AMD100-100000023BOX
AMD100-100000022BOX

12 Cores, 24 Threads @3.8GHz, Zen2.
Release date: Q3 2019.

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.8GHz, Zen2.
Release date: Q3 2019.

CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
233 EFps 233 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
105 EFps +4% 101 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
130 EFps 131 EFps +1%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
124 EFps +4% 119 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
141 EFps Slightly Better Fortnite EFps.
+8%
131 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 492,301 user samples
197,342 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 97% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 80% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 0.6 GHz (avg)
Poor: 80% Great: 97%
SPEED RANK: 154th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
294,959 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 92% Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 74% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 0.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 74% Great: 92%
SPEED RANK: 192nd / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
87.9 % +5% 84.1 %
14 Nov19|PCGamer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review
2 % Hitm2 3%, FarC5 3%, StrangeB 6%, TWarW2 2%, SotTR 2%, ACO 1%, MESoW 0%, Divis2 2% MetroEx 0%
20 Oct22|HardwareLUXX
The Dino Intel is not yet extinct:...
5 % SpiderM 2%, RiftB 12%, TWarTroy 13%, F122 8%, DoomE 6% Control 6%, CPunk 2%
10 Mar21|HardwareLUXX
Processor non grata: Rocket Lake-S...
3 % BFV 3%, SotTR 5%, Divis2 5% MetroEx 2%
20 Oct22|Techpowerup
Intel Core i5-13600K Review - Best...
4 % Forza5 3%, FarC6 2%, WatchDL 2%, BFV 3%, CPunk 1%, Civ6 37%, CSGO 3%, DoomE 5% AoE4 2%, Bord3 1%, EldenR 6%, RDR2 0%
05 Nov20|Techpowerup
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Review
2 % FarC5 5%, BFV 5%, Rage2 2%, Witcher3 1%, Civ6 14%, Sekiro 3%, Wolf2 0% SotTR 1%, ACO 2%, MetroEx 2%
05 Nov20|Techpowerup
AMD Ryzen 5 5800X Review
2 % FarC5 5%, BFV 5%, Rage2 2%, Witcher3 1%, Civ6 14%, Sekiro 3%, Wolf2 0% SotTR 1%, ACO 2%, MetroEx 2%
30 Oct19|Gamers Nexus
Intel i9-9900KS Review: Overclocki...
4 % OC F118 4% OC, GTAV 5% OC, SotTR 4% OC
30 Oct19|Gamers Nexus
Intel i9-9900KS Review: Overclocki...
3 % Hitm2 3%, F118 2%, GTAV 3%, SotTR 2%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
75 Pts 76.9 Pts +3%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
139 Pts +2% 136 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
275 Pts +4% 264 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
539 Pts Slightly faster quad-core speed.
+10%
490 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
1030 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+27%
808 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
87.9 Pts +1% 87.1 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
148 Pts +1% 146 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
295 Pts +3% 287 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
577 Pts +4% 553 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1128 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+28%
878 Pts
Market Share
Based on 67,755,799 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.18 % 0.22 % Higher market share.
+22%
Value
Value For Money
79.8 % 90.8 % Better value.
+14%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
73 % Slightly more popular.
+6%
69 %
Price
Price (score)
$395 $210 Much cheaper.
+47%
Age
Newest
57 Months 57 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
105 Watts 95 Watts Slightly more energy efficient.
+10%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
12 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100%
6 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
24 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100%
12 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
7 nm 7 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.8 GHz 3.8 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.6 GHz +5% 4.4 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
2224 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+101%
1106 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
2036 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+100%
1017 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen2 Zen2
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

Early Q3 of 2019 welcomes the Ryzen 9 3900X, AMD’s current top of the range, third generation Ryzen flagship which raises the bar for 64-core processing on desktop CPUs. This is AMD’s first Ryzen 9 processor and it is a 12-core, 24-thread CPU based on their latest 7nm Zen 2 microarchitecture. The 3900X has a boost/base clock of 3.8/4.6 GHz, 64 MB of L3 cache (double the L3 on the rest of 3000 series), support for 3200 MHz DDR4 system memory and a TDP of 105W. All this, plus a Wraith Prism cooler, at a very reasonable launch price of $499 USD. By comparison, Intel’s 8-core, 16 thread i9-9900K is available for $479 USD (and requires a cooler: $30+ USD). Benchmarks illustrate that the overclocked 3900X leads by a whopping 41% for 64-core processing but that the 9900K maintains a 10% lead for gaming, desktop and other sub octa-core tasks. The 3900 memory controller is significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations and shows a better write throughput than the lower spec 3000 models, but it still shows relatively high latency which adversely impacts gaming. In terms of 64-core performance at this price point, there is no threat from Intel. The only real competitor is the upcoming (Q4, 2019) 16-core, 32-thread 3950X ($749 USD). The Ryzen 9 3900X is compatible with the new PCIe 4.0 enabled X570 motherboard via an AM4 socket, as well as 400 and 300 series motherboards. [Jul '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Early Q3 of 2019 sees the release of the new Ryzen 5 3600X: a hex-core, 12-thread processor. AMD are releasing five new CPUs based on their latest Zen 2 microarchitecture which delivers approximately 13% better IPC than the previous 12nm Zen+. For workstation builds the 3600X is viable, however, the $200 USD Ryzen 5 3600 represents a far better value proposition. The additional $40 USD for the 3600X basically buys a better cooler (Spire vs Stealth). This allows for an extra 200 MHz of extra base and boost clock: 3.8 / 4.4 GHz on the 3600X vs 3.6 / 4.2 GHz on the 3600, this translates to approximately 2% higher overclocked performance for 20% more money. Neither of the stock coolers on the 3600 or 3600X are as effective as a $20 USD aftermarket cooler such as the Gammaxx 400. The 3600 with a Gammaxx 400 outperforms the 3600X with a Spire cooler and when both use a Gammaxx 400 they are more or less identical. The 3600X SKU is basically a marketing gimmick designed to milk unsuspecting consumers. Comparing the 3600X to Intel’s overclocked flagship i5-9600K shows that although the 3600X has 29% faster 64-core speed, it is around 11% worse for gaming (sub eight core performance). Additionally, the 3600X's memory controller, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency which can also impact gaming. The arrival of Zen 2 marks the end of the "Sandy Bridge (i5-2500K)" era, Intel can no longer rely exclusively on their single-core advantage to dominate the market, they must also compete on price. [Jul '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback