Today's hottest deals
AMDHDE00ZFBGRBOX
AMDFD8150FRGUBOX

6 Cores, 6 Threads @3.3GHz, K10.
Release date: Q4 2010.

8 Cores, 8 Threads @3.6GHz, Bulldozer.
Release date: Q4 2011.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 34,950 user samples
12,769 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 66% Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 51% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Poor: 51% Great: 66%
SPEED RANK: 624th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
22,181 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 66% Base clock 4.65 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 38% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Poor: 38% Great: 66%
SPEED RANK: 627th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
58.6 % +0% 58.6 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
81 Pts +3% 78.7 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
53.3 Pts 62 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+16%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
106 Pts 117 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+10%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
200 Pts 210 Pts +5%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
281 Pts 329 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+17%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
92 Pts +4% 88.2 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
58.4 Pts 72.8 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+25%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
117 Pts 140 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+20%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
233 Pts 255 Pts Slightly faster OC quad-core speed.
+9%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
341 Pts 398 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+17%
Market Share
Based on 69,028,705 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0 % 0.01 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
Value
Value For Money
55.5 % Better value.
+25%
44.2 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
54 % +2% 53 %
Price
Price (score)
$340 Much cheaper.
+56%
$770
Age
Newest
167 Months 157 Months Slightly more recent.
+6%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
125 Watts 125 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
6 cores 8 cores Much higher core count.
+33%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
6 threads 8 threads Much higher thread count.
+33%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
45 nm 32 nm Newer manufacturing.
+29%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.3 GHz 3.6 GHz Slightly faster base frequency.
+9%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
3.7 GHz 4.2 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+14%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
345 Pts 398 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+15%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
285 Pts 335 Pts Faster 64-core speed.
+18%
Series
CPU Architecture
K10 Bulldozer
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM3 AM3+
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None

The AMD Phenom II X6 1100T was the last, in a long line of Phenom II X6's. The series went 1045T, 1055T, 1065T, 1075T, 1090T and finally 1100T. Each successive release was clocked slightly higher ending with the 1100T which had a base/turbo clock speed of 3.3/3.7 GHz. The X6 has six processing cores and demonstrates very good multi-core performance but it is less able to handle single and dual core workloads, which is what the majority of consumer desktop computing requires. The X6 series were good overclockers with the ability to boost stock clocks by around 20%. Comparing the 1100T to the similarly priced i5-2400 shows that Intel's mid-range Sandy Bridge processor, which was released just a month after the 1100T, was around 8% faster for single and dual core workloads but slower by a staggering 30% for multi-core workloads. [Mar '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD FX-8150 is the earliest eight core variant in AMD's flagship FX series. The FX-8150 was released in October 2011 and at that time it superseded the Phenom 1100T. Comparing the 1100T and FX-8150 shows that the newer FX-8150 has roughly the same single and dual core speed but, thanks to its extra two cores, pulled ahead of its predecessor by 15% in multi-core tests. The performance improvements over the 1100T are accompanied by an improved manufacturing process which reduced lithography from 45 to 32 nanometres; consequently both processors have the same maximum TDP of 125 Watts. Thanks to its eight cores the FX-8150 has strong multi-core performance but its single-core core speeds are still relatively weak compared to similarly priced Intel chips. [Mar '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback