouldn't trade this cpu for anything.


Your
opinion?
1264 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $193Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $300Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $43
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $66SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback