UserBenchmark: AMD Ryzen 7 2700X vs Intel Core i9-10900K

CPU
RANKINGS

TEST
YOUR CPU

ADD TO PC
BUILD

AMDYD270XBGAFBOX

BUY • $210

IntelBX8070110900K

BUY • $440

BenchYourCPU

Watch Gameplay


CSGO Dust 2 1080p Max	200 EFps	313 EFps	Much Better CSGO EFps. +56%
GTAV Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max	97 EFps	109 EFps	Better GTAV EFps. +12%
Overwatch Temple of Anubis 1080p Max	129 EFps	138 EFps	Slightly Better Overwatch EFps. +7%
PUBG M249 Training 1080p Max	115 EFps	142 EFps	Better PUBG EFps. +23%
Fortnite UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max	108 EFps	135 EFps	Better Fortnite EFps. +25%

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 266,346 user samples

Benchmark your CPU here

159,077 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 89% Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 61% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 0.6 GHz (avg)

Poor: 61% Great: 89%

SPEED RANK: 298^th / 1442

Gaming 76%

Battleship

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

107,269 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 106% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 89% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)

Poor: 89% Great: 106%

SPEED RANK: 74^th / 1442

Gaming 100%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 100%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 107%

UFO


Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed		75.7 %			99.6 %	Much faster effective speed. +32%


10 Mar21\|HardwareLUXX Processor non grata: Rocket Lake-S...		32 %	BFV 32%, SotTR 26%, MetroEx 44%, Divis2 26%
05 Nov20\|Techpowerup AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Review		18 %	FarC5 52%, BFV 21%, SotTR 4%, Rage2 4%, Witcher3 7%, Civ6 20%, ACO 5%, MetroEx 15%, Sekiro 43%, Wolf2 11%
05 Nov20\|Techpowerup AMD Ryzen 5 5800X Review		18 %	FarC5 52%, BFV 21%, SotTR 4%, Rage2 4%, Witcher3 7%, Civ6 20%, ACO 5%, MetroEx 15%, Sekiro 43%, Wolf2 11%
06 Nov20\|Gamers Nexus Friendly Fire: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X C...		39 %	SotTR 50%, GTAV 39%, RDR2 27%, TWarTKC 28%, F120 62%, TWarTKB 25%, ACO 44%
05 Nov20\|Anandtech AMD Zen 3 Ryzen Deep Dive Review: ...	Civ6 4%	28 %	FarC5 52%, StrangeB 3%, Bord3 22%, GTAV 27%, FinFant15 35%, Chernob 18%, DExMD 34%, FinFant14 22%, F119 47%, RDR2 3%, GearsT 56%, WoT 45%
26 Dec20\|Tom's Hardware AMD Ryzen 7 5800X Review: The Pric...		40 %	Hitm2 31%, FarC5 51%, Bord3 21%, ProjC3 59%, SotTR 52%, RDR2 29%, Divis2 34%


Memory Avg. Memory Latency	75.3 Pts	91.1 Pts	Lower memory latency. +21%
1-Core Avg. Single Core Speed	113 Pts	149 Pts	Much faster single-core speed. +32%
2-Core Avg. Dual Core Speed	219 Pts	295 Pts	Much faster dual-core speed. +35%
4-Core Avg. Quad Core Speed	409 Pts	579 Pts	Much faster quad-core speed. +42%
8-Core Avg. Octa Core Speed	708 Pts	1100 Pts	Much faster octa-core speed. +55%


Memory OC Memory Latency	86.7 Pts	97.4 Pts	Lower OC memory latency. +12%
1-Core OC Single Core Speed	128 Pts	158 Pts	Faster OC single-core speed. +23%
2-Core OC Dual Core Speed	254 Pts	314 Pts	Faster OC dual-core speed. +24%
4-Core OC Quad Core Speed	499 Pts	623 Pts	Faster OC quad-core speed. +25%
8-Core OC Octa Core Speed	911 Pts	1222 Pts	Much faster OC octa-core speed. +34%

Market Share

Based on 67,823,654 CPUs tested

See market share leaders


Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days)	0.29 %		0.47 %	Much higher market share. +62%
Value Value For Money	81.7 %		87.8 %	Slightly better value. +7%
User Rating UBM User Rating	70 %	Slightly more popular. +6%	66 %
Price Price (score)	$210	Much cheaper. +52%	$440


Age Newest	72 Months		48 Months	Much more recent. +33%
TDP Thermal Design Power (TDP)	105 Watts	More energy efficient. +16%	125 Watts
Cores CPU Processing Cores	8 cores		10 cores	Higher core count. +25%
Threads CPU Processing Threads	16 threads		20 threads	Higher thread count. +25%
Lithography Manufacturing process	12 nm	Newer manufacturing. +14%	14 nm
Base Clock Base Clock Speed	3.7 GHz		3.7 GHz
Turbo Clock Turbo Clock Speed	4.3 GHz		5.3 GHz	Faster turbo frequency. +23%
64-Core OC Multi Core Speed	1276 Pts		2033 Pts	Much faster OC 64-core speed. +59%
64-Core Avg. Multi Core Speed	1096 Pts		1888 Pts	Much faster 64-core speed. +72%


Series CPU Architecture	Zen+	Comet Lake
Socket Motherboard Socket	AM4	FCLGA1200
Graphics Integrated Graphics	None	UHD 630

The 8 core, 16 thread 2700X is AMD’s second generation Ryzen 7 flagship following in the wake of the Ryzen 7 1800X which continues to offer excellent multi-core value for money. This new Pinnacle Ridge processor features the Zen+ architecture with 12nm lithography compared to 14nm previously. Whilst there is no increase in the number of cores, the stock base / boost clocks appear to have received a bump up to 3.7 / 4.3 GHz from 3.6 / 4.0 GHz. The 2700X is compatible with both the new 400 series and 300 series of motherboards. Early benchmarks indicate that the 2700X has a slightly greater effective speed than the 1800X, although further benchmarks are necessary to quantify this. The expected launch price of $329 includes a Wraith Prism cooler and is in the same price bracket as the 1800X and Intel’s Coffee Lake i7-8700K. Whilst the 6 core, 12 thread 8700K beats the 2700X in single and quad core performance by around 15%, the 2700X wins on multi-core workloads. PC gaming and desktop performance is generally governed by six or less cores but the 2700X offers value for money to workstation users. Even though the 2700X excels at video production, streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. ^{[Apr '18 CPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

Intel’s Comet Lake flagship, the i9-10900K, is the fastest gaming and desktop CPU currently available. This ten-core hyperthreaded processor can easily be overclocked so that all twenty threads run at an eye-watering 5.2 GHz. Whilst its stellar performance is second to none, it comes with a premium price tag of $488 USD. The 10900K also requires a new (Z490) LGA1200 motherboard, which Intel has indicated will remain compatible with Rocket Lake CPUs which are due later this year. Whilst AMD’s competing $420 USD Ryzen 3900X and $675 USD Ryzen 3950X do have a greater number of cores, their lower clock speeds and higher memory latency handicap them in non-rendering use cases. Overall, the 10900K has a 16% effective speed advantage over both the 3900X and 3950X. Users that do a lot of rendering should investigate dedicated hardware encoders such as NVENC and Quick Sync as these are far more efficient than CPU based rendering. Comparing the 10900K and 10700K shows that, when paired with a 2060S, the 10700K offers comparable gaming performance for 20% less money. ^{[Jun '20 CPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

Systems with these CPUs

Top Builds that include these CPUs

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. ^[CPUPro]

Group Test Results

Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

How it works

- Download and run UserBenchmark
- CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
- GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
- Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
- RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
- SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
- Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
- Identify the strongest components in your PC
- See speed test results from other users
- Compare your components to the current market leaders
- Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
- Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ

AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021

How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?

What is multi core mixed speed?

What is multi core integer speed?

What is multi core floating point speed?

What is single core mixed CPU speed?

What is quad core mixed CPU speed?

What is quad core floating point speed?

What is quad core integer speed?

What is single core floating point speed?

What is single core integer speed?

What is the GeekBench single core score?

What is a CPU?

What is the effective CPU speed index?

What is overclocking?

What is thermal design power (TDP)?

ALL FAQs »

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MORE DETAILS

MORE DETAILS

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

Group Test Results

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Feedback