COMPARE
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
AMD100-100000051WOF
AMDYD1700BBAEBOX
▲ 601,618 ▼

16 Cores, 32 Threads @3.5GHz, Zen2.
Release date: Q4 2019.

VS
▲ 6913,314 ▼

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.0GHz, Zen.
Release date: Q1 2017.

Effective Speed 
+29%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 194,645 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
50,170 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 97% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 79% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 0.5 GHz (avg)
Poor: 79% Great: 97%
SPEED RANK: 139th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO
144,475 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 81% Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 59% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 59% Great: 81%
SPEED RANK: 422nd / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		89.3 % Faster effective speed.
+29% 		69 %
External Data: 1080p 
+20%
14 Nov19|PCGamer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review 		20 % Hitm2 30%, FarC5 23%, StrangeB 6%, TWarW2 26%, SotTR 32%, ACO 17%, MetroEx 17%, MESoW 17%, Divis2 15%
Average Score 
+43%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		77.2 Pts Lower memory latency.
+10% 		70 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		139 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+44% 		96.7 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		276 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+45% 		190 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		543 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+48% 		366 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		1074 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+68% 		640 Pts
Overclocked Score 
+28%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		88.2 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+12% 		78.8 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		150 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+29% 		116 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		297 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+27% 		233 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		580 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+27% 		456 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		1146 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+44% 		798 Pts
Value & Sentiment 
+34%
Market Share
Based on 67,807,933 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.05 % 0.08 % Much higher market share.
+60%
Value
Value For Money 		76.2 % +0% 76.1 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		60 % 69 % More popular.
+15%
Price
Price (score) 		$495 $195 Much cheaper.
+61%
Nice To Haves 
+69%
Age
Newest 		53 Months Much more recent.
+38% 		86 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		105 Watts 65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+38%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		16 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100% 		8 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		32 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100% 		16 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		7 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+50% 		14 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		3.5 GHz Faster base frequency.
+17% 		3 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		4.7 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+27% 		3.7 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		2965 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+152% 		1178 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		2737 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+179% 		980 Pts
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Zen2 Zen
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		AM4 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		None None
Conclusion 
Average Bench 89.3%
Average Bench 69%
ADVERTISEMENT

The 3950X is the 16 core, 32 thread Ryzen 3 flagship. Although this CPU offers server levels of multi-core encoding performance, there are relatively few, if any, consumer use cases for the 3950X. Streamers are better off using dedicated hardware such as NVENC which encodes far more efficiently than any CPU. Gamers are better served by low latency gaming CPUs such as the 9600K for a fraction of the price. For example, comparing these two PCs shows that the 3950X build offers less than half the gaming performance. The only rational reason to put a 3950X in a gaming build is in exchange for sponsorship money. [Feb '21 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700 is the least powerful of three new Ryzen 7 CPUs. The 1700 model has base and turbo clocks of 3.0 and 3.7 GHz respectively. Both of its more expensive siblings, the 1700X and 1800X, have higher clocks but they also have TDPs of 95 watts whereas the 1700 is rated at just 65 watts. Comparing IPC between Ryzen and Kaby Lake shows that Kaby Lake leads by a maximum of 9% which is great news for workstation users as this allows the 1700 to beat Intel's 6850K in multi-core workloads at almost half the price. Although the 1700 has great IPC it's somewhat limited by its relatively low (by Kaby Lake standards) clock speed which holds it back a little in both gaming and desktop workloads. For multi-core workstation use, the Ryzen 7 1700 represents the best value for money we have ever seen. [Mar '17 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
50,170
144,475
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback