COMPARE
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
AMD100-100000910WOF
AMDYD150XBBAEBOX
▲ 959,199 ▼

8 Cores, 16 Threads.
Release date ≈ Q2 2023.

VS
▲ 614,396 ▼

4 Cores, 8 Threads @3.5GHz, Zen.
Release date: Q2 2017.

Effective Speed 
+76%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 76,983 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
6,945 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 122% Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 105% Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Poor: 105% Great: 122%
SPEED RANK: 32nd / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
70,038 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 73% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 56% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Poor: 56% Great: 73%
SPEED RANK: 490th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		117 % Much faster effective speed.
+76% 		66.4 %
Average Score 
+102%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		95.6 Pts Much lower memory latency.
+33% 		71.8 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		194 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+88% 		103 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		383 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+99% 		192 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		740 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+125% 		329 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		1329 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+164% 		503 Pts
Overclocked Score 
+90%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		99.2 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+25% 		79.5 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		199 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+75% 		114 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		397 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+79% 		222 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		784 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+106% 		381 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		1521 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+165% 		574 Pts
Value & Sentiment 
+975%
Market Share
Based on 68,909,081 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.8 % Insanely higher market share.
+3,900% 		0.02 %
Value
Value For Money 		103 % Better value.
+21% 		85.4 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		95 % Much more popular.
+56% 		61 %
Price
Price (score) 		$439 $111 Much cheaper.
+75%
Nice To Haves 
+180%
Age
Newest 		18+ Months Much more recent.
+80% 		90 Months
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		1865 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+219% 		584 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		1781 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+242% 		521 Pts
Conclusion 
Average Bench 117%
Average Bench 66.4%

The AMD 7000X3D CPUs have the same core architecture as the rest of the 7000 series but they have one group of eight "3D" cores with extra cache. The “3D” cores are priced higher but run at 10% lower clocks. For most real-world tasks performance is comparable to the 7000X variant. Cache sensitive scenarios such as low res. canned game benchmarks with an RTX 4090 ($2,000) benefit at the cost of everything else. Be wary of sponsored reviews with cherry picked games that showcase the wins, ignore frame drops and gloss over the losses. Also watch out for AMD’s army of Neanderthal social media accounts on reddit, forums and youtube, they will be singing their own praises as usual. AMD continue to develop “Advanced Marketing” relationships with select youtubers with the obvious aim of compensating for second tier products with first tier marketing. PC gamers considering a 7000X3D CPU need to work on their critical thinking skills: Influencers are paid handsomely to promote overpriced niche products (X3D, EPYC, Threadripper etc.). Rational gamers have little reason to look further than the $300 13600K which offers comparable real-world gaming and better desktop performance at a fraction of the price. Workstation users (and RTX 4080+ gamers) may find value in higher core CPUs such as the 16-core $400 13700K. Despite offering better performance at lower prices, as long as Intel continues to sample and sponsor marketers that are mostly funded by AMD, they will struggle to win market share. [Apr '23 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The quad core and octa threaded Ryzen 1500X is a sub-$200 chip based on AMD's latest Zen architecture. It is released this month as part of the Ryzen 5 launch – a mid-market range specced out to challenge Intel's i5 series and yield considerably better multi-threaded performance at budget prices. Comparing the i5-7600K shows that the 7600K is 20% faster for single and quad core workloads but looses by 20% for multi-core workloads. The Ryzen 5 line-up also includes the 6 core 12 threaded 1600X. By comparison, the 1500X is 24% less expensive, comes with a Wraith Spire cooler and impressively yields very similar single and quad core performance, but multi-core performance lags 50% behind the 1600X. Both chips can be overclocked, but out the box, the base and boost clock speeds are 3.5GHz and 3.7GHz for the 1500X and 3.6GHz and 4.0GHz for the 1600X. The 1500X is a very reasonable CPU for the money, which thanks to AMD's recent IPC improvements, punches far above its weight for multi-threaded performance by Intel's standards. [Apr '17 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
6,945
70,038
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback