Today's hottest deals
AMDYD160XBCAEWOF
IntelBX80601920

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.6GHz, Zen.
Release date: Q2 2017.

4 Cores, 8 Threads @2.66GHz, Nehalem.
Release date: Q3 2008.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 209,514 user samples
140,440 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 82% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 62% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Poor: 62% Great: 82%
SPEED RANK: 340th / 1463
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
69,074 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 72% Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 46% Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 0.95 GHz (avg)
Poor: 46% Great: 72%
SPEED RANK: 576th / 1463
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
73.7 % Faster effective speed.
+20%
61.6 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
73.1 Pts 84.9 Pts Lower memory latency.
+16%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
110 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+70%
64.7 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
215 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+73%
124 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
400 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+90%
211 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
646 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+117%
298 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
80.7 Pts 94.7 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+17%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
120 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+42%
84.8 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
239 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+48%
161 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
461 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+65%
279 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
725 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+87%
388 Pts
Market Share
Based on 68,595,271 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.06 % Higher market share.
+20%
0.05 %
Value
Value For Money
91.8 % Slightly better value.
+9%
83.9 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
68 % More popular.
+26%
54 %
Price
Price (score)
$125 $90 Cheaper.
+28%
Age
Newest
89 Months Much more recent.
+54%
192 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
95 Watts More energy efficient.
+27%
130 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
6 cores Much higher core count.
+50%
4 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
12 threads Much higher thread count.
+50%
8 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
14 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+69%
45 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.6 GHz Much faster base frequency.
+35%
2.66 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4 GHz Much faster turbo frequency.
+37%
2.93 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
917 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+130%
399 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
834 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+173%
306 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen Nehalem
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 LGA1366
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None

The Ryzen 5 1600X is the flagship processor from AMD's latest generation of Ryzen 5 processors which feature the Zen architecture. Following on from last month's release of the Ryzen 7 series, the Ryzen 5 series is positioned as a less expensive mid-performance alternative to Intel's i5 mainstream offerings. Once again, AMD excels in multi-core technology. Like the Ryzen 5 1600, the 1600X features 6 cores and 12 threads, but has roughly 11% higher clock speeds (out of the box) for a 14% premium. Like all Ryzen CPUs the 1600X is unlocked. The 1600X is the only Ryzen 5 CPU with a TDP of 95W, the 1600, 1500X and 1400 all have 50% lower power consumption of 65W. Due to its high thread count, UserBenchmarks show that at stock clocks the 1600X outperforms the i7-7700k on multi-threaded tasks by 23%, but it lags behind by 23% for single and 14% for quad-core performance. The 1600X is priced keenly at $249 so a more appropriate CPU comparison is the i5-7600k where the 1600X wins on stock multi-core by a whopping 81%. The 1600X does represent great value for workstation users that also game but its $30 cheaper sibling, the 1600 (non x version), which includes a cooler and has great overclocking potential out of the box is arguably the the value king in this segment. [Apr '17 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Intel Core i7-920 is five and a half years old which puts it at an enormous disadvantage to more modern processors. The 920 sports four cores and eight threads which is the same basic configuration that Intel still uses in the majority of their i7s. Comparing the 920 to the 4770K, its modern day equivalent, shows that 920 lags by 63% at stock speeds and by 44% when both processors are overclocked. Overclocking improves the 920 by 30% vs just 17% for the 4770K. Aside from approximately 50% more calculation throughput the 4770K offers lower power consumption, compatibility with Intel's latest FCLGA1150 platform, on-board graphics and newer CPU instructions. Owners of the 920 should probably consider upgrading not only to improve system response times but also to take advantage of the newer platform. [Mar '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback