AMDHDZ955FBGMBOX
IntelAW8063801032301

4 Cores, 4 Threads @3.2GHz, K10.
Release date: Q1 2009.

2 Cores, 4 Threads @2.5GHz, Ivy Bridge.
Release date: Q2 2012.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 121,147 user samples
41,403 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 60% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 38% Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 38% Great: 60%
SPEED RANK: 762nd / 1451
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
79,744 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 57% Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 31% Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Poor: 31% Great: 57%
SPEED RANK: 868th / 1451
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
51.5 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+8%
47.8 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
76 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+8%
70.4 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
45.5 Pts 61.4 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+35%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
90.1 Pts 106 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+18%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
158 Pts Slightly faster quad-core speed.
+7%
148 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
163 Pts Slightly faster octa-core speed.
+5%
155 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
87.8 Pts +4% 84.6 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
54.3 Pts 76 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+40%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
108 Pts 129 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+19%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
205 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+11%
185 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
207 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+11%
187 Pts
Market Share
Based on 68,070,555 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0 % 0.06 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
Value
Value For Money
71.8 % 75.8 % Slightly better value.
+6%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
55 % +2% 54 %
Price
Price (score)
$83 $52 Much cheaper.
+37%
Age
Newest
183 Months 146 Months More recent.
+20%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
125 Watts 35 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+72%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
4 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100%
2 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
4 threads 4 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
45 nm 22 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+51%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.2 GHz Faster base frequency.
+28%
2.5 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
3.2 GHz +3% 3.1 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
207 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+11%
186 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
165 Pts Slightly faster 64-core speed.
+6%
156 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
K10 Ivy Bridge
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM3 FCBGA1023
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None HD 4000
ADVERTISEMENT

The AMD Phenom II X4 955 is a quad-core processor based on the K10 micro-architecture. When it launched in Q2 of 2009, it was AMD’s fastest CPU. Given its base clock of 3.2 GHz, with appropriate cooling, this unlocked Black Edition chip can be overclocked to speeds in excess of 4 GHz. The 955’s effective speed of 63 isn’t impressive by today’s standards, but when coupled with a decent graphics card, it won't cause major bottlenecks for most games. The 955 was pitched against the high-end of Intel’s Core 2 quads, and now costs a fraction of its original list price as one would expect, however there are better alternatives on the market now. [Dec '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Intel Core i5-3210M is a third generation (Ivy bridge) mobile CPU. Sporting two cores and four threads the 3210M has a maximum turbo clock speed of 3.1 GHz which produces an effective speed of 64.4 or 52% below the modern day group average . For heavily threaded tasks the 3210M is handicapped significantly by its dual core architecture and lags modern CPUs by around 165%. The i5-3210M comes equipped with onboard HD 4000 graphics, which is more than enough for typical desktop use but will struggle with anything but the simplest of 3D games. With a TDP of just 35 Watts the i5-3210M allows for reasonable, but not brilliant, battery life. [Oct '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback