AMD100-100000022BOX
IntelBX8070110600K
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
233 EFps 284 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+22%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
101 EFps 106 EFps +5%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
131 EFps 139 EFps Slightly Better Overwatch EFps.
+6%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
119 EFps 139 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+17%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
131 EFps 139 EFps Slightly Better Fortnite EFps.
+6%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 365,910 user samples
294,959 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 92% Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 74% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 0.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 74% Great: 92%
SPEED RANK: 192nd / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
70,951 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 100% Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 81% Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Poor: 81% Great: 100%
SPEED RANK: 128th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
84.1 % 92.2 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+10%
10 Mar21|HardwareLUXX
Processor non grata: Rocket Lake-S...
9 % BFV 11%, SotTR 11%, MetroEx 3%, Divis2 11%
20 Oct22|Techpowerup
Intel Core i5-13600K Review - Best...
8 % Forza5 5%, AoE4 14%, Bord3 9%, FarC6 10%, WatchDL 1%, BFV 12%, CPunk 5%, EldenR 6%, RDR2 13%, Civ6 7%, CSGO 9%, DoomE 2%
05 Nov20|Techpowerup
AMD Ryzen 5 5800X Review
8 % FarC5 21%, BFV 12%, SotTR 2%, Rage2 0%, Witcher3 3%, Civ6 12%, ACO 1%, MetroEx 8%, Sekiro 20%, Wolf2 2%
28 May20|Techpowerup
Intel Core i5-10400F Review - Six ...
8 % FarC5 21%, BFV 12%, SotTR 2%, Rage2 0%, Witcher3 3%, Civ6 12%, ACO 6%, MetroEx 7%, Sekiro 20%, Wolf2 2%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
76.9 Pts 90.5 Pts Lower memory latency.
+18%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
136 Pts 137 Pts +1%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
264 Pts 268 Pts +2%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
490 Pts 505 Pts +3%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
808 Pts 825 Pts +2%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
87.1 Pts 96.6 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+11%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
146 Pts 149 Pts +2%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
287 Pts 296 Pts +3%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
553 Pts 569 Pts +3%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
878 Pts 918 Pts +5%
Market Share
Based on 67,824,585 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.25 % 0.38 % Much higher market share.
+52%
Value
Value For Money
90.8 % 111 % Better value.
+22%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
69 % 89 % More popular.
+29%
Price
Price (score)
$210 $144 Much cheaper.
+32%
Age
Newest
58 Months 48 Months More recent.
+17%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
95 Watts More energy efficient.
+24%
125 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
6 cores 6 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
12 threads 12 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
7 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+50%
14 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.8 GHz 4.1 GHz Slightly faster base frequency.
+8%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.4 GHz 4.8 GHz Slightly faster turbo frequency.
+9%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1106 Pts 1154 Pts +4%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1017 Pts 1041 Pts +2%
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen2 Comet Lake
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 FCLGA1200
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None UHD 630
ADVERTISEMENT

Early Q3 of 2019 sees the release of the new Ryzen 5 3600X: a hex-core, 12-thread processor. AMD are releasing five new CPUs based on their latest Zen 2 microarchitecture which delivers approximately 13% better IPC than the previous 12nm Zen+. For workstation builds the 3600X is viable, however, the $200 USD Ryzen 5 3600 represents a far better value proposition. The additional $40 USD for the 3600X basically buys a better cooler (Spire vs Stealth). This allows for an extra 200 MHz of extra base and boost clock: 3.8 / 4.4 GHz on the 3600X vs 3.6 / 4.2 GHz on the 3600, this translates to approximately 2% higher overclocked performance for 20% more money. Neither of the stock coolers on the 3600 or 3600X are as effective as a $20 USD aftermarket cooler such as the Gammaxx 400. The 3600 with a Gammaxx 400 outperforms the 3600X with a Spire cooler and when both use a Gammaxx 400 they are more or less identical. The 3600X SKU is basically a marketing gimmick designed to milk unsuspecting consumers. Comparing the 3600X to Intel’s overclocked flagship i5-9600K shows that although the 3600X has 29% faster 64-core speed, it is around 11% worse for gaming (sub eight core performance). Additionally, the 3600X's memory controller, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency which can also impact gaming. The arrival of Zen 2 marks the end of the "Sandy Bridge (i5-2500K)" era, Intel can no longer rely exclusively on their single-core advantage to dominate the market, they must also compete on price. [Jul '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Intel’s tenth gen, six-core i5-10600K is one of the fastest consumer CPUs currently available. Out of the box, its maximum all core frequency is 4.5 GHz, but a simple overclock allows all 12 threads to hit 5.0 GHz. Although a new Z490 (LGA1200) motherboard is required, Intel have indicated that LGA1200 will remain compatible with Rocket Lake CPUs which are due later this year. The eight-core Ryzen 3700X currently competes in the 10600K’s price bracket. CPU based encoding is akin to using hair clippers on a lawn but If dedicated hardware such as NVENC or QuickSync is not an option, the 3700X can outperform the 10600K in encoding workloads such as UserBenchmark 64-core, Cinebench, Blender-CPU and Handbrake-CPU. Meanwhile, the 10600K is better for almost everything else. Currently, the real problem with the 10600K, and much of the Comet Lake line up, is availability. Whilst there was a paper launch in Q2 2020, at the time of writing, the 10600K is still largely unavailable for purchase. In order to achieve better value for money, without compromising on gaming performance, it is necessary to consider the older generation 9600K which is 26% cheaper and offers similar gaming performance. [Jun '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback