Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 268%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics193% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240723
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 25 '24 at 13:18
Run Duration322 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X-$413
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 5.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 90
1-Core 238
2-Core 477
138% 268 Pts
4-Core 633
8-Core 1,379
117% 1,006 Pts
64-Core 3,606
223% 3,606 Pts
Poor: 104%
This bench: 104%
Great: 129%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
ASRock(1849 5212) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.7.1
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
193% Outstanding
Lighting 241
Reflection 252
Parallax 486
196% 326 fps
MRender 406
Gravity 212
Splatting 322
256% 313 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 193%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Avant 240GB Client SSD 240GB
194GB free
Firmware: R0427A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 458 461 468 468 468 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 466
Mixed 453
SusWrite 455
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 83.2
4K Mixed 48.8
159% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 392
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 281
237% 344 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 115%
Great: 125%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
840GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 233010WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1331 363 371 375 370 378 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,524
Write 1,822
Mixed 1,408
SusWrite 531
297% 1,321 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 83.1
4K Mixed 51
165% 57 MB/s
DQ Read 1,316
DQ Write 1,475
DQ Mixed 1,381
1,044% 1,391 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 207%
Great: 276%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB
788GB free
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3079 3069 3054 3057 3051 3042 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
475% Outstanding
Read 3,388
Write 3,093
Mixed 2,650
SusWrite 3,058
686% 3,047 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 69.5
4K Mixed 46.9
162% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 2,498
DQ Write 2,172
DQ Mixed 2,158
1,666% 2,276 MB/s
Poor: 260%
This bench: 475%
Great: 622%
WDBRPG5000ANC-WRSN 500GB
251GB free
Firmware: 102000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1182 836 837 843 842 840 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 2,027
Write 1,176
Mixed 1,660
SusWrite 897
322% 1,440 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 68.7
4K Mixed 46.6
151% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,657
DQ Write 1,612
DQ Mixed 1,426
1,128% 1,565 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 255%
Great: 296%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$64
519GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 125 121 123 121 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 135
Write 136
Mixed 91.6
SusWrite 121
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 96%
120gb SATA Flash Drive 120GB
32GB free
Firmware: SFPA001N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 150 84 76 77 75 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TZ/RJ/FL DDR5 6000 C32 2x16GB-$83
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
234% Outstanding
MC Read 117
MC Write 67.5
MC Mixed 80.1
252% 88.2 GB/s
SC Read 55.9
SC Write 75.5
SC Mixed 63.8
186% 65.1 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 139%
This bench: 234%
Great: 202%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 34.1" 1280 720 BNQ7F9A BenQ EX3415R
Typical GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 461 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 291%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 295%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $1,742
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $220Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback