Performance Results

Gaming 16%
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics24.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B38
MotherboardMSI A320M PRO-VD PLUS (MS-7B38)  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190122
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateOct 04 '22 at 18:01
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X-$121
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 64.6
1-Core 98.7
2-Core 175
64% 113 Pts
4-Core 253
8-Core 488
44% 371 Pts
64-Core 490
30% 490 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.1% Poor
Lighting 34.4
Reflection 38.9
Parallax 34
28% 35.8 fps
MRender 33.2
Gravity 35.1
Splatting 0.2
16% 22.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LE200 SSD 120GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMB1.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 43 16 68 20 127 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.8% Poor
Read 171
Write 87.9
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 65.9
22% 102 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 17.6
4K Mixed 9.5
40% 13.2 MB/s
DQ Read 15.2
DQ Write 16.1
DQ Mixed 14.6
11% 15.3 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 82%
Kingston SHFR200240G 240GB
67GB free
Firmware: 000056R8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 136 76 126 100 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 454
Write 396
Mixed 354
SusWrite 131
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 33.1
115% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 164
150% 232 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$19
582GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 149 154 153 148 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 159
Mixed 88.3
SusWrite 151
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
211% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$19
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 185 183 186 180 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 180
Mixed 97.6
SusWrite 183
121% 165 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 110%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 1x8GB-$25
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.9% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 11
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 10
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M PRO-VD PLUS (MS-7B38) Builds (Compare 320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 24%
Desktop 71%
Workstation 21%

Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-VD PLUS (MS-7B38)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $77
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback