COMPARE
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
AMDYD270XBGAFBOX
AMDYD195XA8AEWOF
▲ 698,479 ▼

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.7GHz, Zen+.
Release date: Q2 2018.

VS
▲ 631,835 ▼

16 Cores, 32 Threads @3.4GHz, Zen.
Release date: Q3 2017.

Effective Speed 
+1%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 182,718 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
159,077 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 89% Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 61% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 0.6 GHz (avg)
Poor: 61% Great: 89%
SPEED RANK: 319th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
23,641 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 85% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 68% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 68% Great: 85%
SPEED RANK: 304th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		75.7 % 76.7 % +1%
External Data: 1080p 
+9%
14 Nov19|PCGamer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review 		9 % FarC5 21%, StrangeB 6%, TWarW2 18%, SotTR 2%, MetroEx 19%, MESoW 11%, Divis2 7% Hitm2 1%, ACO 1%
Average Score 
+6%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		75.3 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+9% 		69.3 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		113 Pts 115 Pts +2%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		219 Pts 228 Pts +4%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		409 Pts 450 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+10%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		708 Pts 876 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+24%
Overclocked Score 
+1%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		86.7 Pts +4% 83.4 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		128 Pts +2% 125 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		254 Pts +3% 247 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		499 Pts +1% 493 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		911 Pts 981 Pts Slightly faster OC octa-core speed.
+8%
Value & Sentiment 
+822%
Market Share
Based on 68,935,770 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.33 % Insanely higher market share.
+3,200% 		0.01 %
Value
Value For Money 		89.7 % Better value.
+23% 		72.9 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		69 % Slightly more popular.
+10% 		63 %
Price
Price (score) 		$150 Much cheaper.
+55% 		$334
Nice To Haves 
+35%
Age
Newest 		78 Months Slightly more recent.
+9% 		86 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		105 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+42% 		180 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		8 cores 16 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		16 threads 32 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100%
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		12 nm Newer manufacturing.
+14% 		14 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		3.7 GHz Slightly faster base frequency.
+9% 		3.4 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		4.3 GHz Slightly faster turbo frequency.
+8% 		4 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		1276 Pts 2521 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+98%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		1096 Pts 2190 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+100%
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Zen+ Zen
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		AM4 TR4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		None None
Conclusion 
Average Bench 75.7%
Average Bench 76.7%

The 8 core, 16 thread 2700X is AMD’s second generation Ryzen 7 flagship following in the wake of the Ryzen 7 1800X which continues to offer excellent multi-core value for money. This new Pinnacle Ridge processor features the Zen+ architecture with 12nm lithography compared to 14nm previously. Whilst there is no increase in the number of cores, the stock base / boost clocks appear to have received a bump up to 3.7 / 4.3 GHz from 3.6 / 4.0 GHz. The 2700X is compatible with both the new 400 series and 300 series of motherboards. Early benchmarks indicate that the 2700X has a slightly greater effective speed than the 1800X, although further benchmarks are necessary to quantify this. The expected launch price of $329 includes a Wraith Prism cooler and is in the same price bracket as the 1800X and Intel’s Coffee Lake i7-8700K. Whilst the 6 core, 12 thread 8700K beats the 2700X in single and quad core performance by around 15%, the 2700X wins on multi-core workloads. PC gaming and desktop performance is generally governed by six or less cores but the 2700X offers value for money to workstation users. Even though the 2700X excels at video production, streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

AMD’s 16 core, 32 thread Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is finally here to seize the throne for high end desktop processors. The 1950X is the flagship of the Zen based Threadripper series which also includes the 12 core 1920X and the 8 core 1900X. The 1950X has a stock clock of 3.4 GHz increasing to a maximum single core boost of 4.0 GHz and features quad channel DDR4 and 64 PCI Express lanes. This processor is effectively two Ryzen 7 1800Xs glued together with Infinity Fabric (AMD’s scalable interconnecting technology), making the 1950X one of the physically largest CPUs on the consumer market. If you are considering this CPU, you will need a new X399 motherboard with a TR4 socket. Early benchmarks show the 1950X competing with Intel’s similarly priced i9-7900X. Whilst the 7900X has slightly higher single and quad core scores (10%-15%), the 1950X is around 35% faster for multi-core workloads. Content creators, and other core intensive task masters will not be disappointed. [Aug '17 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
159,077
23,641
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback