COMPARE
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
AMD100-100000662WOF
AMDFD832EWMHKBOX
▲ 52128 ▼

12 Cores, 24 Threads @4.4GHz, Zen5.
Release date: Q3 2024.

VS
▲ 542,883 ▼

8 Cores, 8 Threads @3.2GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q3 2014.

Effective Speed 
+103%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 33,253 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
54 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 129% Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 5.45 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 104% Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 104% Great: 129%
SPEED RANK: 31st / 1467
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 144%
UFO
33,199 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 65% Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 47% Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 47% Great: 65%
SPEED RANK: 640th / 1467
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		117 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+103% 		57.8 %
Average Score 
+269%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		80.6 Pts 80.6 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		227 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+286% 		58.8 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		444 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+311% 		108 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		823 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+331% 		191 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		1,536 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+415% 		298 Pts
Overclocked Score 
+232%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		90.4 Pts 91.4 Pts +1%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		238 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+238% 		70.4 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		473 Pts Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
+253% 		134 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		918 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+286% 		238 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		1,792 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+384% 		370 Pts
Value & Sentiment 
+60%
Market Share
Based on 68,975,604 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.04 % Hugely higher market share.
+300% 		0.01 %
Value
Value For Money 		108 % Better value.
+25% 		86 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		52 % 54 % +4%
Price
Price (score) 		$383 $65 Hugely cheaper.
+83%
Nice To Haves 
+252%
Age
Newest 		2 Months Hugely more recent.
+98% 		122 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		120 Watts 95 Watts More energy efficient.
+21%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		12 cores Much higher core count.
+50% 		8 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		24 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+200% 		8 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		4 nm Hugely newer manufacturing.
+88% 		32 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		4.4 GHz Much faster base frequency.
+38% 		3.2 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		5.6 GHz Much faster turbo frequency.
+40% 		4 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		3,541 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+837% 		378 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		3,158 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+935% 		305 Pts
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Zen5 Piledriver
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		AM5 AM3+
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		RDNA2 None
Conclusion 
Average Bench 117%
Average Bench 57.8%

The Ryzen 9000 CPUs have the same integrated graphics, PCIe lanes, USB support and DRAM controller as the Ryzen 7000 series. The only difference is improved cores which have moved from TSMC's 5 nm process to 4 nm. The new cores offer 15% more performance under cherry-picked conditions but for latency-sensitive workloads, like gaming, they are just few percent faster. The 9600X, 9700X, 9900X, and 9950X are priced at $280, $360, $500, and $650, respectively, making them $80-$200 USD more expensive than the 7000 series. Since the 7000 series flopped (7800X3D somewhat excluded) due to unrealistic pricing, slow boot times, high platform costs and windows gamebar requirements etc., the 9000 series is more or less DOA. When the 9000X3D variants launch (expected in early 2025) gamers who play cache sensitive games such as SoTTR or Factorio with a 4090 and don’t mind frame drops, may find value in the 9800X3D. Meanwhile, Intel’s 12th and 13th gen CPUs continue to offer the best value for money in today’s market. Furthermore, Intel is scheduled to launch Arrow-Lake (est. +10% performance vs 14th gen) and Lunar-Lake (snapdragon competitive x86 battery life) this year, but they face serious challenges due to reliance on marketers who are mostly funded by AMD. Even if Arrow and Lunar Lake deliver stellar performance, without significant improvements in social media marketing: forums, reddit, youtube etc., Intel now face the very real risk of bankruptcy (third worst-performing S&P500 stock from Jan to Aug 2024). [Aug '24 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The FX-8320E is a Vishera eight core processor based on AMD’s Piledriver architecture. The ‘E’ in the FX-8320E denotes energy efficiency with the FX-8320E boasting a TDP of 95 Watts which is relatively low for FX processors. The FX-8320E was launched in September 2014 at the same time as the FX-8370E. Comparing the 8370E and 8320E shows that the performance profiles are similar with the 25% more expensive 8370E edging ahead, particularly on single core workloads. The 8370E is clocked slightly higher with base/turbo frequencies of 3.3/4.3 GHz versus the 8320E’s 3.2/4.0 GHz. Overall the 8320E scores a mediocre effective speed of 70. Whilst this is sufficient for the majority of desktop applications: web-surfing, word-processing and playing movies, better single-core performance is offered by any number of Intel processors. [Dec '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
54
33,199
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback