AMDYD1600BBAEBOX
AMDFD8350FRHKBOX

6 Cores, 12 Threads
@3.2GHz Zen (2017)

8 Cores, 8 Threads
@4.0GHz Piledriver (2012)

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 152,622 user samples
50,743 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 93% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 72% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Poor: 72% Great: 93%
SPEED RANK: 40th / 985
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
101,879 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 64% Base clock 4.65 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 47% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Poor: 47% Great: 64%
SPEED RANK: 210th / 985
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
82.1 % Much faster effective speed.
+45%
56.7 %
SC Mixed
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
103 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+36%
76 Pts
QC Mixed
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
396 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+42%
278 Pts
MC Mixed
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
867 Pts Hugely faster multi-core speed.
+81%
478 Pts
SC Mixed
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
115 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+37%
84.2 Pts
QC Mixed
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
455 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+44%
315 Pts
MC Mixed
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
986 Pts Much faster OC multi-core speed.
+79%
552 Pts
Market Share
Based on 7,397,866 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.79 % Much higher market share.
+59%
1.75 %
Value
Value For Money
100 % Better value.
+27%
79.2 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
128 % Much more popular.
+68%
76 %
Price
Price (score)
$170 $119 Cheaper.
+30%
Age
Newest
10 Months Hugely more recent.
+84%
64 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+48%
125 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
6 cores 8 cores Much higher core count.
+33%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
12 threads Much higher thread count.
+50%
8 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
14 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+56%
32 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.2 GHz 4 GHz Faster base frequency.
+25%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
3.6 GHz 4.2 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+17%
SC Int
Single Core Integer Speed
111 Pts Faster single-core int speed.
+22%
90.8 Pts
SC Float
Single Core Floating Point Speed
120 Pts Much faster single-core fp speed.
+53%
78.4 Pts
QC Int
Quad Core Integer Speed
439 Pts Faster quad-core int speed.
+29%
339 Pts
QC Float
Quad Core Floating Point Speed
473 Pts Much faster quad-core fp speed.
+64%
289 Pts
MC Int
Multi Core Integer Speed
956 Pts Much faster multi-core int speed.
+72%
557 Pts
MC Float
Multi Core Floating Point Speed
993 Pts Hugely faster multi-core fp speed.
+107%
480 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen (2017) Piledriver (2012)
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 AM3+
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

The Ryzen 5 1600 is one of four new Ryzen 5 processors released this month. Based on the AMD Zen architecture, which is comparable to Intel in terms of IPC, the Ryzen 5 1600 has six cores which is more than the vast majority of games are able to use (most games cannot use more than four cores). Ryzen 5 CPUs offer gamers better value for money than the eight core Ryzen 7 models released last month. With six cores the 1600 is approximately 75% better at multi-threaded tasks than Intel's quad core i5 flagship – the similarly priced i5-7600K, the 1600 however, has 25% lower single and 33% lower quad core scores. The 1600 has stock base/boost clock speeds of 3.2/3.6 GHz and its price tag of $219 includes a cooler. Assuming a modest overclock of 10% brings the 1600 within striking range of the 1600X which is the Ryzen 5 flagship. The 1600X sports stock base/boost clocks of 3.6/4.0 GHz but costs $30 more than the 1600 and ships without a cooler included in the box. The Ryzen 5 1600 is the best value for money six core CPU we have seen to date. [Apr '17 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

In terms of raw single-core performance the flagship AMD FX-8350 is lagging behind intel's processor line-up by over two generations. The PassMark Single Thread scores for the i5-2500K vs the FX-8350 are 1863 to 1520 which shows that in terms of raw per-core processing the FX-8350 is lagging the two year old i5 by 23%. Where the AMD FX makes up is on multi-core performance, with a score of 9156 vs 6745, the AMD leads the Intel 2500K by 36% making it the far more capable multi-threaded server orientated performer. The AMD is also cheaper but significantly more power hungry which counts strongly against it as a sever proposition. The FX-8350 could be a good fit for specific server use cases but for general consumer use, which is single and dual core intensive, Intel's two year old i5-2500K delivers better performance. [May '13 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) February 2018 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical consumers. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating which is geared towards gamers. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance and price.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark (UBM).
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write and mixed IO.
  • - Checks include: 4k Align, NCQ, TRIM, SATA, USB & S.M.A.R.T.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the highest voted in class.
  • - Find the best upgrades.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $430Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $87
Intel Core i7-7700K $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $285Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $146
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170AMD RX 480 $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $125
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $180SanDisk Extreme 64GB $50
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $200SanDisk Extreme 16GB $18
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  @Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback