Asus SABERTOOTH X58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X58  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '18 at 13:24
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon L5630
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 97.2
1-Core 90.7
2-Core 180
73% 123 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 427
49% 382 Pts
64-Core 429
26% 429 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Gigabyte(1458 36C3) 2GB
CLim: 1540 MHz, MLim: 1754 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Lighting 36.6
Reflection 36
Parallax 32.8
30% 35.1 fps
MRender 39.3
Gravity 33.2
Splatting 34.5
29% 35.7 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingdian S400 120GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q1115A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 113 119 111 32 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 343
Write 203
Mixed 244
SusWrite 88.6
49% 220 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 23.2
4K Mixed 12.5
52% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 83.4
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 26.6
49% 94.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
858GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 117 118 127 165 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 166
Mixed 91.5
SusWrite 135
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
237% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 6 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
44.5% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 11.5
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 13.7
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 49.6
81% 49.6 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH X58 Builds (Compare 1,678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $380
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback