Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B650 EAGLE AX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics57.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B650 EAGLE AX  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20241016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 24 '24 at 15:59
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X-$383
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 74.1
1-Core 188
2-Core 377
110% 213 Pts
4-Core 751
8-Core 1,612
138% 1,182 Pts
64-Core 3,103
192% 3,103 Pts
Poor: 108%
This bench: 108%
Great: 129%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-6GB
MSI(1462 8123) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 565.90
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.5% Above average
Lighting 75.8
Reflection 74
Parallax 71.6
62% 73.8 fps
MRender 63.2
Gravity 62
Splatting 56.9
49% 60.7 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 61%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
869GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CBG04418
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,843
Write 1,788
Mixed 1,208
359% 1,613 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 69.5
4K Mixed 45.9
147% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 647
DQ Write 1,388
DQ Mixed 865
702% 967 MB/s
Poor: 150% Great: 352%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 6000 C30 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
166% Outstanding
MC Read 75
MC Write 48.2
MC Mixed 61.9
176% 61.7 GB/s
SC Read 41.5
SC Write 61.4
SC Mixed 45.8
142% 49.6 GB/s
Latency 93.1
43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 140%
This bench: 166%
Great: 202%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 560 150 60 21.5" 1920 1009 AOC2270 2270W
Typical GA-B650 EAGLE AX Builds (Compare 197 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B650 EAGLE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 158% - Outstanding Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback