COMPARE
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
AMD100-100001277WOF
AMD100-100000651WOF
▲ 52202 ▼

16 Cores, 32 Threads @4.3GHz, Zen5.
Release date: Q3 2024.

VS
Effective Speed 
+13%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 23,325 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
77 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 134% Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 5.45 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 101% Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Poor: 101% Great: 134%
SPEED RANK: 28th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 163%
UFO
23,248 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 111% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 91% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 91% Great: 111%
SPEED RANK: 74th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		118 % Faster effective speed.
+13% 		104 %
Average Score 
+30%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		78.2 Pts 95.5 Pts Lower memory latency.
+22%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		228 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+44% 		158 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		447 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+43% 		313 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		844 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+39% 		606 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		1,608 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+48% 		1,088 Pts
Overclocked Score 
+36%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		93.1 Pts 99.5 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+7%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		243 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+46% 		166 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		486 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+47% 		331 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		950 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+45% 		656 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		1,857 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+47% 		1,267 Pts
Value & Sentiment 
+151%
Market Share
Based on 68,967,031 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.05 % 0.32 % Hugely higher market share.
+540%
Value
Value For Money 		97.9 % 99 % +1%
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		52 % 64 % More popular.
+23%
Price
Price (score) 		$550 $335 Much cheaper.
+39%
Nice To Haves 
+165%
Age
Newest 		2 Months Hugely more recent.
+94% 		31+ Months
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		4,748 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+207% 		1,547 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		4,201 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+193% 		1,432 Pts
Conclusion 
Average Bench 118%
Average Bench 104%

The Ryzen 9000 CPUs have the same integrated graphics, PCIe lanes, USB support and DRAM controller as the Ryzen 7000 series. The only difference is improved cores which have moved from TSMC's 5 nm process to 4 nm. The new cores offer 15% more performance under cherry-picked conditions but for latency-sensitive workloads, like gaming, they are just few percent faster. The 9600X, 9700X, 9900X, and 9950X are priced at $280, $360, $500, and $650, respectively, making them $80-$200 USD more expensive than the 7000 series. Since the 7000 series flopped (7800X3D somewhat excluded) due to unrealistic pricing, slow boot times, high platform costs and windows gamebar requirements etc., the 9000 series is more or less DOA. When the 9000X3D variants launch (expected in early 2025) gamers who play cache sensitive games such as SoTTR or Factorio with a 4090 and don’t mind frame drops, may find value in the 9800X3D. Meanwhile, Intel’s 12th and 13th gen CPUs continue to offer the best value for money in today’s market. Furthermore, Intel is scheduled to launch Arrow-Lake (est. +10% performance vs 14th gen) and Lunar-Lake (snapdragon competitive x86 battery life) this year, but they face serious challenges due to reliance on marketers who are mostly funded by AMD. Even if Arrow and Lunar Lake deliver stellar performance, without significant improvements in social media marketing: forums, reddit, youtube etc., Intel now face the very real risk of bankruptcy (third worst-performing S&P500 stock from Jan to Aug 2024). [Aug '24 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The 5800X3D has the same core architecture as the 5800X but it runs at 11% lower base and 4% lower boost clocks. The lower clocks are in exchange for an extra 64MB of cache (96MB up from 32MB) and around 40% more money. For most real-world tasks performance is comparable to the 5800X. Cache sensitive scenarios such as low res. canned game benchmarks with a 3090-Ti ($2,000 USD) benefit at the cost of everything else. Be wary of sponsored reviews with cherry picked games that showcase the wins, conveniently ignore frame drops and gloss over the losses. Also watch out for AMD’s army of Neanderthal social media accounts on reddit, forums and youtube, they will be singing their own praises as usual. Instead of focusing on real-world performance, AMD’s marketers aim to dupe consumers with bankrolled headlines. The same tactics were used with the Radeon 5000 series GPUs. Zen 4 needs to bring substantial IPC improvements for all workloads, rather than overpriced "3D" marketing gimmicks. New PC builders have little reason to look further than the $260 12600K which, at a fraction of the price, offers better all round performance in gaming, desktop and workstation applications. Users with an existing AM4 build should wait just a few more months for better performance at lower prices with Raptor Lake or even Zen 4. The marketers selling expensive “3D” upgrades today will quickly move onto Zen 4 (3D) leaving unfortunate buyers stuck on an overpriced, 6 year old, dead-end, platform. [Mar '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
77
23,248
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback