AMDFD832EWMHKBOX
IntelBX80648I75820K

8 Cores, 8 Threads @3.2GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q3 2014.

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.3GHz, Haswell-E.
Release date: Q3 2014.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 134,893 user samples
33,199 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 65% Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 47% Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 47% Great: 65%
SPEED RANK: 616th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
101,694 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 88% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 68% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 68% Great: 88%
SPEED RANK: 281st / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
57.8 % 76.8 % Much faster effective speed.
+33%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
80.6 Pts 86.4 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+7%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
58.8 Pts 96.3 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+64%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
108 Pts 192 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+78%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
191 Pts 364 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+91%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
298 Pts 594 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+99%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
91.4 Pts 94 Pts +3%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
70.4 Pts 120 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+70%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
134 Pts 237 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+77%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
238 Pts 462 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+94%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
370 Pts 737 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+99%
Market Share
Based on 67,773,818 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.01 % 0.22 % Insanely higher market share.
+2,100%
Value
Value For Money
79.6 % 94.7 % Better value.
+19%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
54 % 66 % More popular.
+22%
Price
Price (score)
$87 Much cheaper.
+33%
$130
Age
Newest
115 Months +1% 116 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
95 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+32%
140 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores Much higher core count.
+33%
6 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
8 threads 12 threads Much higher thread count.
+50%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
32 nm 22 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+31%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.2 GHz 3.3 GHz +3%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+11%
3.6 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
378 Pts 933 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+147%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
305 Pts 748 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+145%
Series
CPU Architecture
Piledriver Haswell-E
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM3+ LGA2011-V3
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

The FX-8320E is a Vishera eight core processor based on AMD’s Piledriver architecture. The ‘E’ in the FX-8320E denotes energy efficiency with the FX-8320E boasting a TDP of 95 Watts which is relatively low for FX processors. The FX-8320E was launched in September 2014 at the same time as the FX-8370E. Comparing the 8370E and 8320E shows that the performance profiles are similar with the 25% more expensive 8370E edging ahead, particularly on single core workloads. The 8370E is clocked slightly higher with base/turbo frequencies of 3.3/4.3 GHz versus the 8320E’s 3.2/4.0 GHz. Overall the 8320E scores a mediocre effective speed of 70. Whilst this is sufficient for the majority of desktop applications: web-surfing, word-processing and playing movies, better single-core performance is offered by any number of Intel processors. [Dec '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Intel Core i7-5820K is the cheapest of three (5820K,5930K,5960X) new Haswell-E prosumer/enthusiast processors. The 5820K sports six physical cores and twelve threads which allow for enormous processing throughput. Unfortunately Intel have somewhat handicapped the 5820K by setting its base clock at just 3.3 GHz, 0.7GHz lower than the class leading 4790K. Comparing the 4790K and 5820K shows that the cheaper i7-4790K is significantly faster at both single and dual threaded workloads. The additional two cores found in the 5820K are not relevant to general computing and as such the 5820K probably makes a better server rather than consumer proposition. The Haswell-E X99 architecture also requires DDR4 RAM which is currently far more expensive than DDR3. Overall the 5820K is a very expensive option and probably best avoided by the vast majority of consumers.  [Sep '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback