AMDFD6300WMHKBOX
AMDHDT55TFBGRBOX

6 Cores, 6 Threads @3.5GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q4 2012.

6 Cores, 6 Threads @2.8GHz, K10.
Release date: Q2 2010.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 285,442 user samples
261,607 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 62% Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 44% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 44% Great: 62%
SPEED RANK: 690th / 1456
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
23,835 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 61% Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 46% Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Poor: 46% Great: 61%
SPEED RANK: 707th / 1456
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
55.2 % +2% 54 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
79.2 Pts +2% 78 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
56.7 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+22%
46.6 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
104 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+14%
91.3 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
176 Pts Slightly faster quad-core speed.
+6%
166 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
217 Pts 231 Pts Slightly faster octa-core speed.
+6%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
89 Pts +0% 88.8 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
68.5 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+28%
53.5 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
124 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+17%
106 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
215 Pts Slightly faster OC quad-core speed.
+7%
201 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
265 Pts 284 Pts Slightly faster OC octa-core speed.
+7%
Market Share
Based on 68,106,438 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.07 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
0 %
Value
Value For Money
75.2 % Better value.
+23%
61.3 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
57 % Slightly more popular.
+6%
54 %
Price
Price (score)
$90 Much cheaper.
+49%
$175
Age
Newest
140 Months More recent.
+18%
170 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
95 Watts 95 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
6 cores 6 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
6 threads 6 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
32 nm Newer manufacturing.
+29%
45 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.5 GHz Faster base frequency.
+25%
2.8 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.1 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+24%
3.3 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
275 Pts 285 Pts +4%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
226 Pts 236 Pts +4%
Series
CPU Architecture
Piledriver K10
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM3+ AM3
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

The FX 6-Core, like most CPUs from AMD, delivers reasonably good server orientated multi threaded performance and consequently good processing thoughput at a reasonable price tag. Where the FX 6-Core lacks is in the area of single core performance which although not normally a major problem for server workloads, is always very relevant to desktop users. The overall performance of the FX 6-Core is comparable to Intel's five years younger Core i7-950. There are server orientated use cases where the FX 6-Core will excel thanks to its excellent overall throughput and in those instances the FX 6-Core represents good value for money. But typical desktop users will find far better value elsewhere[Sep '13 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD Phenom II X6 1055T was the second in a long line of X6's, each successive revision received a small clock speed boost. The 1055T was clocked at 2.8 GHz base and 3.3 GHz turbo. The 1100T was the fastest X6 and has a base/turbo clock of 3.3/3.7 GHz. Comparing the 1055T and 1100T shows that the two processors have a very similar performance profile, both excelling at multi-core workloads and both showing relative weakness in single, and dual-core workloads. In todays market the bar has been raised several notches especially for single and dual core workloads but the 1055T still puts in a relatively strong multi-core performance which is roughly on a par with an Ivy Bridge i5-3570K[Mar '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback