COMPARE
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
AMDFD8320FRHKBOX
IntelBX8071513700K
▲ 564,753 ▼

8 Cores, 8 Threads @3.5GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q4 2012.

VS
▲ 918,254 ▼

16 Cores, 24 Threads @3.4GHz, Raptor Lake.
Release date: Q4 2022.

Effective Speed 
+114%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 147,510 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
106,454 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 65% Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 47% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 47% Great: 65%
SPEED RANK: 630th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
41,056 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 131% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.45 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 120% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Poor: 120% Great: 131%
SPEED RANK: 10th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 124%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		58.5 % 126 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+114%
Average Score 
+274%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		80.5 Pts 84.7 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+5%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		58.8 Pts 222 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+278%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		112 Pts 444 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+296%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		200 Pts 888 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+344%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		306 Pts 1,676 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+448%
Overclocked Score 
+230%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		90.9 Pts 93.4 Pts +3%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		68.9 Pts 230 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+234%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		132 Pts 459 Pts Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
+248%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		236 Pts 915 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+288%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		371 Pts 1,781 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+380%
Value & Sentiment 
+196%
Market Share
Based on 69,000,196 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.11 % 0.91 % Hugely higher market share.
+727%
Value
Value For Money 		78.6 % 125 % Much better value.
+59%
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		56 % 91 % Much more popular.
+62%
Price
Price (score) 		$95 Much cheaper.
+67% 		$284
Nice To Haves 
+234%
Age
Newest 		145 Months 24 Months Hugely more recent.
+83%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		125 Watts 125 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		8 cores 16 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		8 threads 24 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+200%
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		32 nm 10 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+69%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		3.5 GHz +3% 3.4 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		4 GHz 5.4 GHz Much faster turbo frequency.
+35%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		382 Pts 3,235 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+747%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		318 Pts 3,098 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+874%
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Piledriver Raptor Lake
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		AM3+ FCLGA1700
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		None UHD 770
Conclusion 
Average Bench 58.5%
Average Bench 126%

The AMD FX-8320 has the same architecture and specs as the FX-8350, the only difference being the base/turbo clocks of 3.5/4.0 GHz for the 8320 vs 4.0/4.2 GHz for the 8350. Comparing the two models shows that the 8320 lags the 8350 at stock speeds by around 10% but broadly matches it when both processors are overclocked. This combined with the 8320's considerably lower price tag makes the 8320 the better value proposition. In terms of outright performance, as with all AMD CPUs, the FX series have very strong multi-core performance but lag Intel considerably in terms of single and dual-core throughput. [Mar '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Intel’s 13th gen. Raptor Lake CPUs offer around 10% faster gaming and 45% faster multi-core performance than their predecessors. The new CPUs are compatible with DDR4 memory and Z690/B660 ($150) motherboards. New high-end gaming builders need look no further than the 13600K. The 13600K beats AMD’s flagship 7950X in gaming and almost matches the 7900X in multi-core performance. Extreme workstation users may find value in the 13700K or 13900K. Gamers on a tight budget can save $40 USD with a 13600KF which is a 13600K without integrated graphics. Although Ryzen 7000 has weaker multi-core, weaker single-core, higher platform costs and higher unit prices AMD have a 3D joker up their sleeve (7800X3D est. 2023). Via “Advanced Marketing” on youtube, forums, reddit, and twitter AMD will demonstrate that their upcoming CPU is the “best in the world” and offer “proof” by way of a small handful of obscure workloads. Games that few people play e.g. (Factorio, SotTR) will be cherry picked, video footage of the gameplay/settings won’t be provided and frame drops will be conveniently ignored. This playbook has easily outsold Intel in recent years but with every overhyped release, consumers lose trust in AMD. Based on social media/press coverage, you would never guess that the combined market share for all of AMD’s Radeon 5000 and 6000 GPUs amongst PC gamers is just 2.12% (Steam stats). Meanwhile Nvidia’s RTX 2060 alone accounts for a whopping 5.03%. Largely thanks to marketing incompetence, Intel is existentially motivated to deliver material annual performance improvements. Consumers can look forward to Meteor Lake (14th gen) in less than a years time. [Oct '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
106,454
41,056
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback