AMDAD750KWOHJBOX
AMDAD680KWOHLBOX

4 Cores, 4 Threads @3.4GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q4 2012.

4 Cores, 4 Threads @4.1GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q2 2013.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 17,177 user samples
5,882 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 59% Base clock 4.1 GHz
Worst Bench: 40% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Poor: 40% Great: 59%
SPEED RANK: 775th / 1452
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
11,295 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 61% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 39% Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Poor: 39% Great: 61%
SPEED RANK: 763rd / 1452
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
51.1 % 51.5 % +1%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
72.7 Pts +2% 71 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
60.9 Pts 66.6 Pts Slightly faster single-core speed.
+9%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
110 Pts 120 Pts Slightly faster dual-core speed.
+9%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
172 Pts 186 Pts Slightly faster quad-core speed.
+8%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
175 Pts 190 Pts Slightly faster octa-core speed.
+9%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
84.5 Pts 86.9 Pts +3%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
72.2 Pts 77.3 Pts Slightly faster OC single-core speed.
+7%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
133 Pts 146 Pts Slightly faster OC dual-core speed.
+10%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
217 Pts 222 Pts +2%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
216 Pts 222 Pts +3%
Market Share
Based on 67,979,761 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0 % 0.01 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
Value
Value For Money
84.2 % Hugely better value.
+89%
44.6 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
54 % 54 %
Price
Price (score)
$45 Hugely cheaper.
+90%
$467
Age
Newest
139 Months 132 Months Slightly more recent.
+5%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
100 Watts 100 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
4 cores 4 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
4 threads 4 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
32 nm 32 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.4 GHz 4.1 GHz Faster base frequency.
+21%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4 GHz 4.4 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+10%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
216 Pts 223 Pts +3%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
175 Pts 191 Pts Slightly faster 64-core speed.
+9%
Series
CPU Architecture
Piledriver Piledriver
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FM2 FM2
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None 8670D
ADVERTISEMENT

The Athlon II X4 750K is not about outright speed, it's about value for money. As a result of its relatively weak single core performance, which is around 26% slower than the 3225, the 750K scores in the bottom 34% for real world consumer performance. The Intel competitors offer far snappier response times but only if you are prepared to pay around 70% more. If you are on a super tight budget the 750K may well be the best option but for most consumer orientated tasks it's probably worth paying a little more. [Jun '13 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD A10-6800K is a Black Edition quad-core Richland APU based on second generation Bulldozer micro-architecture (codenamed Piledriver) launched in Q2 2013. It features Cayman-derived Integrated HD 8670 Graphics which are a marginal improvement on the Radeon HD 7660D graphics featured in the A10-6800K’s predecessor: the A10-5800K and which outperform the integrated graphics on comparable Intel Core i3 and i5 chips. The A10-6800K has a clock speed of 4.0 GHz, which automatically turbo boosts to 4.4 GHz when needed and can further be overclocked to 5.0 GHz on air cooling. The A10-6800K scores an effective speed of 73 which is okay, but compared to the similarly aged and priced i3-4130, it lacks in single-threaded performance. The A10-6800K is a good choice for those wanting reasonable CPU performance and integrated graphics on a budget. [Dec '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback