UserBenchmark: AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i7-11700K

CPU
RANKINGS

TEST
YOUR CPU

ADD TO PC
BUILD

AMDYD2600BBAFBOX

BUY • $155

IntelBX8070811700K

BUY • $270

BenchYourCPU

Watch Gameplay


CSGO Dust 2 1080p Max	198 EFps	306 EFps	Much Better CSGO EFps. +55%
GTAV Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max	96 EFps	109 EFps	Better GTAV EFps. +14%
Overwatch Temple of Anubis 1080p Max	135 EFps	146 EFps	Slightly Better Overwatch EFps. +8%
PUBG M249 Training 1080p Max	113 EFps	147 EFps	Much Better PUBG EFps. +30%
Fortnite UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max	115 EFps	136 EFps	Better Fortnite EFps. +18%

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 245,239 user samples

Benchmark your CPU here

179,588 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 81% Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 67% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)

Poor: 67% Great: 81%

SPEED RANK: 331^st / 1442

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

65,651 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 110% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 86% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)

Poor: 86% Great: 110%

SPEED RANK: 67^th / 1442

Gaming 101%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 102%

UFO


Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed		73.3 %			101 %	Much faster effective speed. +38%


Memory Avg. Memory Latency	76.6 Pts	88 Pts	Lower memory latency. +15%
1-Core Avg. Single Core Speed	108 Pts	164 Pts	Much faster single-core speed. +52%
2-Core Avg. Dual Core Speed	210 Pts	320 Pts	Much faster dual-core speed. +52%
4-Core Avg. Quad Core Speed	377 Pts	614 Pts	Much faster quad-core speed. +63%
8-Core Avg. Octa Core Speed	621 Pts	1075 Pts	Much faster octa-core speed. +73%


Memory OC Memory Latency	83.8 Pts	95.5 Pts	Lower OC memory latency. +14%
1-Core OC Single Core Speed	118 Pts	176 Pts	Much faster OC single-core speed. +49%
2-Core OC Dual Core Speed	232 Pts	348 Pts	Much faster OC dual-core speed. +50%
4-Core OC Quad Core Speed	446 Pts	679 Pts	Much faster OC quad-core speed. +52%
8-Core OC Octa Core Speed	676 Pts	1249 Pts	Hugely faster OC octa-core speed. +85%

Market Share

Based on 67,756,253 CPUs tested

See market share leaders


Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days)	0.48 %		0.58 %	Higher market share. +21%
Value Value For Money	86.1 %		102 %	Better value. +19%
User Rating UBM User Rating	76 %		94 %	More popular. +24%
Price Price (score)	$155	Much cheaper. +43%	$270


Age Newest	72 Months		37 Months	Much more recent. +49%
TDP Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watts	Much more energy efficient. +48%	125 Watts
Cores CPU Processing Cores	6 cores		8 cores	Much higher core count. +33%
Threads CPU Processing Threads	12 threads		16 threads	Much higher thread count. +33%
Lithography Manufacturing process	12 nm	Newer manufacturing. +14%	14 nm
Base Clock Base Clock Speed	3.4 GHz		3.6 GHz	Slightly faster base frequency. +6%
Turbo Clock Turbo Clock Speed	3.9 GHz		5 GHz	Faster turbo frequency. +28%
64-Core OC Multi Core Speed	889 Pts		1699 Pts	Hugely faster OC 64-core speed. +91%
64-Core Avg. Multi Core Speed	800 Pts		1539 Pts	Hugely faster 64-core speed. +92%


Series CPU Architecture	Zen+	Rocket Lake
Socket Motherboard Socket	AM4	FCLGA1200
Graphics Integrated Graphics	None	UHD 750

The Ryzen 5 2600, from AMD’s second generation (Zen+) of high-end desktop Ryzen processors, supersedes the first generation Ryzen 5 1600. The newer generation sees a lithography reduction from 14nm to 12nm, but no increase in the number of cores and threads (6 and 12 respectively) over the ground-breaking first generation which continues to surpass similarly priced Intel CPUs in terms of multi-core performance. In other words, progress between generations is predominantly driven by power efficiency and therefore higher attainable clock speeds. The 2600 appears to have a stock base/boost clock of 3.4 / 3.9 GHz compared to the 1600’s 3.2 / 3.6 GHz which is expected to result in a modest increase in effective speed that said, early benchmarks are inconclusive. Included in the expected retail price of about $200 is a Wraith Stealth cooler, so the 2600, like the 1600 before it, represents great value for workstation users. The 2600 compliments the new 400 series motherboards and is also backwards compatible with the 300 series following a bios update. Even though the 2600 is plausible for multimedia production streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. ^{[Apr '18 CPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

The i7-11700K is the second fastest CPU in Intel’s 11th Gen Rocket Lake-S lineup which brings higher IPC (early samples indicate +19%) and 50% stronger integrated graphics. There are also 500 series chipset improvements including: 20 PCIe4 CPU lanes (up from 16) and USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20 Gbps up from 10 Gbps). Rocket Lake’s IPC uplift translates to around a 10% faster Effective Speed than both Intel's 10th Gen and AMD’s 5000 series. Despite Intel’s performance lead, AMD continues to outsell Intel. Given the scale of Intel's operation, it’s inexplicable that their marketing remains so neglected. Little effort is made to counter widespread disinformation such as: “it uses too much electricity” or the classic: “it needs more cores”. Intel’s marketing samples are routinely distributed to reviewers that appear better incentivized to bury Intel's products rather than review them. Not enabling XMP or only testing with BIOS power limits enabled is akin to leaving the handbrake on during a race. Mind-numbing “scientific” and rendering benchmarks are presented as gospel. Different games, mostly unplayed by real users, are cherry picked for each “review”. When it's convenient, canned game benchmarks are chosen such as Ulletical’s CSGO which runs at nearly double the in-game fps. Credible benchmark data, which necessarily includes replicable video footage from popular games, is the exception rather than the rule. At every release, AMD’s marketers coordinate narratives to ensure another feast of blue blubber. Nonetheless, towards the end of 2021, Intel’s Golden Cove is due to offer an additional 20-30% performance increase. At that time, with a net 30-40% performance lead, Intel will probably regain significant market share despite AMD's class-leading marketing. In the meantime, most PC gamers need look no further than the 11400F. ^{[Feb '21 CPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

Systems with these CPUs

Top Builds that include these CPUs

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. ^[CPUPro]

Group Test Results

Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

How it works

- Download and run UserBenchmark
- CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
- GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
- Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
- RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
- SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
- Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
- Identify the strongest components in your PC
- See speed test results from other users
- Compare your components to the current market leaders
- Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
- Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ

AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021

How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?

What is multi core mixed speed?

What is multi core integer speed?

What is multi core floating point speed?

What is single core mixed CPU speed?

What is quad core mixed CPU speed?

What is quad core floating point speed?

What is quad core integer speed?

What is single core floating point speed?

What is single core integer speed?

What is the GeekBench single core score?

What is a CPU?

What is the effective CPU speed index?

What is overclocking?

What is thermal design power (TDP)?

ALL FAQs »

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MORE DETAILS

MORE DETAILS

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

Group Test Results

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Feedback