COMPARE
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
AMD100-100000910WOF
AMD100-000000098
▲ 965,443 ▼

8 Cores, 16 Threads.
Release date ≈ Q2 2023.

VS
▲ 592,440 ▼
  

8 Cores, 16 Threads.
Release date ≈ Q1 2020.

Effective Speed 
+58%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 31,380 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
4,873 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 122% Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 102% Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Poor: 102% Great: 122%
SPEED RANK: 26th / 1456
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO
26,507 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 92% Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 51% Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 51% Great: 92%
SPEED RANK: 328th / 1456
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		117 % Much faster effective speed.
+58% 		74.1 %
Average Score 
+71%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		95.3 Pts Much lower memory latency.
+33% 		71.4 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		192 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+70% 		113 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		382 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+77% 		216 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		745 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+80% 		414 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		1362 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+95% 		697 Pts
Overclocked Score 
+37%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		99.2 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+21% 		81.8 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		200 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+39% 		144 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		398 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+39% 		287 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		788 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+39% 		566 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		1572 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+48% 		1061 Pts
Value & Sentiment 
+75%
Market Share
Based on 68,098,631 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.28 % Hugely higher market share.
+87% 		0.15 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		96 % Much more popular.
+63% 		59 %
Nice To Haves 
+62%
Age
Newest 		14+ Months Much more recent.
+73% 		52+ Months
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		1886 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+28% 		1470 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		1784 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+84% 		972 Pts
Conclusion 
Average Bench 117%
Average Bench 74.1%
ADVERTISEMENT

The AMD 7000X3D CPUs have the same core architecture as the rest of the 7000 series but they have one group of eight "3D" cores with extra cache. The “3D” cores are priced higher but run at 10% lower clocks. For most real-world tasks performance is comparable to the 7000X variant. Cache sensitive scenarios such as low res. canned game benchmarks with an RTX 4090 ($2,000) benefit at the cost of everything else. Be wary of sponsored reviews with cherry picked games that showcase the wins, ignore frame drops and gloss over the losses. Also watch out for AMD’s army of Neanderthal social media accounts on reddit, forums and youtube, they will be singing their own praises as usual. AMD continue to develop “Advanced Marketing” relationships with select youtubers with the obvious aim of compensating for second tier products with first tier marketing. PC gamers considering a 7000X3D CPU need to work on their critical thinking skills: Influencers are paid handsomely to promote overpriced niche products (X3D, EPYC, Threadripper etc.). Rational gamers have little reason to look further than the $300 13600K which offers comparable real-world gaming and better desktop performance at a fraction of the price. Workstation users (and RTX 4080+ gamers) may find value in higher core CPUs such as the 16-core $400 13700K. Despite offering better performance at lower prices, as long as Intel continues to sample and sponsor marketers that are mostly funded by AMD, they will struggle to win market share. [Apr '23 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Ryzen 4000 Mobile CPUs offer benchmark busting multi-core performance on the go, but marketing hype aside, it’s unclear how this will translate to real world performance. Sixteen threads are great for beating benchmarks including UserBenchmark 64-core, Cinebench, Blender-CPU and Handbrake-CPU but gamers need performance in the games that they actually play. At launch, the top GPU available in a 4000 series laptop is the RTX 2060. Since the GPU is largely responsible for overall gaming performance, the Ryzen 4000 laptops will offer mid tier gaming performance at best. Pairing stronger GPUs would be suboptimal because the Zen gaming bottleneck becomes increasingly severe with more powerful GPUs. Streamers and media producers, who may have historically benefited from high core counts, are better off using the GPU (NVENC or QuickSync) for encoding. Leading media creation applications including both DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Premiere Pro are largely GPU bound. With low power consumption and high core counts, the 4000 range, on paper at least, is a perfect fit for the datacenter. AMD should focus on delivering a platform that offers performance where end users actually need it rather than targeting inexperienced gamers with the same old "moar cores" mantra. From a gamer’s perspective, the best feature of the 4000 series laptops is the absence of the equally hyped 5000 series GPUs. Prospective gaming laptop buyers will find lower latency (and therefore better gaming) CPUs combined with faster GPUs at similar price points. [Mar '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
4,873
26,507
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback