Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte AB350-Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 10 '18 at 14:09
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 69.3
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 177
65% 114 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 401
50% 379 Pts
64-Core 414
26% 414 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Gigabyte(1458 36F9) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.31% Terrible
Lighting 3.83
Reflection 4.19
Parallax 3.53
3% 3.85 fps
MRender 3.67
Gravity 3.63
Splatting 5.61
4% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.31%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$70
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3K87RA Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 470
Write 245
Mixed 256
71% 324 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 33.5
4K Mixed 10.6
68% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 22.8
52% 112 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 88%
Wd1003fbyx-88 LEN 1TB
359GB free
Firmware: WB33 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 77.7
Write 63.4
Mixed 82.6
57% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.88
4K Mixed 0.43
102% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
39.4% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 12.9
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 12.5
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 2,812 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $456
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback