AMD100-100000022BOX
AMD100-100000061WOF
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
233 EFps 318 EFps Much Better CSGO EFps.
+36%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
101 EFps 108 EFps Slightly Better GTAV EFps.
+7%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
131 EFps 142 EFps Slightly Better Overwatch EFps.
+8%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
119 EFps 133 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+12%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
131 EFps Slightly Better Fortnite EFps.
+8%
121 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 355,091 user samples
294,959 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 92% Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 74% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 0.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 74% Great: 92%
SPEED RANK: 192nd / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
60,132 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 108% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 87% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Poor: 87% Great: 108%
SPEED RANK: 79th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
84.1 % 99 % Faster effective speed.
+18%
10 Mar21|HardwareLUXX
Processor non grata: Rocket Lake-S...
16 % BFV 7%, SotTR 18%, MetroEx 20%, Divis2 18%
20 Oct22|Techpowerup
Intel Core i5-13600K Review - Best...
WatchDL 2% 19 % Forza5 9%, AoE4 15%, Bord3 20%, FarC6 10%, BFV 30%, CPunk 6%, EldenR 12%, RDR2 4%, Civ6 73%, CSGO 48%, DoomE 6%
05 Nov20|Techpowerup
AMD Ryzen 5 5800X Review
ACO 0% 7 % FarC5 25%, BFV 8%, SotTR 0%, Rage2 2%, Witcher3 1%, Civ6 16%, MetroEx 2%, Sekiro 17%, Wolf2 2%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
76.9 Pts 81.1 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+5%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
136 Pts 163 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+20%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
264 Pts 320 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+21%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
490 Pts 626 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+28%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
808 Pts 1157 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+43%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
87.1 Pts 92.3 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+6%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
146 Pts 179 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+23%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
287 Pts 356 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+24%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
553 Pts 694 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+25%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
878 Pts 1318 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+50%
Market Share
Based on 67,721,340 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.15 % 0.51 % Hugely higher market share.
+240%
Value
Value For Money
90.8 % 102 % Better value.
+12%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
70 % 72 % +3%
Price
Price (score)
$210 Cheaper.
+16%
$249
Age
Newest
57 Months 41 Months More recent.
+28%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
95 Watts Slightly more energy efficient.
+10%
105 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
6 cores 12 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
12 threads 24 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
7 nm 7 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.8 GHz +3% 3.7 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.4 GHz 4.8 GHz Slightly faster turbo frequency.
+9%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1106 Pts 2290 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+107%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1017 Pts 2000 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+97%
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen2 Zen3
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

Early Q3 of 2019 sees the release of the new Ryzen 5 3600X: a hex-core, 12-thread processor. AMD are releasing five new CPUs based on their latest Zen 2 microarchitecture which delivers approximately 13% better IPC than the previous 12nm Zen+. For workstation builds the 3600X is viable, however, the $200 USD Ryzen 5 3600 represents a far better value proposition. The additional $40 USD for the 3600X basically buys a better cooler (Spire vs Stealth). This allows for an extra 200 MHz of extra base and boost clock: 3.8 / 4.4 GHz on the 3600X vs 3.6 / 4.2 GHz on the 3600, this translates to approximately 2% higher overclocked performance for 20% more money. Neither of the stock coolers on the 3600 or 3600X are as effective as a $20 USD aftermarket cooler such as the Gammaxx 400. The 3600 with a Gammaxx 400 outperforms the 3600X with a Spire cooler and when both use a Gammaxx 400 they are more or less identical. The 3600X SKU is basically a marketing gimmick designed to milk unsuspecting consumers. Comparing the 3600X to Intel’s overclocked flagship i5-9600K shows that although the 3600X has 29% faster 64-core speed, it is around 11% worse for gaming (sub eight core performance). Additionally, the 3600X's memory controller, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency which can also impact gaming. The arrival of Zen 2 marks the end of the "Sandy Bridge (i5-2500K)" era, Intel can no longer rely exclusively on their single-core advantage to dominate the market, they must also compete on price. [Jul '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Ryzen 9 5900X is second in AMD’s line-up of new Zen 3 CPUs. The 12-core hyper-threaded processor has base/boost clock speeds of 3.7/4.8 GHz, a 70 MB cache and a TDP of 105W. The 5900X took center stage in the 5000 series launch presentation where AMD gunned for Intel’s “best gaming CPU” crown. They showed the 5900X as being 26% better for gaming than the previous generation’s Ryzen 9 3900XT, attributing this to the new architecture’s faster single core speeds and lower latency. AMD also stated that the 5900X achieves, on average, 6.8% faster gaming performance than Intel’s 10-core i9-10900K. The details around AMD’s testing were not disclosed but it is safe to assume that 6.8% is the highest average lead that AMD are willing to stand by. Our benchmarks show that the 5900X’s slightly faster cores and the 10900K’s slightly lower memory latency balance out to yield similar performance. Whilst presenting their figures, AMD admitted that their 3000 series CPUs were far from “best for gaming” and conceded that the 10900K is approximately 19% faster than the 3900XT (our effective speed marks the gap at just 14%). Despite this clear performance deficiency, AMD supported 3000 series sales with an aggressive and successful marketing campaign to easily outsell Intel over the last 12 months. Given the real performance uplift observed in the 5000 series, and the absence of any meaningful marketing from Intel, we expect CPU sales to shift even further in AMD’s favour. Gamers that do not wish to pay “marketing fees” should investigate Intel’s $175 USD 11400F, the $660 USD savings would be far better spent on a higher tier GPU. [Nov '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback