Today's hottest deals
AMD100-100000022BOX
AMD100-100000059WOF

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.8GHz, Zen2.
Release date: Q3 2019.

16 Cores, 32 Threads @3.4GHz, Zen3.
Release date: Q4 2020.

CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
233 EFps 318 EFps Much Better CSGO EFps.
+36%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
101 EFps 108 EFps Slightly Better GTAV EFps.
+7%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
131 EFps 142 EFps Slightly Better Overwatch EFps.
+8%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
119 EFps 133 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+12%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
131 EFps Slightly Better Fortnite EFps.
+8%
121 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 327,985 user samples
294,959 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 92% Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 74% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 0.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 74% Great: 92%
SPEED RANK: 213th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
33,026 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 110% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 90% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 90% Great: 110%
SPEED RANK: 85th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
84.1 % 100 % Faster effective speed.
+19%
20 Oct22|HardwareLUXX
The Dino Intel is not yet extinct:...
CPunk 13% 19 % Control 17%, SpiderM 22%, RiftB 44%, TWarTroy 26%, F122 27%, DoomE 11%
10 Mar21|HardwareLUXX
Processor non grata: Rocket Lake-S...
17 % BFV 9%, SotTR 19%, MetroEx 20%, Divis2 19%
20 Oct22|Techpowerup
Intel Core i5-13600K Review - Best...
WatchDL 0% 20 % Forza5 9%, AoE4 15%, Bord3 21%, FarC6 11%, BFV 31%, CPunk 6%, EldenR 13%, RDR2 4%, Civ6 81%, CSGO 50%, DoomE 6%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
76.9 Pts 81 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+5%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
136 Pts 164 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+21%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
264 Pts 326 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+23%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
490 Pts 639 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+30%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
808 Pts 1,232 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+52%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
87.1 Pts 92.7 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+6%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
146 Pts 180 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+23%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
287 Pts 355 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+24%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
553 Pts 697 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+26%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
878 Pts 1,376 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+57%
Market Share
Based on 69,053,330 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.24 % Much higher market share.
+41%
0.17 %
Value
Value For Money
95.5 % +2% 93.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
70 % +1% 69 %
Price
Price (score)
$175 Much cheaper.
+51%
$358
Age
Newest
64 Months 48 Months More recent.
+25%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
95 Watts Slightly more energy efficient.
+10%
105 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
6 cores 16 cores Hugely higher core count.
+167%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
12 threads 32 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+167%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
7 nm 7 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.8 GHz Faster base frequency.
+12%
3.4 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.4 GHz 4.9 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+11%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1,106 Pts 3,063 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+177%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1,017 Pts 2,633 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+159%
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen2 Zen3
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None

Early Q3 of 2019 sees the release of the new Ryzen 5 3600X: a hex-core, 12-thread processor. AMD are releasing five new CPUs based on their latest Zen 2 microarchitecture which delivers approximately 13% better IPC than the previous 12nm Zen+. For workstation builds the 3600X is viable, however, the $200 USD Ryzen 5 3600 represents a far better value proposition. The additional $40 USD for the 3600X basically buys a better cooler (Spire vs Stealth). This allows for an extra 200 MHz of extra base and boost clock: 3.8 / 4.4 GHz on the 3600X vs 3.6 / 4.2 GHz on the 3600, this translates to approximately 2% higher overclocked performance for 20% more money. Neither of the stock coolers on the 3600 or 3600X are as effective as a $20 USD aftermarket cooler such as the Gammaxx 400. The 3600 with a Gammaxx 400 outperforms the 3600X with a Spire cooler and when both use a Gammaxx 400 they are more or less identical. The 3600X SKU is basically a marketing gimmick designed to milk unsuspecting consumers. Comparing the 3600X to Intel’s overclocked flagship i5-9600K shows that although the 3600X has 29% faster 64-core speed, it is around 11% worse for gaming (sub eight core performance). Additionally, the 3600X's memory controller, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency which can also impact gaming. The arrival of Zen 2 marks the end of the "Sandy Bridge (i5-2500K)" era, Intel can no longer rely exclusively on their single-core advantage to dominate the market, they must also compete on price. [Jul '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The 16-core, 32-thread Ryzen 9 5950X is an impressive workhorse. It sits at the top of AMD’s latest Zen 3 based, 5000 series of CPUs and sends a clear message that AMD can beat Intel in terms of raw performance and core count. The 5950X has a boost clock speed of up to 4.9 GHz, a massive 72 MB cache and a TDP rating of 105W. Despite the “gaming” focus of AMD’s 5000 series launch marketing, the 5950X does not efficiently leverage all its 16 cores in gaming (as demonstrated by similar effective speed scores compared to the 12-core 5900X, 8-core 5800X and 6-core 5600X.) 16 cores are only suitable for professional use cases that have CPU processing needs which cannot be more efficiently met by a GPU or other dedicated hardware. There is no Intel equivalent with this number of cores, and the 5950X’s uniqueness is reflected in its $799 USD price tag, 45% more expensive than the 5900X. Gamers will get far higher FPS per dollar by allocating a higher proportion of their budget towards a better GPU rather than blowing $799 USD on the 5950X. Professional users that plan to use 32 concurrent threads at 100% load will find value in the 5950X. On the other hand, workstation users that rarely exceed 20 concurrent threads at 100% should consider the 10850K for around half the money. [Nov '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback