COMPARE
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
AMDHDZ955FBGMBOX
AMDFD832EWMHKBOX
▲ 551,970 ▼

4 Cores, 4 Threads @3.2GHz, K10.
Release date: Q1 2009.

VS
▲ 542,882 ▼

8 Cores, 8 Threads @3.2GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q3 2014.

Effective Speed 
+12%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 74,602 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
41,403 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 60% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 38% Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 38% Great: 60%
SPEED RANK: 752nd / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
33,199 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 65% Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 47% Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 47% Great: 65%
SPEED RANK: 616th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		51.5 % 57.8 % Faster effective speed.
+12%
Average Score 
+32%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		76 Pts 80.6 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+6%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		45.5 Pts 58.8 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+29%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		90.1 Pts 108 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+20%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		158 Pts 191 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+21%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		163 Pts 298 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+83%
Overclocked Score 
+31%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		87.8 Pts 91.4 Pts +4%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		54.3 Pts 70.4 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+30%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		108 Pts 134 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+24%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		205 Pts 238 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+16%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		207 Pts 370 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+79%
Value & Sentiment 
+1%
Market Share
Based on 67,776,437 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.01 % 0.01 %
Value
Value For Money 		71.8 % 79.6 % Better value.
+11%
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		55 % +2% 54 %
Price
Price (score) 		$83 +4% $87
Nice To Haves 
+54%
Age
Newest 		181 Months 115 Months Much more recent.
+36%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		125 Watts 95 Watts More energy efficient.
+24%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		4 cores 8 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		4 threads 8 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100%
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		45 nm 32 nm Newer manufacturing.
+29%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		3.2 GHz 3.2 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		3.2 GHz 4 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+25%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		207 Pts 378 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+83%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		165 Pts 305 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+85%
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		K10 Piledriver
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		AM3 AM3+
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		None None
Conclusion 
Average Bench 51.5%
Average Bench 57.8%
ADVERTISEMENT

The AMD Phenom II X4 955 is a quad-core processor based on the K10 micro-architecture. When it launched in Q2 of 2009, it was AMD’s fastest CPU. Given its base clock of 3.2 GHz, with appropriate cooling, this unlocked Black Edition chip can be overclocked to speeds in excess of 4 GHz. The 955’s effective speed of 63 isn’t impressive by today’s standards, but when coupled with a decent graphics card, it won't cause major bottlenecks for most games. The 955 was pitched against the high-end of Intel’s Core 2 quads, and now costs a fraction of its original list price as one would expect, however there are better alternatives on the market now. [Dec '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The FX-8320E is a Vishera eight core processor based on AMD’s Piledriver architecture. The ‘E’ in the FX-8320E denotes energy efficiency with the FX-8320E boasting a TDP of 95 Watts which is relatively low for FX processors. The FX-8320E was launched in September 2014 at the same time as the FX-8370E. Comparing the 8370E and 8320E shows that the performance profiles are similar with the 25% more expensive 8370E edging ahead, particularly on single core workloads. The 8370E is clocked slightly higher with base/turbo frequencies of 3.3/4.3 GHz versus the 8320E’s 3.2/4.0 GHz. Overall the 8320E scores a mediocre effective speed of 70. Whilst this is sufficient for the majority of desktop applications: web-surfing, word-processing and playing movies, better single-core performance is offered by any number of Intel processors. [Dec '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
41,403
33,199
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback