AMDYD2600BBAFBOX
AMDFD8350FRHKBOX

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.4GHz, Zen+.
Release date: Q2 2018.

VS
About

8 Cores, 8 Threads @4.0GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q4 2012.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 391,319 user samples
189,046 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 83% Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 64% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Poor: 64% Great: 83%
SPEED RANK: 68th / 1182
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
202,273 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 55% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 39% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Poor: 39% Great: 55%
SPEED RANK: 288th / 1182
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
75.1 % Much faster effective speed.
+57%
48 %
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
111 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+50%
73.8 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed
219 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+53%
143 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
423 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+57%
270 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed
697 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+53%
457 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
913 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+96%
466 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
119 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+46%
81.5 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Mixed Speed
237 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+47%
161 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
471 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+52%
309 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Mixed Speed
786 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+48%
531 Pts
64-Core
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
1009 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+89%
533 Pts
Market Share
Based on 19,604,292 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
3.01 % Hugely higher market share.
+207%
0.98 %
Value
Value For Money
92 % Much better value.
+47%
62.7 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
112 % Much more popular.
+67%
67 %
Price
Price (score)
$133 $105 Cheaper.
+21%
Age
Newest
16 Months Hugely more recent.
+80%
82 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+48%
125 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
6 cores 8 cores Much higher core count.
+33%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
12 threads Much higher thread count.
+50%
8 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
12 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+62%
32 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.4 GHz 4 GHz Faster base frequency.
+18%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
3.9 GHz 4.2 GHz Slightly faster turbo frequency.
+8%
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen+ Piledriver
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 AM3+
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

The Ryzen 5 2600, from AMD’s second generation (Zen+) of high-end desktop Ryzen processors, supersedes the first generation Ryzen 5 1600. The newer generation sees a lithography reduction from 14nm to 12nm, but no increase in the number of cores and threads (6 and 12 respectively) over the ground-breaking first generation which continues to surpass similarly priced Intel CPUs in terms of multi-core performance. In other words, progress between generations is predominantly driven by power efficiency and therefore higher attainable clock speeds. The 2600 appears to have a stock base/boost clock of 3.4 / 3.9 GHz compared to the 1600’s 3.2 / 3.6 GHz which is expected to result in a modest increase in effective speed that said, early benchmarks are inconclusive. Included in the expected retail price of about $200 is a Wraith Stealth cooler, so the 2600, like the 1600 before it, represents great value for money, especially for workstation users. The 2600 compliments the new 400 series motherboards and is also backwards compatible with the 300 series following a bios update. [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

In terms of raw single-core performance the flagship AMD FX-8350 is lagging behind intel's processor line-up by over two generations. The PassMark Single Thread scores for the i5-2500K vs the FX-8350 are 1863 to 1520 which shows that in terms of raw per-core processing the FX-8350 is lagging the two year old i5 by 23%. Where the AMD FX makes up is on multi-core performance, with a score of 9156 vs 6745, the AMD leads the Intel 2500K by 36% making it the far more capable multi-threaded server orientated performer. The AMD is also cheaper but significantly more power hungry which counts strongly against it as a server proposition. The FX-8350 could be a good fit for specific server use cases but for general consumer use, which is single and dual core intensive, Intel's two year old i5-2500K delivers better performance. [May '13 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2019 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical gamers and desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating which is geared towards gamers. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $102
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $196AMD RX 580 $167Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $799SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback