AMDYD270XBGAFBOX
IntelBX8070110600K
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
200 EFps 284 EFps Much Better CSGO EFps.
+42%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
97 EFps 106 EFps Slightly Better GTAV EFps.
+9%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
129 EFps 139 EFps Slightly Better Overwatch EFps.
+8%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
115 EFps 139 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+21%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
108 EFps 139 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+29%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 514,970 user samples
479,643 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 88% Base clock 3.7 GHz
Worst Bench: 71% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 0.5 GHz (avg)
Poor: 71% Great: 88%
SPEED RANK: 141st / 1316
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
35,327 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 103% Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 86% Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Poor: 86% Great: 103%
SPEED RANK: 35th / 1316
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
81 % 95.4 % Faster effective speed.
+18%
05 Nov20|Techpowerup
AMD Ryzen 5 5800X Review
15 % FarC5 36%, BFV 22%, SotTR 5%, Rage2 2%, Witcher3 7%, Civ6 15%, ACO 3%, MetroEx 14%, Sekiro 36%, Wolf2 10%
28 May20|Techpowerup
Intel Core i5-10400F Review - Six ...
15 % FarC5 36%, BFV 22%, SotTR 5%, Rage2 2%, Witcher3 7%, Civ6 15%, ACO 3%, MetroEx 14%, Sekiro 36%, Wolf2 10%
06 Nov20|Gamers Nexus
Friendly Fire: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X C...
23 % SotTR 30%, GTAV 21%, RDR2 20%, TWarTKC 18%, F120 34%, TWarTKB 18%, ACO 21%
05 Nov20|Anandtech
AMD Zen 3 Ryzen Deep Dive Review: ...
Civ6 23%, RDR2 1% 16 % FarC5 31%, StrangeB 2%, Bord3 16%, GTAV 17%, FinFant15 20%, Chernob 11%, DExMD 34%, FinFant14 14%, F119 31%, GearsT 35%, WoT 26%
10 Mar21|HardwareLUXX
Processor non grata: Rocket Lake-S...
21 % BFV 24%, SotTR 19%, MetroEx 23%, Divis2 19%
26 Dec20|Tom's Hardware
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X Review: The Pric...
22 % Hitm2 20%, FarC5 26%, Bord3 16%, ProjC3 30%, SotTR 28%, RDR2 16%, Divis2 16%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
79 Pts 92.1 Pts Lower memory latency.
+17%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
116 Pts 141 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+22%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed
228 Pts 276 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+21%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
445 Pts 530 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+19%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed
805 Pts 871 Pts Slightly faster octa-core speed.
+8%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
88.2 Pts 96.8 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+10%
1-Core
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
124 Pts 152 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+23%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Mixed Speed
245 Pts 303 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+24%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
485 Pts 594 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+22%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Mixed Speed
934 Pts 967 Pts +4%
Market Share
Based on 44,091,257 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.14 % Hugely higher market share.
+178%
0.41 %
Value
Value For Money
82.2 % 108 % Much better value.
+31%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
71 % 93 % Much more popular.
+31%
Price
Price (score)
$263 $179 Much cheaper.
+32%
Age
Newest
38 Months 13 Months Much more recent.
+66%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
105 Watts More energy efficient.
+16%
125 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores Much higher core count.
+33%
6 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
16 threads Much higher thread count.
+33%
12 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
12 nm Newer manufacturing.
+14%
14 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.7 GHz 4.1 GHz Faster base frequency.
+11%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.3 GHz 4.8 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+12%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
1350 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+11%
1221 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
1239 Pts Faster 64-core speed.
+12%
1109 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen+ Comet Lake
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 FCLGA1200
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None UHD 630
ADVERTISEMENT

The 8 core, 16 thread 2700X is AMD’s second generation Ryzen 7 flagship following in the wake of the Ryzen 7 1800X which continues to offer excellent multi-core value for money. This new Pinnacle Ridge processor features the Zen+ architecture with 12nm lithography compared to 14nm previously. Whilst there is no increase in the number of cores, the stock base / boost clocks appear to have received a bump up to 3.7 / 4.3 GHz from 3.6 / 4.0 GHz. The 2700X is compatible with both the new 400 series and 300 series of motherboards. Early benchmarks indicate that the 2700X has a slightly greater effective speed than the 1800X, although further benchmarks are necessary to quantify this. The expected launch price of $329 includes a Wraith Prism cooler and is in the same price bracket as the 1800X and Intel’s Coffee Lake i7-8700K. Whilst the 6 core, 12 thread 8700K beats the 2700X in single and quad core performance by around 15%, the 2700X wins on multi-core workloads. PC gaming and desktop performance is generally governed by six or less cores but the 2700X offers value for money to workstation users. Even though the 2700X excels at video production, streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Intel’s tenth gen, six-core i5-10600K is one of the fastest consumer CPUs currently available. Out of the box, its maximum all core frequency is 4.5 GHz, but a simple overclock allows all 12 threads to hit 5.0 GHz. Although a new Z490 (LGA1200) motherboard is required, Intel have indicated that LGA1200 will remain compatible with Rocket Lake CPUs which are due later this year. The eight-core Ryzen 3700X currently competes in the 10600K’s price bracket. CPU based encoding is akin to using hair clippers on a lawn but If dedicated hardware such as NVENC or QuickSync is not an option, the 3700X can outperform the 10600K in encoding workloads such as UserBenchmark 64-core, Cinebench, Blender-CPU and Handbrake-CPU. Meanwhile, the 10600K is better for almost everything else. Currently, the real problem with the 10600K, and much of the Comet Lake line up, is availability. Whilst there was a paper launch in Q2 2020, at the time of writing, the 10600K is still largely unavailable for purchase. In order to achieve better value for money, without compromising on gaming performance, it is necessary to consider the older generation 9600K which is 26% cheaper and offers similar gaming performance. [Jun '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2021 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $48
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback