COMPARE
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
AMD100-100000662WOF
AMD
▲ 52135 ▼

12 Cores, 24 Threads @4.4GHz, Zen5.
Release date: Q3 2024.

VS
▲ 56476 ▼
  

8 Cores, 16 Threads.
Release date ≈ Q1 2020.

Effective Speed 
+64%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 4,441 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
58 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 129% Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 108% Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 5.45 GHz (avg)
Poor: 108% Great: 129%
SPEED RANK: 31st / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 146%
UFO
4,383 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 90% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 46% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 0.5 GHz (avg)
Poor: 46% Great: 90%
SPEED RANK: 386th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		117 % Much faster effective speed.
+64% 		71.5 %
Average Score 
+99%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		79.1 Pts Lower memory latency.
+13% 		70.2 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		230 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+117% 		106 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		451 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+118% 		207 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		830 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+111% 		393 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		1,578 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+137% 		667 Pts
Overclocked Score 
+63%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		87.9 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+7% 		82 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		242 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+69% 		143 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		479 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+70% 		282 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		948 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+75% 		543 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		1,824 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+92% 		950 Pts
Value & Sentiment 
+346%
Market Share
Based on 69,011,580 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.08 % Hugely higher market share.
+700% 		0.01 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		52 % 56 % Slightly more popular.
+8%
Nice To Haves 
+167%
Age
Newest 		3 Months Hugely more recent.
+95% 		55+ Months
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		3,602 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+170% 		1,332 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		3,215 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+236% 		958 Pts
Conclusion 
Average Bench 117%
Average Bench 71.5%

The Ryzen 9000 CPUs have the same integrated graphics, PCIe lanes, USB support and DRAM controller as the Ryzen 7000 series. The only difference is improved cores which have moved from TSMC's 5 nm process to 4 nm. The new cores offer 15% more performance under cherry-picked conditions but for latency-sensitive workloads, like gaming, they are just few percent faster. The 9600X, 9700X, 9900X, and 9950X are priced at $280, $360, $500, and $650, respectively, making them $80-$200 USD more expensive than the 7000 series. Since the 7000 series flopped (7800X3D somewhat excluded) due to unrealistic pricing, slow boot times, high platform costs and windows gamebar requirements etc., the 9000 series is more or less DOA. When the 9000X3D variants launch (expected in early 2025) gamers who play cache sensitive games such as SoTTR or Factorio with a 4090 and don’t mind frame drops, may find value in the 9800X3D. Meanwhile, Intel’s 12th and 13th gen CPUs continue to offer the best value for money in today’s market. Furthermore, Intel is scheduled to launch Arrow-Lake (est. +10% performance vs 14th gen) and Lunar-Lake (snapdragon competitive x86 battery life) this year, but they face serious challenges due to reliance on marketers who are mostly funded by AMD. Even if Arrow and Lunar Lake deliver stellar performance, without significant improvements in social media marketing: forums, reddit, youtube etc., Intel now face the very real risk of bankruptcy (third worst-performing S&P500 stock from Jan to Aug 2024). [Aug '24 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Ryzen 4000 Mobile CPUs offer benchmark busting multi-core performance on the go, but marketing hype aside, it’s unclear how this will translate to real world performance. Sixteen threads are great for beating benchmarks including UserBenchmark 64-core, Cinebench, Blender-CPU and Handbrake-CPU but gamers need performance in the games that they actually play. At launch, the top GPU available in a 4000 series laptop is the RTX 2060. Since the GPU is largely responsible for overall gaming performance, the Ryzen 4000 laptops will offer mid tier gaming performance at best. Pairing stronger GPUs would be suboptimal because the Ryzen gaming bottleneck becomes increasingly severe with more powerful GPUs. Streamers and media producers, who may have historically benefited from high core counts, are better off using the GPU (NVENC or QuickSync) for encoding. Leading media creation applications including both DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Premiere Pro are largely GPU bound. With low power consumption and high core counts, the 4000 range, on paper at least, is a perfect fit for the datacenter. AMD should focus on delivering a platform that offers performance where end users actually need it rather than targeting inexperienced gamers with the same old "moar cores" mantra. From a gamer’s perspective, the best feature of the 4000 series laptops is the absence of the equally hyped 5000 series GPUs. Prospective gaming laptop buyers will find lower latency (and therefore better gaming) CPUs combined with faster GPUs at similar price points. [Mar '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
58
4,383
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback