Today's hottest deals
AMDHDT55TFBGRBOX
AMDHDE00ZFBGRBOX

6 Cores, 6 Threads @2.8GHz, K10.
Release date: Q2 2010.

6 Cores, 6 Threads @3.3GHz, K10.
Release date: Q4 2010.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 36,604 user samples
23,835 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 61% Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 46% Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Poor: 46% Great: 61%
SPEED RANK: 719th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
12,769 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 66% Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 51% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Poor: 51% Great: 66%
SPEED RANK: 624th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
54 % 58.6 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+9%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
78 Pts 81 Pts +4%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
46.6 Pts 53.3 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+14%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
91.3 Pts 106 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+16%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
166 Pts 200 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+20%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
231 Pts 281 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+22%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
88.8 Pts 92 Pts +4%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
53.5 Pts 58.4 Pts Slightly faster OC single-core speed.
+9%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
106 Pts 117 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+10%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
201 Pts 233 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+16%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
284 Pts 341 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+20%
Market Share
Based on 69,031,926 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.01 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
0 %
Value
Value For Money
61.3 % Better value.
+11%
55.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
54 % 54 %
Price
Price (score)
$175 Much cheaper.
+49%
$340
Age
Newest
175 Months 167 Months +5%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
95 Watts More energy efficient.
+24%
125 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
6 cores 6 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
6 threads 6 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
45 nm 45 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
2.8 GHz 3.3 GHz Faster base frequency.
+18%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
3.3 GHz 3.7 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+12%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
285 Pts 345 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+21%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
236 Pts 285 Pts Faster 64-core speed.
+21%
Series
CPU Architecture
K10 K10
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM3 AM3
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None

The AMD Phenom II X6 1055T was the second in a long line of X6's, each successive revision received a small clock speed boost. The 1055T was clocked at 2.8 GHz base and 3.3 GHz turbo. The 1100T was the fastest X6 and has a base/turbo clock of 3.3/3.7 GHz. Comparing the 1055T and 1100T shows that the two processors have a very similar performance profile, both excelling at multi-core workloads and both showing relative weakness in single, and dual-core workloads. In todays market the bar has been raised several notches especially for single and dual core workloads but the 1055T still puts in a relatively strong multi-core performance which is roughly on a par with an Ivy Bridge i5-3570K[Mar '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD Phenom II X6 1100T was the last, in a long line of Phenom II X6's. The series went 1045T, 1055T, 1065T, 1075T, 1090T and finally 1100T. Each successive release was clocked slightly higher ending with the 1100T which had a base/turbo clock speed of 3.3/3.7 GHz. The X6 has six processing cores and demonstrates very good multi-core performance but it is less able to handle single and dual core workloads, which is what the majority of consumer desktop computing requires. The X6 series were good overclockers with the ability to boost stock clocks by around 20%. Comparing the 1100T to the similarly priced i5-2400 shows that Intel's mid-range Sandy Bridge processor, which was released just a month after the 1100T, was around 8% faster for single and dual core workloads but slower by a staggering 30% for multi-core workloads. [Mar '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback